Secondary-electron conduction

On the other hand, the reaction of l,12-bis(diphenylphosphino)dodecane with palladium dichloride generates a mixture of 34% macrocycle (79) and 61% polymer (80) that are in equilibrium with each other.92 This equilibrium represents a good evidence for ROP. The materials were characterized from 31P NMR in CD2C12 solution and size exclusion chromatography. Samples that were analyzed immediately after a slow evaporation followed by a redissolution contained polymers consisting of up to 80 units. Much higher Mn were observed in the secondary electron conduction (SEC) traces for polymers obtained by melt polymerization at 185°C for 15 min. Polymers consisting of up to 500 units were reported. 

Fig. 5.20. relationship between the starting velocity v of changes in electrical conductivity of ZnO films with different surface concentration of gold and the current of secondary electron emission J from Mg surface under the action of He [160]. The Au concentration grows in series 2 > 1... 

HRSEM images of STA-7 were taken using a JEOL JSM-7000F (FE SEM). Images of silicalite-2 and zeolite A were taken on a JEOL JSM-7401F (cold-FE SEM) using the Everhart-Thomley (E-T) secondary electron detector. Samples were not coated but placed on a conductive surface. 

In this type of Microscopy a fine beam of electrons is scanned across the surface of an opaque specimen to which a light conducting film has been applied by evaporation. Secondary electrons, backscattered elections, or (in the electron microprobe)... 

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) seems to have been used only scarcely for the characterization of solid lipid-based nanoparticles [104], This method, however, is routinely applied for the morphological investigation of solid hpid microparticles (e.g., to smdy their shape and surface structure also with respect to alterations in contact with release media) [24,38,39,41,42,80,105]. For investigation, the microparticles are usually dried, and their surface has to be coated with a conductive layer, commonly by sputtering with gold. Unlike TEM, in SEM the specimen is scanned point by point with the electron beam, and secondary electrons that are emitted by the sample surface on irradiation with the electron beam are detected. In this way, a three-dimensional impression of the structures in the sample, or of their surface, respectively, is obtained. 

In d-metals, the opposite is true the d-wavefunctions hybridize easily with conduction band states. The main peak can in this case be coordinated with the well screening outer d s, and the shake-up satellite, when observed, is due to the poorly screening process (Fig. 7c). For d-metals, furthermore, the very high density of d-states at Ep is the cause of many secondary electron excitation from just below Ep to empty states just beyond Ep which results in the asymetric high energy tailing of the main peak. Final state multiplet splitting, explained above, can in addition overlap the split response. 

The most recent calculations, however, of the photoemission final state multiplet intensity for the 5 f initial state show also an intensity distribution different from the measured one. This may be partially corrected by accounting for the spectrometer transmission and the varying energy resolution of 0.12, 0.17, 0.17 and 1,3 eV for 21.2, 40.8, 48.4, and 1253.6 eV excitation. However, the UPS spectra are additionally distorted by a much stronger contribution of secondary electrons and the 5 f emission is superimposed upon the (6d7s) conduction electron density of states, background intensity of which was not considered in the calculated spectrum In the calculations, furthermore, in order to account for the excitation of electron-hole pairs, and in order to simulate instrumental resolution, the multiplet lines were broadened by a convolution with Doniach-Sunjic line shapes (for the first effect) and Gaussian profiles (for the second effect). The same parameters as in the case of the calculations for lanthanide metals were used for the asymmetry and the halfwidths ... 

To decide whether a surface effect is present and, if so which, the experimental spectra shown in Fig. 16 have been corrected for the spectrometer transmission. The secondary electron contribution and the emission from conduction band states have also been subtracted. Comparing this spectrum with calculated multiplet intensities it seems that a contribution from a divalent Am surface resulting in a broad structureless 5f 5f line at 1.8 eV is the most suitable explanation of the measured intensity distribution. Theory also supports this interpretation, since the empty 5f level of bulk Am lies only 0.7 eV above Ep within the unoccupied part of the 6d conduction band (as calculated from the difference of the Coulomb energy Uh and the 5 f -> 5 f excitation energy Any perturbation inducing an increase of Ep by that amount will... 

Fig. 4. Potential energy versus distance from the surface. Data is appropriate for He and tungsten. E, is the ionization potential for helium and ( > is the work function of tungsten. E (e") is the kinetic energy of an emitted secondary electron. The symbol He + nej implies a system composed of an helium ion and n conduction electrons in tungsten. The lower potential curve results from an Auger neutralization process where both electrons were originally at the Fermi level. (The figure is similar to one published in Ref. )...

A Philips Environmental-SEM/EDX (Phihps XL30) was used to measure the morphology on untreated and plasma-treated powders. The powders were fixed on the sample holder by double conductive adhesive aluminum tape, and then gold-coated. Secondary electron images were recorded with the scanning electron microscope (SEM) using a 15 keV acceleration voltage. 

An electron torn away from a molecule, M, of a matrix (or an additive) by a y-quantum, by a secondary electron, or by a light quantum [reaction (1)1 is thermalized, i.e. slowed down to the rate of thermal motion [process (2)] and is then captured by a trap T [reaction (3)]. For the electron to be stabilized in the trap the energy level in this trap should be lower than the botton of the matrix conduction band (Fig. 1). The experimental investigations carried... 

Boundary conditions for electron density, ion density, and electron energy are all flux boundary conditions, wherein an expression is given for the flux of the quantity over which the balance is made. The net flux of electrons to the surface (assumed to be conducting) is the difference between the rate of recombination and the rate of creation through secondary electron... 

---