Selectivity in Endothermic Reactions

Radical stability can often be explained in the same way as ion stability molecules that delocalize unpaired electrons tend to be more stable. Display spin density surfaces for 1-propyl and 2-propyl radicals. In which is the unpaired electron more delocalized Is this also the lower-energy radical  

Use of the Hammond Postulate requires that the reverse reactions both be fast. Obtain energies for the transition states leading to 1-propyl and 2-propyl radicals ipropane+Br end and propane+Br center), and draw a reaction energy diagram for each (place the diagrams on the same axes). Is use of the Hammond Postulate justified Compare the partial CH and HBr bond distances in each transition state to the corresponding distances in propane and hydrogen bromide, respectively. Does the Hammond Postulate correctly predict which bond distances will be most similar Explain. 

Spin density surface for 2-propyl radical shows location of unpaired electron. 

---

In fact, if the pressure P remains constant, and the increase in volume is d V, then the work which has been done is equal to PA V. Since we have selected an endothermic reaction, AH has a positive value. Its value would have been negative if an exothermic reaction had been chosen. 

In addition to the energy needed for endothermic reactions, there is substantial energy consumption in the various separation and purification steps in a chemical transformation process. Increasing selectivity in chemical reactions of the desired product, thereby decreasing the amount of by-product that has to be separated, would reduce the energy need accordingly. Additional opportunities arise when processing conditions can be modified, especially when radically new processes can be discovered. One example is methanol carbonylation. 

Radicals also exhibit high selectivity in addition reactions. For example, the per-oxyl radical of oxidizing styrene adds to the double bond of styrene with the rate constant k= 68 l/(mol s), and the oxygen molecule adds with k= 5.610 l/(mol s) (298 K). As in the case of abstraction reactions, the distinction is resulted by the feet that the first reaction is exothermic (A// = -100 kJ/mol), and the second reaction is endothermic (A// =125 kJ/mol). In this case, the differences are due to the fact that the chemical energy is stored in the free radical. To illustrate this, below we present the A// values for RH molecules and radicals R- formed ftem them. It is seen that this difference ranges from 180 to 280 kJ/mol, that is, very significant... 

This is an endothermic reaction in which a volume increase accompanies dehydrogenation. The reaction is therefore favoured by operation at reduced pressure. In practice steam is passed through with the ethylbenzene in order to reduce the partial pressure of the latter rather than carrying out a high-temperature reaction under partial vacuum. By the use of selected catalysts such as magnesium oxide and iron oxide a conversion of 35-40% per pass with ultimate yields of 90-92% may be obtained. 

As expected, heat exchanged per unit of volume in the Shimtec reactor is better than the one in batch reactors (15-200 times higher) and operation periods are much smaller than in a semibatch reactor. These characteristics allow the implementation of exo- or endothermic reactions at extreme operating temperatures or concentrations while reducing needs in purifying and separating processes and thus in raw materials. Indeed, since supply or removal of heat is enhanced, semibatch mode or dilutions become useless and therefore, there is an increase in selectivity and yield. 

In order to exemplify the potential of micro-channel reactors for thermal control, consider the oxidation of citraconic anhydride, which, for a specific catalyst material, has a pseudo-homogeneous reaction rate of 1.62 s at a temperature of 300 °C, corresponding to a reaction time-scale of 0.61 s. In a micro channel of 300 pm diameter filled with a mixture composed of N2/02/anhydride (79.9 20 0.1), the characteristic time-scale for heat exchange is 1.4 lO" s. In spite of an adiabatic temperature rise of 60 K related to such a reaction, the temperature increases by less than 0.5 K in the micro channel. Examples such as this show that micro reactors allow one to define temperature conditions very precisely due to fast removal and, in the case of endothermic reactions, addition of heat. On the one hand, this results in an increase in process safety, as discussed above. On the other hand, it allows a better definition of reaction conditions than with macroscopic equipment, thus allowing for a higher selectivity in chemical processes. 

Worz et al. stress a gain in reaction selectivity as one main chemical benefits of micro-reactor operation [110] (see also [5]). They define criteria that allow one to select particularly suitable reactions for this - fast, exothermic (endothermic), complex and especially multi-phase. They even state that by reaching regimes so far not accessible, maximum selectivity can be obtained [110], Although not explicitly said, maximum refers to the intrinsic possibilities provided by the elemental reactions of a process under conditions defined as ideal this means exhibiting isothermicity and high mass transport. 

Generally, under either isothermal or noniso-thermal conditions, intrapartiole diffusional limitations are undesirable because they reduce the selectivity below that which can be achieved in their absence. The exception to this generalization is a set of endothermic reactions that take place in nonisothermal pellets where the second reaction has an activation energy that is greater than that of the first. 

In practice, of course, it is rare that the catalytic reactor employed for a particular process operates isothermally. More often than not, heat is generated by exothermic reactions (or absorbed by endothermic reactions) within the reactor. Consequently, it is necessary to consider what effect non-isothermal conditions have on catalytic selectivity. The influence which the simultaneous transfer of heat and mass has on the selectivity of catalytic reactions can be assessed from a mathematical model in which diffusion and chemical reactions of each component within the porous catalyst are represented by differential equations and in which heat released or absorbed by reaction is described by a heat balance equation. The boundary conditions ascribed to the problem depend on whether interparticle heat and mass transfer are considered important. To illustrate how the model is constructed, the case of two concurrent first-order reactions is considered. As pointed out in the last section, if conditions were isothermal, selectivity would not be affected by any change in diffusivity within the catalyst pellet. However, non-isothermal conditions do affect selectivity even when both competing reactions are of the same kinetic order. The conservation equations for each component are described by... 

Thus our first conclusion if the harmful effects of thermal shock, or sintering of the catalyst surface, or drop in selectivity, do not occur with hot particles, then we would encourage nonisothermal behavior in exothermic reactions. On the other hand, we would like to depress such behavior for endothermic reactions. 

When the enthalpies of reaction between branched ketones and the corresponding 1,1-disubstituted alkenes are calculated using the multiple enthalpies of formation available for the latter, the following ranges are obtained Me/i-Pr, 196.6 to 200.5 Et/i-Pr, 201.2 to 206.6 and Me/t-Bu, 200.5 to 205.1 kJmol-1. Perhaps it is reasonable to conclude that the reaction enthalpies for the branched compounds either will be approximately constant, as for the unbranched ketone/alkene conversions, or will be more endothermic with branching, as in the branched aldehyde/alkene conversions. In either case, the least endothermic reaction enthalpy for the Me/i-Pr conversion above seems inconsistent and therefore the enthalpies of formation for 2,3-dimethyl-l-butene from References 16 or 26, which are essentially identical, should be selected. These enthalpies were also selected in a previous section. However, there is too much inconstancy, as well as too much uncertainty, in the replacement reactions of carbonyls and olefins to be more definitive in our conclusions. 

In the first reaction, 393.51 kJ are liberated (exothermic reaction) when 1 mol of gaseous C02 is formed from graphite and oxygen. When 2 mol HI are formed from gaseous hydrogen and solid iodine, there are 52.72 kJ absorbed (endothermic reaction). In the case of the second reaction, the standard heat of formation is +26.36 kJ/mol HI formed the total amount of energy involved in the reaction as written is twice the standard heat of formation because there were two moles of product formed. The reason why AH is the symbol instead of AHf is that the reaction does not address the formation of one mole of product therefore, AHf, which is calculated on a per-mole basis, is not an appropriate symbol for the reaction. Further, notice that the 0 is used in AHj and with other factors (S°, AGp or AE°) to indicate the standard condition of pressure, 1 atm (1 bar), usually 25°C and, for dissolved substances, of concentration 1 molal (refer to Chapter 12). For easy reference, selected standard heats of formation for selected substances are located in Table 7-1 however, notice that there are no elements listed in the table. 

In some cases, the heat dissipated in an exothermic reaction can be used in an endothermic reaction taking place at the opposite side of the membrane. Typical examples are hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reactions carried out by palladium or Pd-alloy membranes characterized by a 100% theoretical selectivity towards the hydrogen. 

The above considerations indicate that, independent of implementation details, the space-time yield of endothermic reactions could be significantly enhanced by shifting the reaction site to the heat-exchanging surfaces. This intention has led to the production of a large variety of multifunctional reactor concepts for coupling endothermic and exothermic reactions. In the following section the state of the art in this area will be discussed for selected examples. 

At high temperature, the EDC decomposes into VCM and HC1 by a complex reaction mechanism discussed further in this section. The endothermic reaction takes place at temperatures between 480-550 °C and pressures from 3 to 30 bar. The reaction device consists of a long tubular coil placed in a furnace (Figure 7.4). The first part, hosted in the convection zone, preheats the reactant up to the temperature where the pyrolysis reaction rate becomes significant The second part, the reaction zone, is placed in the radiation chamber. The tube diameter is selected so as to give a superficial gas velocity between 10-20 m/s. The coil length should ensure a space-time of 5 to 30 s. 

The exothermic and the endothermic reactions in the UMR process can be balanced by selecting the appropriate cycle times, fuel, steam and air flow rates. The repeatability in the gas composition data from cycle to cycle, as shown in Figure 8, is an indication of the stability of the UMR process. 

Since (16) is a rate-equilibrium relationship [equivalent to the relationship (2) discussed earlier], a is considered to reflect the degree of proton transfer in the transition state and hence is a measure of selectivity. Values of a close to 0 are associated with exothermic reactions in which the degree of proton transfer in the transition state is as yet small. Similarly, values of a close to 1 are associated with endothermic reactions in which the degree of proton transfer in the transition state is almost complete. 

The multitubular fixed-bed reactor (Fig. IB) constitutes the oldest and still predominant representative of this class. The catalyst packing is located in the individual tubes of the tube bundle. The heat-transfer medium is circulated around the tube bundle and through an external heat exchanger, in which the heat of reaction is supplied or removed ( Fig. 16). Whereas with endothermic reactions circulating gas can be used as heat transfer medium, for strongly exothermic reactions exclusively liquid or boiling heat transfer media are used. Only in this way can the catalyst temperature (c.g., in the case of partial oxidations) be held in the narrow temperature range necessary for selective reaction control. 

Description EB is dehydrogenated to styrene over potassium promoted iron-oxide catalyst in the presence of steam. The endothermic reaction is done under vacuum conditions and high temperature. At 1.0 weight ratio of steam to EB feed and a moderate EB conversion, reaction selectivity to styrene is over 97%. Byproducts, benzene and toluene, are recovered via distillation with the benzene fraction being recycled to the EB unit. 

In the second step, the dioxanes are vaporized, superheated, and then cracked on a solid catalyst (supported phosphoric acid) in the presence of steam. The endothermic reaction takes place a about 200 to 2S0°C and 0.1 to OJ. 10 Pa absolute. The heat required is supplied by the introduction of superheated steam, or by heating the support of the catalyst, which operates in a moving, fluidized or fixed bed, and, in this case, implies cyclic operation to remove the coke deposits formed. Isoprene selectivity is about SO to 90 mole per cent with once-through conversion of 50 to 60 per cent The 4-4 DMD produces the isoprene. The other dioxanes present are decomposed into isomers of isoprene (piperylene etc.), while the r-butyl alcohol, also present in small amounts, yields isobutene. A separation train, consisting of scrubbers, extractors and distillation columns, serves to recycle the unconverted DMD, isobutene and fonnol, and to produce isoprene to commercial specifications. 

---