Screen analyses cumulative

The last two columns in Table 28,2 show the average particle diameter JDp in each increment and the cumulative fraction smaller than each value of 2) . In screen analyses cumulative fractions are sometimes written starting at the top of the stack and are expressed as the fraction larger than a given size. 

The data for a plot like Fig. 18-60 are easily obtained from a screen analysis of the total crystal content of a known volume (e.g., a liter) of magma. The analysis is made with a closely spaced set of testing sieves, as discussed in Sec. 19, Table 19-6, the cumulative number of particles smaller than each sieve in the nest being plotted against the aperture dimension of that sieve. The fraction retained on each sieve is weighed, and the mass is converted to the equivalent number of particles by dividing by the calculated mass of a particle whose dimension is the arithmetic mean of the mesh sizes of the sieve on which it is retained and the sieve immediately above it. 

Particles come in all shapes and sizes and in large numbers. Data are presented graphically using histograms, fractional plots, or cumulative plots. These graphs are primarily useful as pictures of the size distribution of the mixture. Table 15.4 gives a typical screen analysis for a 900-g sample. The measured experimental data are the mesh sizes, and the masses of the particles on each of the sieves are the masses of the residuals or fines. The other quantities are calculated. 

Given the following data for a screen analysis, calculate the mass fraction, cumulative mass fraction, and relative frequency. 

Where Wp is the weight of product obtained from WB grams of seeds, lB and W are the coordinates of the cumulative screen analysis curve for the seeds. If all the seed crystals are geometrically similar, then the true size, L, of a crystal is related to the sieve opening that will just pass the crystal, then L — cX and AL — a Al, and Eq. (28) may be written in terms of L and AL. 

Figure 27.15a relates the cumulative mass fraction to the dimensionless length z. For given values of G and t, z may be converted by Eq. (27.28) to the crystal size L, and Fig. 27.15a then becomes a plot of the cumulative screen analysis. This procedure is illustrated in Example 27.6. 

An MSMPR crystallizer produces 1 ton of product per hour having a predominant size of 35 mesh. The volume of crystals per unit volume of magma is 0.15. The temperature in the crystallizer is 120°F, and the retention time is 2.0 h. The densities of crystals and mother liquor are 105 and 82.5 ib/ft, respectively, (a) Plot the cumulative screen analysis of the theoretical product, b) Determine the required growth rate G and the necessary nucleation rate B". 

Example 30.1. A quartz mixture having the screen analysis shown in Table 30.1 is screened through a standard 10-mesh screen. The cumulative screen analysis of overflow and underflow are given in Table 30.1. Calculate the mass ratios of the overflow and underflow to feed and the overall effectiveness of the screen. 

Data analysis is interactive. The operator can control the slope sensitivity of a computer selected baseline, or can manually choose a baseline by means of a crosshair cursor on the raw data display. When the calculation is completed, the results are displayed on the screen. Plots of the raw data, and of the number, weight and surface differential and cumulative distribution can be displayed on the screen and printed at the operators option. 

In view of McWhirter and Pike s work, noise will limit the number of cumulants that we can actually measure. In most cases, only (E) and p.2 t)c determined. Cumulants are used for monomodal size distributions that have a PI not larger than 0.3. In bimodals or other more complex distributions, cumulant analysis will be meaningless and will only give some type of rough screening of the data. Even more, T>app( )> which is what is usually determined, is also dependent on the type of correlator, whether linear or nonlinear correlator, and the number of channels used [55]. 

This would mean that the particles on the 170 mesh screen lie between 88 p,m and 125 p,m. This representation of the data is referred to as a differential analysis. In a cumulative analysis, the particles retained on each screen are summed sequentially starting from either the receiver or the screen with the largest aperture. 

The result of the particle size analysis (screen or sieve analysis) can be represented in a numerical table and/or as a particle size cumulative distribution curve... 

These measures, although relatively widespread, have a number of deficiencies, one of which is that they do not sufficiently accoimt for early emichments in sets of retrieved compounds. This issue can be dealt with using cumulative recall cmves, which plot the fraction of actives against the number of compoimds retrieved [108, 109]. These curves are similar to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) cmves. Truchon and Bayly [110] have provided a detailed analysis of their application to virtual screening methods. 

In a third example case, p-carbolines are inhibitors of monoamine oxidases (MAO-A and MAO-B) and can be found in foods, hallucinogenic plants or certain plant dmgs. The referred article described a fast analysis method for p-carbolines based on the inhibition of MAO [79]. The MAO-A is inhibited by all three tested P-carbolines (harmane, norharmane and harmaline), while MAO-B is inhibited only by norharmane. The presence of norharmane in mixtures of p-carbolines can be identified based on the difference between the cumulative inhibition of MAO-A by all p-carbolines and MAO-B inhibition. The enzymes were immobilized on screen-printed electrodes modified with a stabilized film of Pmssian blue that contain also copper. Benzylamine was used as substrate for the enzymatic reaction and the hydrogen peroxide formed was measured amperometrically at —50 mV. The developed biosensors were used for food analysis. The detection limits obtained were 5.0 pM for harmane and 2.5 pM for both harmaline and norharmane. 

---