Ruthenium , acetate complexes

Recent literature describes the synthesis of vinyl esters in the presence of platinum metal complexes. Complexes which have proven particularly suitable in this context are those of ruthenium (eq. (15)), such as, for example, cyclooc-tadienylruthenium halides [36], ruthenium carbonyl complexes, and ruthenium acetate complexes [37]. A characteristic feature of these is their high selectivity with regard to acetylene, so that the production of acetylene polymers is reduced. 

An asymmetric C-H insertion using a chiral 3,3, 5,5 -tetrabromosubstituted (salen)manganese(m) complex 107 with TsN=IPh afforded insertion products with ee up to 89%.258 Che reported the first amidation of steroids such as cholesteryl acetate with (salen)ruthenium(n) complexes 108.259... 

Although the ruthenium allenylidene complexes 2 have not yet been as comprehensively studied as their carbene counterparts, they also seem to exhibit a closely related application profile [6]. So far, they have proven to tolerate ethers, esters, amides, sulfonamides, ketones, acetals, glycosides and free secondary hydroxyl groups in the substrates (Table 1). 

Ru(edta)(H20)] reacts very rapidly with nitric oxide (171). Reaction is much more rapid at pH 5 than at low and high pHs. The pH/rate profile for this reaction is very similar to those established earlier for reaction of this ruthenium(III) complex with azide and with dimethylthiourea. Such behavior may be interpreted in terms of the protonation equilibria between [Ru(edtaH)(H20)], [Ru(edta)(H20)], and [Ru(edta)(OH)]2- the [Ru(edta)(H20)] species is always the most reactive. The apparent relative slowness of the reaction of [Ru(edta)(H20)] with nitric oxide in acetate buffer is attributable to rapid formation of less reactive [Ru(edta)(OAc)] [Ru(edta)(H20)] also reacts relatively slowly with nitrite. Laser flash photolysis studies of [Ru(edta)(NO)]-show a complicated kinetic pattern, from which it is possible to extract activation parameters both for dissociation of this complex and for its formation from [Ru(edta)(H20)] . Values of AS = —76 J K-1 mol-1 and A V = —12.8 cm3 mol-1 for the latter are compatible with AS values between —76 and —107 J K-1mol-1 and AV values between —7 and —12 cm3 mol-1 for other complex-formation reactions of [Ru(edta) (H20)]- (168) and with an associative mechanism. In contrast, activation parameters for dissociation of [Ru(edta)(NO)] (AS = —4JK-1mol-1 A V = +10 cm3 mol-1) suggest a dissociative interchange mechanism (172). 

The ruthenium(III) complex of edta in which the ligand acts only as a five-coordinate species and in which an acetate arm remains free, exists in three pH-related forms ... 

Solutions of ruthenium carbonyl complexes in acetic acid solvent under 340 atm of 1 1 H2/CO are stable at temperatures up to about 265°C (166). Reactions at higher temperatures can lead to the precipitation of ruthenium metal and the formation of hydrocarbon products. Bradley has found that soluble ruthenium carbonyl complexes are unstable toward metallization at 271°C under 272 atm of 3 2 H2/CO [109 atm CO partial pressure (165)]. Solutions under these conditions form both methanol and alkanes, products of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis, respectively. Reactions followed with time exhibited an increasing rate of alkane formation corresponding to the decreasing concentration of soluble ruthenium and methanol formation rate. Nevertheless, solutions at temperatures as high as 290°C appear to be stable under 1300 atm of 3 2 H2/CO. 

The ruthenium carbonyl complexes [Ru(CO)2(OCOCH3)] n, Ru3(CO)12, and a new one, tentatively formulated [HRu-(CO)s ] n, homogeneously catalyze the carbonylation of cyclic secondary amines under mild conditions (1 atm, 75°C) to give exclusively the N-formyl products. The acetate polymer dissolves in amines to give [Ru(CO)2(OCOCH3)(amine)]2 dimers. Kinetic studies on piperidine carbonylation catalyzed by the acetate polymer (in neat amine) and the iiydride polymer (in toluene-amine solutions) indicate that a monomeric tricarbonyl species is involved in the mechanism in each case. 

Reaction 4 shows that the ruthenium center with three coordinated carbonyls can transfer one such ligand to the piperidine (presumably coordinated). The mechanism suggested for the acetate complex includes exactly analogous steps (Reactions 6 and 7). The kinetics for the hydride-catalyzed system, however, are quite different and show a first-order dependence in Ru and a more complex dependence on CO (Figure 4). Further, no autocatalysis is evident. 

From a practical standpoint, it is of interest to devise a one-step synthesis of the catalyst. Since both reactions 2 and 3 are ligand substitution reactions, it is quite conceivable that both steps can be carried out at the same time. When we reacted [Ru(COD)Cl2]n with BINAP and sodium acetate in acetic acid, we indeed obtained Ru(BINAP)(OAc)2 in good yields (70-80%). Interestingly, when the reaction was carried out in the absence of sodium acetate, no Ru(BINAP)(OAe)2 was obtained. The product was a mixture of chloro-ruthenium-BINAP complexes. A 3ip NMR study revealed that the mixture contained a major species (3) (31P [ H] (CDCI3) Pi=70.9 ppm P2=58.3 ppm J = 52.5 Hz) which accounted for more than 50% of the ruthenium-phosphine complexes (Figure 2). These complexes appeared to be different from previously characterized and published Ru(BINAP) species (12,13). More interestingly, these mixed complexes were found to catalyze the asymmetric hydrogenation of 2-(6 -methoxy-2 -naphthyl)acrylic acid with excellent rates and enantioselectivities. 

Very recently, the water-soluble binuclear ruthenium allenybdene complex [ RuCl(ju-Cl)(C=C=CPh2)(Ph2P(2-0S(0)2C6H4))2 2] Na4 was used to perform selective transetherification of substituted vinyl ethers into acetals and aldehydes according to the solvent (Scheme 23) [110]. 

C, Carbide, iron complex, 26 246 ruthenium cluster complexes, 26 281-284 CHFiO, Acetic acid, trifluoro-, tungsten complex, 26 222... 

There are two possible pathways to homologate methanol with carbon dioxide the CO2 insertion path and CO insertion path (Scheme 2). As for the former, Fukuoka et al. reported that the cobalt-ruthenium or nickel bimetallic complex catalyzed acetic acid formation from methyl iodide, carbon dioxide and hydrogen, in which carbon dioxide inserted into the carbon-metal bond to form acetate complex [7]. However, the contribution of this path is rather small because no acetic acid or its derivatives are detected in this reaction. Besides, the time course... 

In addition to rhodium phosphane complexes, ruthenium phosphane complexes have also been successfully applied as catalysis for enantioseleetive hydrogenation of 2-acylamino-2-alkenoic acids and esters1 71,72b 3, enol acetates 18 (R = i-Pr E = COOEt X = OCOCH3 98% ee with BINAP)137, and itaeonic acid138. The absolute configuration of the products from the ruthenium-catalyzed reactions shown below is opposite to that obtained with the corresponding rhodium catalysts. 

Preparation. This oxotriruthenium acetate complex is obtained by treating ruthenium trichloride hydrate with acetic acid and sodium acetate in ethanol (1 hr. reflux). It can be purified by crystallization from methanol—acetone. 

The reactions collected in Schemes 56 and 57 contain overwhelming evidence proving that the direction of the addition to alkynyl and alkenyl acetate complexes of osmium and ruthenium is determined by the electronic nature of the metallic center (Os or Ru), by the electronic properties of the ancillary ligands of the complexes, and also by the source of the electrophile. 

C-0 bond cleavage of alkenyl carboxylates such as vinyl and allyl carboxylates can also be achieved by transition metal hydrides. For example, a divalent ruthenium dihydride complex c 5-RuH2(PPh3)4 reacts with vinyl acetate to give c 5-Ru(H)(OAc)(PPh3)4 accompanied by evolution of ethylene (Scheme 3.31)... 

Poly-L-methylethyleneimine-ruthenium(III) (P-L-MEI-Ru(III) complex is capable of catalyzing the asymmetric hydrogenation of methyl acetate in a homogeneous solution [99]. P-UVIEI-Ru(III) complex produces a higher yield of d(-) isomer than the l( + ) isomer, whereas poly-DL-methylethyleneimine-ruthenium(III) complex does not possess almost any selectivity. The main function of a multidentate ligand is to prevent the reduction of Ru(III) to the metallic state. 

---