Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

SANS Results

As an example Fig. 12 presents the inverse susceptibility of a dPB(l,4)/PS blend (Sample 2 in Table 2) versus the inverse temperature measured in four pressure fields between 0.1 and 150 MPa. The solid lines represent a fit with the crossover fimction in Eq. 19 and show good agreement. The parameters derived from S(0), namely, the pressure dependent phase boimdaries, the Ginzburg munber, and the FH parameter will be discussed in the following figures. [Pg.33]

The spinodal (critical) and binodal temperatures of the three samples are depicted in Fig. 13 versus pressure. In all samples an increase of the phase boundaries with pressure is observed. Such a behavior is expected because of the reduced free volume. The shape of the phase boundary is linear for the blends with the dPB(l,4) and dPB(l,4 l,2) copolymers and is more parabolic for the blend with dPB(l,2). The dPB(l,2) sample was at the critical composition while the other two samples are slightly off critical composition as seen from the deviation between the spinodals and binodals. The worst compatibility is observed for the dPB(l,2)/PS sample, the best one for the dPB, 4)/PS, and for the copolymer sample it lies in between. [Pg.33]

The Ginzburg number of the PPMS/PS and PB/PS blends in Fig. 14 always decreases with pressure but shows characteristic differences [36,37]. The PPMS/PS blend is characterized by a relatively large Gi at ambient pressures and a rather fast decrease at larger pressures. On the other hand, Gi for the PB/PS blends rather strongly depends on the vinyl content of the polybutadiene chains, which, of course, is due to the corresponding entropic Fo contributions (see Eq. 20). The largest Gi appear for the blend with dPB(l,2), which is constant up to 100 MP, followed by a rather strong decrease. In the dPB(l,4) blend, pressure induces a linear decrease of Gi. The lowest Gi [Pg.34]

It is found from the analysis that the effect of pressure on thermal fluctuations is mainly determined by the variation of the mean field parameters at least for PB/PS the Ising critical amphtude C+ (defined above in Eq. 17) is independent of pressure within an accmacy of 3% (Fig. 9 in ref. [37]). [Pg.35]

The FH parameters 7h and Fa derived from the mean field critical ampU-tude Cmf in Eq. 11 are depicted in Eig. 15. In all cases /I, and Fo decrease with pressure. The enthalpic term is largest for the PB(1,2)/PS blend. This can be understood from the solubility parameters of the monomers the PS chains have a larger solubihty parameter than both PB monomers as can be seen from Table 5 in ref. [77]), while the solubility parameter of PB(1,2) is smaller than PB(1,4) as discussed in context with Pig. 11. Therefore, mixing PB(1,2) and PS leads to a larger difference in solubihty parameters and thereby to a larger enthalpic term. The F of the copolymer PB(1,2 1,4) is lowest But the low entropic term counters a stronger enhanced compatibihty from Fh. [Pg.35]


The three-stage mechanism of the cooperative self-assembly during the SBA-15 synthesis is illustrated in Figure 4. Our SANS results confirm, in agreement with a recent TEM study [4], that the transformation from spherical to cylindrical micelles takes place before the precipitation of the ordered SBA-15 material, and that the precipitation is associated with the self-assembly of hybrid cylindrical micelles into the two-dimensional hexagonal structure of SBA-15. [Pg.55]

When Fernandez et al. studied partially polymerized Series P PB/PS systems, SANS results yielded peaks in the scattering patterns, see Figure 14 [ ]. Early attempts at understanding these peaks were troublesome due to the multiple causes for such peaks. Later, similar peaks were observed in another set of samples, which were partially swollen, then fully reacted (series S) by An et al. [41], but, in this case, shoulders instead of distinct maximum were observed (Figure 15). In both cases, such maximum or shoulders appeared at mid-range compositions, then were replaced by smoothly decreasing curves on further polymerization of monomer II. [Pg.284]

Other molecular thermodynamic models for protein-reverse micelle complexes have also emerged. Bratko et al. [171] presented a model for phase transfer of proteins in RMs. The shell and core model was combined with the Poisson-Boltzmann approximation for the protein-RM complex and for the protein-free RM. The increase in entropy of counterions released from RMs on solubilization of a protein was the main contribution to the decrease in free energy of com-plexation. Good agreement was found with SANS results of Sheu et al. [151] for cytochrome C solubilization and the effect of electrolytes on it. However, this model assumes that filled and empty RMs are of the same size, independent of salt strength and pH, which is not true according to experimental evidence available since then. [Pg.143]

The sizes were determined by small angle neutron scattering method (SANS), (Markovic et al., 1984). In order to interpret the SANS results, a concentric sphere model was used. A spherical homogeneous core particle of radius R and the total spherical units were taken as R2, giving the thickness of the adsorbed layer as (R2 - R,)... [Pg.93]

Further analysis of these preliminary SANS results is complex and can only be outlined here. The treatment takes as its basis, a model composed of an array of parallel cylindrical objects, length, 1 and cross-sectional radius, a [14]. [Pg.464]

Figure 11. Anisotropic SANS results for an oriented alumina membrane (Anodise, A20). In (a) the orientation is perpendicular and in (b) parallel to the incident neutron beam respectively. I(Qh) and I(Qv) correspond to scattering along the horizontal and vertical axes of the 2D detector, respectively. Figure 11. Anisotropic SANS results for an oriented alumina membrane (Anodise, A20). In (a) the orientation is perpendicular and in (b) parallel to the incident neutron beam respectively. I(Qh) and I(Qv) correspond to scattering along the horizontal and vertical axes of the 2D detector, respectively.
On the basis of the SANS results, a molecular mechanism has been recently proposed for the toughness enhancement of DN gels [34]. This mechanism rationalizes the changes in molecular structure of the DN gel constituents observed via in-situ neutron scattering measurements, the composition dependence of the solution viscosity, and the thermodynamic interaction parameters of PAMPS and PAAm molecules obtained previously from neutron scattering studies. More specifically, this proposed mechanism provides an explanation for the observed periodic compositional fluctuations in the micrometer range induced by large strain deformation. [Pg.216]

Table 11-2-2 summarizes the effects of nicotinic receptor activation on the adrenal medulla, the autonomic ganglia, and the neuromuscular junction. The effect of autonomic ganglia stimulation depends upon the transmission system used to conned the ganglia to the end organ. Blood vessels are innervated by SANS, resulting in vasoconstriction. PANS innervates the gut, the end result being increased motility and secretion. [Pg.51]

These SANS results therefore confirm the existence of a separated phase containing most of the ionic exchange sites and the hydration water. [Pg.165]

The same authors also investigated the influence of the copolymer composition of SAN in PCL/SAN blends on G° and (c7(7 ) The plot of aay versus the acrylonitrile content in SAN shows a minimum (Figure 3.10), suggesting that the addition of SAN results in a stabilization of the growing PCL crystallites. This effect was more pronounced when the interactions between SAN and PCL, indicated by f, are more favorable. Since G° is proportional to x - Xs [Saito et al., 1991], with Xs the interaction parameter at the spinodal, a minimum was also noticed in the G° versus the copolymer composition of SAN (see Figure 3.11). [Pg.220]

It is found that the steady state C 7 is about 2.08x10" ar and 1.81x10" ar for the ion-irradiated Fe-9at%Cr alloy and Fe-12.5at%Cr alloy, respectively. In Heintze et al. (2011) correlation between Vickers-hardness/yield stress of neutron-irradiated materials and indentation hardness of both ion-irradiated Fe-9at%Cr and Fe-12.5at%Cr alloys was found, and the assumption that the SANS results can be transferred to the ion-irradiated materials, if the dpa-values agree, was manifested. According to this statement CD modeling of kinetics of a -phase in ion-irradiated Fe-9at% and Fe-12.5at%Cr alloys has been carried out. The value of that provides the best fit of CD results to SANS data is found to be about 3.4 x 10" J/m vs. 0.17 J/m in Gokhman et al. (2011), where TEM data for the neutron-irradiated Fe-12.5at%Cr alloy are taken. [Pg.39]

S, 29] in the nematic phase has been clearly demonstrated [30, 31]. Similar SANS results have recently been reported for a polyether based on a diphenylethane derivative [32]. [Pg.154]

During the years 1992-1998, numerous publications emerged from Prof. Graessley s laboratory. The model PEs with different stmctures (see Fig. 18.10) were commercial (e.g., HDPE or PP) or from laboratory (e.g., hydrogenation/deuteration of diolefins, anionic reaction for PIB, Z-N catalysis using a V-based catalyst in Cg for poly (ethylene-co-a-olefin) or later a metallocene catalyst. The thermodynamic properties of numerous PO blends were extracted from the pressuie-volume-temperature (PVT) data (Walsh et al. 1992 Krishnamoorti et al. 1996) or from SANS results (Krishnamoorti et al. 1994, 1995 Graessley et al. 1994, 1995 Reichart et al. 1997 Alamo et al. 1997). [Pg.1587]

Fig. 18.12 The H-F binary interaction parameter, y, for head-to-head blend with PIB as functions of temperatiu es (solid circles are for 1/T(K), optat f(OT T °C) (Data Krishnamoorti et al. 1996). The parametras calculated fiorn SANS results... Fig. 18.12 The H-F binary interaction parameter, y, for head-to-head blend with PIB as functions of temperatiu es (solid circles are for 1/T(K), optat f(OT T °C) (Data Krishnamoorti et al. 1996). The parametras calculated fiorn SANS results...

See other pages where SANS Results is mentioned: [Pg.60]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.1188]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.1243]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.354]   


SEARCH



SANS

SANS Results on Blends

© 2024 chempedia.info