Ruthenium bromide

Hydroxo-nitroso-tetrammino-ruthenium Salts. Hydroxo-nitroso-tetrammino-ruthenium Bromide,1... 

Hydroxo-nitroso-tetrammino-ruthenium bromide is dissolved in hot water, an equal volume of concentrated hydrochloric acid added, and the mixture evaporated on a water-bath. After some time a pale flesh-coloured, sparingly soluble powder separates. 

Related ruthenium bromide or -iodide complexes are also obtained by using CH2Br2 or CH3I instead of CCI4 in 75 and 60 % yield, respectively. 

Binary Compounds. The mthenium fluorides are RuF [51621 -05-7] RuF [71500-16-8] tetrameric (RuF ) [14521 -18-7] (15), and RuF [13693-087-8]. The chlorides of mthenium are RUCI2 [13465-51-5] an insoluble RuCl [10049-08-8] which exists in an a- and p-form, mthenium trichloride ttihydrate [13815-94-6], RuCl3-3H2 0, and RuCl [13465-52-6]. Commercial RuCl3-3H2 0 has a variable composition, consisting of a mixture of chloro, 0x0, hydroxo, and often nitrosyl complexes. The overall mthenium oxidation state is closer to +4 than +3. It is a water-soluble source of mthenium, and is used widely as a starting material. Ruthenium forms bromides, RuBr2 [59201-36-4] and RuBr [14014-88-1], and an iodide, Rul [13896-65-6]. 

Other Metals. Ruthenium, the least expensive of the platinum group, is the second best electrical conductor, has the hardest deposit, and has a high melting point. A general purpose bath uses 5.3 g/L of mthenium as the sulfamate salt with 8 g/L sulfamic acid, and is operated at 25—60°C with a pH of 1—2. Osmium has been plated from acid chloride solutions (130) and iridium from bromide solutions, but there are no known appHcations for these baths. 

Unlike ruthenium (and other platinum metals) osmium forms chlorides and bromides in a range of oxidation states [11,12]. 

The ruthenium analogue of 47 Ru(ri5-C5Ph5)(CO)2Br (48) is also available, when Fe(CO)5 is replaced by Ru3(CO)12 [68]. A wide range of substitution products were obtained through replacement of both carbonyl and bromide ligand against two-electron ligands L such as phosphines, phosphites, and ethylene. Electrochemistry of these derivatives were studied in some detail. 

The metal-catalysed autoxidation of alkenes to produce ketones (Wacker reaction) is promoted by the presence of quaternary ammonium salts [14]. For example, using copper(II) chloride and palladium(II) chloride in benzene in the presence of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, 1-decene is converted into 2-decanone (73%), 1,7-octadiene into 2,7-octadione (77%) and vinylcyclohexane into cyclo-hexylethanone (22%). Benzyltriethylammonium chloride and tetra-n-butylammo-nium hydrogen sulphate are ineffective catalysts. It has been suggested that the process is not micellar, although the catalysts have the characteristics of those which produce micelles. The Wacker reaction is also catalysed by rhodium and ruthenium salts in the presence of a quaternary ammonium salt. Generally, however, the yields are lower than those obtained using the palladium catalyst and, frequently, several oxidation products are obtained from each reaction [15]. 

A method for the study of ET from a protein metal center to a surface ruthenium has been developed by Lieber [26]. In this method, Ru(bpy) " acts as an oxidant, selectively removing an electron from a surface a5Ru(IIXhistidine). A Ni/RBr scavenger system (Ni(II)hexamethyltetraaza-cyclododeeane and an alkyl bromide) oxidizes the Ru(bpy)3 before it can back react with the a5Ru(IIIXhistidine) complex. ET from the reduced protein metal center to the oxidized ruthenium can be monitored spectroscopically. 

Data in Table I illustrate the production of acetic acid from 1/1 syngas catalyzed by ruthenium-cobalt halide bimetallic combinations dispersed in tetrabutylphosphonium bromide (m.p. 100°C). 

The ruthenium(111) acetylacetonate-cobalt(II) iodide couple, for example, when dispersed in tetrabutylphosphonium bromide (ex. 1) and treated with 1/1 CO/H2 at 220°C, generates a liquid product containing 76 wt % acetic acid plus 1.1 wt % propionic acid (111 mmol total acid). The liquid yield increase is 66% and the estimated carbon selectivity to acetic plus propionic acids and their esters is 84%. There is normally no metallic residue at this stage, ruthenium and cobalt recovery is essentially quantitative at the end of the run, and the product acids may be recovered in >90% purity by fractional distillation. Methane and water are the major by-products (4). 

It is clear that ruthenium-cobalt-iodide catalyst dispersed in low-melting tetrabutylphosphonium bromide provides a unique means of selectively converting synthesis gas in one step to acetic acid. Modest changes in catalyst formulation can, however, have profound effects upon liquid product composition. 

Other sources of radical CF3, much less expensive than CF3I, have been discovered. These are the anodic oxidation of sodium trifluoroacetate (the decomposition being initated by a hydroperoxide or ruthenium catalyst) and trifluoromethyl bromide (CF3Br) using sodium dithionite as initiating agent. ... 

Our initial work on the TEMPO / Mg(N03)2 / NBS system was inspired by the work reported by Yamaguchi and Mizuno (20) on the aerobic oxidation of the alcohols over aluminum supported ruthenium catalyst and by our own work on a highly efficient TEMP0-[Fe(N03)2/ bipyridine] / KBr system, reported earlier (22). On the basis of these two systems, we reasoned that a supported ruthenium catalyst combined with either TEMPO alone or promoted by some less elaborate nitrate and bromide source would produce a more powerful and partially recyclable catalyst composition. The initial screening was done using hexan-l-ol as a model substrate with MeO-TEMPO as a catalyst (T.lmol %) and 5%Ru/C as a co-catalyst (0.3 mol% Ru) in acetic acid solvent. As shown in Table 1, the binary composition under the standard test conditions did not show any activity (entry 1). When either N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) or Mg(N03)2 (MNT) was added, a moderate increase in the rate of oxidation was seen especially with the addition of MNT (entries 2 and 3). 

Ruthenocene has been prepared in 20% yields by reaction of cyclopentadienylmagnesium bromide with ruthenium(III) acetyl-acetonate.8 More recently,4 the compound has been made in 43-52% yield by treatment of sodium cyclopentadienide with ruthenium trichloride in tetrahydrofuran or 1,2-dimethoxyethane. 

---