Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sampling water treatment plant

Gravity die cast ZA alloy test plates and 99.99% pure rolled zinc samples were exposed at a waste water treatment plant in Detroit, Michigan, USA. The results after one year are summarised in Table 4.38 . [Pg.824]

Fig. 3. Dissolved REE data for waste water treatment plants in different countries Notice the orders of magnitude difference in Gd values. Data for Denver from Bau et al. (2006), Berlin from Bau Dulski (1996), Mackay from Lawrence et al. (2006) and Prague from Moller et al. (2002). Samples from Vienna and Bremen are from this study. Fig. 3. Dissolved REE data for waste water treatment plants in different countries Notice the orders of magnitude difference in Gd values. Data for Denver from Bau et al. (2006), Berlin from Bau Dulski (1996), Mackay from Lawrence et al. (2006) and Prague from Moller et al. (2002). Samples from Vienna and Bremen are from this study.
Naf, C., Broman, D., Ishag, R., Zebuhr, Y., PCDDs and PCDFs in water, sludge and air samples from various levies in a waste water treatment plant with respect to composition changes and total flux, Chemosphere 20,1990,1503-1510. [Pg.213]

The time has long since passed when one could rely on gas chromatographic or liquid chromatographic data alone to identify unknown compounds in environmental samples. The sheer number of compounds present in such materials would invalidate the use of these techniques, and even in the case of simple mixtures the time required for identification would be too great to provide essential information in the case, for example, of accidental spillage of an organic substance into a water course or inlet to a water treatment plant where information is required very rapidly. [Pg.71]

Allison Trentman and B.J. Kronschnabel of the City of Lincoln, Nebraska, Water Treatment Plant Laboratory take samples of drinking water from a distribution system sampling site. [Pg.20]

Ion chromatography is used at the City of Lincoln, Nebraska, Water Treatment Plant Laboratory to analyze water samples taken from sampling sites in the distribution system around the city. The common anions determined by IC are not only nitrate, nitrite, fluoride, and sulfate, but also bromate. Bromate is found in the water because the Lincoln plant treats the water with ozone. Adding ozone to the water oxidizes any bromide to bromate. Bromate is regulated at 10 parts per billion (ppb) its concentration must be determined. [Pg.375]

HANGARTNER, M., Sampling and Analysis of Odorous Compounds in Water Treatment Plants. Institute of Hygiene and Ergonomics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland. [Pg.331]

Biological Monuron was mineralized in sewage samples obtained from a water treatment plant in Ithaca, NY. 4-Chlorophenylurea and 4-chloroaniline were tentatively identified as metabolites (Wang et al, 1985). [Pg.1598]

Heberer T, Dunnbier U, Reilich C, Stan HJ (1997) Detection of drugs and drug metabolites in ground water samples of a drinking water treatment plant. Fresenius Environ Bull 6 438-443... [Pg.68]

Planas C, Palacios O, Ventura F, Rivera J, Caixach J (2008) Analysis of nitrosamines in water by automated SPE and isotope dilution GC/HRMS - Occurrence in the different steps of a drinking water treatment plant, and in chlorinated samples from a reservoir and a sewage treatment plant effluent. Talanta 76 906-913... [Pg.136]

Reflectance measurements provided an excellent means for building an ammonium ion sensor involving immobilization of a colorimetric acid-base indicator in the flow-cell depicted schematically in Fig. 3.38.C. The cell was furnished with a microporous PTFE membrane supported on the inner surface of the light window. The detection limit achieved was found to depend on the constant of the immobilized acid-base indicator used it was lO M for /7-Xylenol Blue (pAT, = 2.0). The response time was related to the ammonium ion concentration and ranged from 1 to 60 min. The sensor remained stable for over 6 months and was used to determine the analyte in real samples consisting of purified waste water, which was taken from a tank where the water was collected for release into the mimicipal waste water treatment plant. Since no significant interference fi-om acid compounds such as carbon dioxide or acetic acid was encountered, the sensor proved to be applicable to real samples after pH adjustment. The ammonium concentrations provided by the sensor were consistent with those obtained by ion chromatography, a spectrophotometric assay and an ammonia-selective electrode [269]. [Pg.184]

Chlorate and chlorite ions are disinfection by-products (DBPs) from water treatment using chlorine dioxide. Table 6-2 contains data from four water treatment facilities in the United States that use chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant. Source water samples were also analyzed from each facility and no chlorite or chlorate ions were detected. In all water treatment plants, water taken from the distribution system (i.e., water sampled at water treatment plant) had measurable concentrations of both chlorite and chlorate ions. The ranges of concentrations were 15-740 and 21-330 pg/L for chlorite and chlorate, respectively (Bolyard et al. 1993). [Pg.100]

Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate was found at microgram-per-litre levels in two of five samples of finished water from a water-treatment plant in the United States (WHO, 1996). It was detected in finished drinking-water in New Orleans, Louisiana, at an average concentration of 0.10 pg/L but not in drinking-water in two smaller nearby cities (lARC, 1982). Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate was detected in the Delaware River at levels of 0.08-0.3 pg/L (Sheldon Hites, 1979). It has also been identified in Europe... [Pg.152]

There is a scarcity of Canadian data on ground water quality. In 1979, a survey was undertaken by the Department of National Health and Welfare. Water samples were taken at 30 water treatment plants in 29 municipalities serving 5.5 million consumers, including all major population centers (11). Only three of these were ground water sources where minimal or no treatment was practiced. The total organic carbon content of these ground waters was less than half of that found in water supplies taken from rivers and lakes, and the trihalomethane content was also significantly low. [Pg.717]

The sampling location is selected in accordance with the measurement objectives. If it is the efficiency of a water treatment plant that is to be determined, the sampling sites should be located above and below the points of water entry to the plant. For studying the effect of effluent discharge on water quality in a river, water samples should be collected upstream and downstream of the outfall. [Pg.9]

In a pilot project on the monitoring and assessment of the quality of the waters of the Bug River where it forms the eastern border of Poland, tests were carried out to assess the acute and chronic toxicity of water samples taken from the river, sediment samples, and treated effluents reaching surface waters from the water treatment plants located in the river basin.116 Using a much simplified... [Pg.211]


See other pages where Sampling water treatment plant is mentioned: [Pg.843]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.1633]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.75]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.329 ]




SEARCH



Plant sampling

Sample treatment

Treatment plants

Water plants

Water treatment

© 2024 chempedia.info