Factor scaling coefficient

A traditional notation in chemometrics for SVD defines scores and loadings by means of the symbols T and P such that X = T P, which is equivalent to X = U A V, where T = U A and P = V. This notation corresponds with the case a = 1 and P = 0, which is the most frequently used combination of factor scaling coefficients in chemometrics. 

Fig. 31.1. (a) Score plot in which the distances between representations of rows (wind directions) are reproduced. The factor scaling coefficient a equals 1. Data are listed in Table 31.1. (b) Loading plot in which the distances between representations of columns (trace elements) are preserved. The factor scaling coefficient P equals 1. Data are defined in Table 31.1. 

This corresponds with a choice of factor scaling coefficients a = 1 and p = 0, as defined in Section 31.1.4. Note that classical PCA implicitly assumes a Euclidean metric as defined above. Let us consider the yth coordinate axis of column-space, which is defined by a p-vector of unit length of the form ... 

Fig. 32.8. CFA biplot computed from the data in Table 32.10. Circles represent years and squares identify the four educational categories. The centre of the plot is represented by a small cross. The coordinates of the years and the categories are contained in Tables 32.11 and 32.12. Factor scaling coefficients were defined as a = P = 1.

Triple-zeta + 2 />-functions + 1 (i-function. exp = exponential scale factor, c = coefficient. 

Q is the acoustic quality factor of the film. It depends on all interfacial transmission and reflection coefficients, and therefore contains all the complexity indicated above. On the level of this review, we regard Q as a scaling coefficient, but note that it can be calculated in detail [36],... 

With respect to the evolution of the phenomenon considered in Table 6.7, if 3g, a , and a are the scaling factors (the coefficients that multiply the laboratory model parameters in order to obtain the value of the prototype s parameters) then these can be written as ... 

Matrix S is called the score matrix. Its rows comprise the scaling coefficients. Matrix F may be called the loading matrix or principal components (PCs) or factors or eigenvectors. Its columns comprise the calculated principal components. By... 

Here the coefficients are functions of the kinematic variables and the factorization scale. Different hard processes will contribute with different leading powers k to the partonic cross section. 

Fig. 4. PCA breaks apart the spectral data into the most common spectral variations (factors, eigenvectors, and loadings) and the corresponding scaling coefficients (scores).

Because of the scaling by the internal flow magnitude M, the factors E and N are independent of both the throughput L and the internal flow magnitude M. In terms of these factors, the coefficients g and y of Eqs. (54) and (55) may be written in the form... 

As noted earlier in section A2.5.6.2. the assumption of homogeneity and tlie resnlting principle of two-scale-factor universality requires the amplitude coefficients to be related. In particnlar the following relations can be derived ... 

The remainder of the input file gives the basis set. The line, 1 0, specifies the atom center 1 (the only atom in this case) and is terminated by 0. The next line contains a shell type, S for the Is orbital, tells the system that there is 1 primitive Gaussian, and gives the scale factor as 1.0 (unsealed). The next line gives Y = 0.282942 for the Gaussian function and a contiaction coefficient. This is the value of Y, the Gaussian exponential parameter that we found in Computer Project 6-1, Part B. [The precise value for y comes from the closed solution for this problem S/Oir (McWeeny, 1979).] There is only one function, so the contiaction coefficient is 1.0. The line of asterisks tells the system that the input is complete. 

The functional form for van der Waals interactions in AMBER is identical with that shown in equation (13) on page 175. The coefficients A. and B.. are computed from the parameters in the file pointed to by the 6-12AtomVDW entry for the parameter set in the Registry or the chem. ini file, usually called nbd.txt(dbf), and optionally with the file pointed to by the 6-12PairVDW entry for the parameter set, usually called npr.txt(dbf). The standard AMBER parameter sets use equations (15) and (16) for the combination rules by setting the 6-12AtomVDWFormat entry to RStarEpsilon. The 1 van der Waals interactions are usually scaled in AMBER to half their nominal value (a scale factor of 0.5 in the Force Field Options dialog box). 

Implementation Issues A critical factor in the successful application of any model-based technique is the availability of a suitaole dynamic model. In typical MPC applications, an empirical model is identified from data acquired during extensive plant tests. The experiments generally consist of a series of bump tests in the manipulated variables. Typically, the manipulated variables are adjusted one at a time and the plant tests require a period of one to three weeks. The step or impulse response coefficients are then calculated using linear-regression techniques such as least-sqiiares methods. However, details concerning the procedures utihzed in the plant tests and subsequent model identification are considered to be proprietary information. The scaling and conditioning of plant data for use in model identification and control calculations can be key factors in the success of the apphcation. 

The heat transfer area, A ft, in an exchanger is usually estahlished as the outside surface of all the plain or hare tubes or the total finned surface on the outside of all the finned tubes in the tube bundle. As will be illustrated later, factors that inherendy are a part of the inside of the tube (such as the inside scale, transfer film coefficient, etc.) are often corrected for convenience to equivalent outside conditions to be consistent. When not stated, transfer area in conventional shell and tube heat exchangers is considered as outside tube area. 

The prediction step for PLS is also slightly different than for PCR. It is also done on a rank-by-rank basis using pairs of special and concentration factors. For each component, the projection of the unknown spectrum onto the first spectral factor is scaled by a response coefficient to become a corresponding projection on the first concentration factor. This yields the contribution to the total concentration for that component that is captured by the first pair of spectral and concentration factors. We then repeat the process for the second pair of factors, adding its concentration contribution to the contribution from the first pair of factors. We continue summing the contributions from each successive factor pair until all of the factors in the basis space have been used. 

---