Complete-active-space

So-called complete active space (CAS) methods fomi all CSFs that... 

Roos B O, Taylor P R and Siegbahn P E M 1980 A complete active space SCF method (CASSCF) using a density matrix formulated super-CI approach Chem. Phys. 48 157-73... 

Roos B O 1987 The complete active space self-consistent field method and its applications in electronic structure calculations Adv. Chem. Phys. 69 399-445... 

The wave function for the elechonic structure can in principle be any of the constructions employed in electronic structure theoiy. The prefened choice in this context is a wave funchons that can be classified as single and multi-configurational, and for the latter type only complete active space (CAS) wave... 

Some details of END using a multiconfigurational electronic wave function with a complete active space (CASMC) have been introduced in terms of an orthonormal basis and for a fixed nuclear framework [25], and were recently [26] discussed in some detail for a nonoithogonal basis with electron translation factors. 

Complete active space self-consistent field... 

So-ealled complete-active-space (CAS) methods form all CSFs that ean be ereated by distributing N valenee eleetrons among P valenee orbitals. For example, the eight non-eore eleetrons of H2O might be distributed, in a manner that gives Ms = 0, among six... 

An MCSCF calculation in which all combinations of the active space orbitals are included is called a complete active space self-consistent held (CASSCF) calculation. This type of calculation is popular because it gives the maximum correlation in the valence region. The smallest MCSCF calculations are two-conhguration SCF (TCSCF) calculations. The generalized valence bond (GVB) method is a small MCSCF including a pair of orbitals for each molecular bond. 

In this exercise, we will introduce the Complete Active Space Multiconfiguration SCF (CASSCF) method, using it to compute the excitation energy for the first excited state of acrolein (a singlet). The CIS job we ran in Exercise 9.3 predicted an excitation energy of 4.437 eV, which is rather for from the experimental value of 3.72 eV. We ll try to improve this prediction here. 

---