Rinse Tank Design

Pollution Prevention Tips. 1985. (a) "Water Conservation for Electroplaters Rinse Tank Design" (b) "Water Conservation for Electroplaters Counter-Current Rinsing" (c) "Water Conservation for Electroplaters Rinse Water Reuse." Pollution Prevention Pays Program, North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development. 

Apples. The Rome Beauty apples used in the wash tests were sampled from trees that had received varying amounts of DDT mixtures in as many as six cover sprays. Duplicate or triplicate samples of 30 apples each were taken at random for the residue analyses from the fruit passed through each experimental wash mixture. Additional lots of 30 washed apples each were placed in cold storage for subsequent examinations. Unless otherwise indicated, all washing tests were run in a flood-type washer of recent design (a BADD washer with a heated prewash tank unit, an unheated main tank unit, a water rinse tank unit, and a velour roller dryer unit, manufactured by the Bean-Cutler Division, Food Machinery Corporation, San Jose, Calif.). Surface deposits of DDT were determined as described (10, 12) on samples taken just before and immediately after the washing treatments. 

Like evaporators, RO works on most plating baths and rinse tanks. Most RO systems consist of a housing that contains a membrane and feed pump. There are four basic membrane designs plate-and-frame, spiral-wound, tubular, and hollow-fiber. The most common types of membrane materials are cellulose acetate, polyether/amide, and polysulfones.29... 

These are effective in dealing with the al1-too-human tendency to want to rinse with the cleanest water possible, which is sometimes not necessary in a well-designed rinse system. Placed directly in the inlet to a rinse tank, they restrict the flow to a predetermined level. Once the correct flow is determined, it is a simple matter to keep that flow in place. However, restrictors are non-adjustable, which can be a problem in jobshops with variable work flows. 

Designed to flow in a counter-current fashion, the use of more than a single rinse tank has seen unanimous support in the literature. A multitude of arrangements are possible,[3] and whether or not the effect is to allow dragout recovery, the impact on water use can be remarkable.[6] A three-tank system, for example, can rinse as effectively with. 1 gpm as a single-tank system can with 10 gpm. Especially when combined with earlier options mentioned in this section, product quality should not be impaired. Unfortunately, this option is very difficult to implement in existing operations because of space restrictions. 

An example of post-CMP clean process sequence design for defect reduction is the hybrid clean process as illustrated in Figure 17.25. In this approach, an acidic chemical is used in the roller bmsh steps in sequence to dissolve the metal oxide PR/FM while an alkaline clean chemical is plumbed to the megasonic tank without power to clean off the remaining PR/FM and passivate the Cu surface. In other words, the megasonic clean station is adopted only as a rinse tank with an alkaline chemical solution. The use of acidic clean chemical solution in the bmshes to dissolve metal oxide is the key to the reduction of PR/FM and the ehmination of circular ring defects. The application of a basic chemical rinse step provides further reduction in surface defects and passivation of the Cu surface to prevent the formation of HM and DE defects. 

That s one purpose of the basic design of all vapor degreasers — to keep the solvent in the cleaning and rinsing tanks (baths). If this purpose is unfulfilled, the owner of the vapor degreaser may well (as noted above) become bank-mpt or incarcerated. 

Four auxiliary tanks can be coupled to and operated from the Vinyector s control panel. The tanks can hold solutions for deacidification, bleaching, or rinsing. This system, designed for small workshops with a few technicians, is obviously a slow one for this reason the Center uses only the basic leaf caster. An additional feature of the machine, again for small workshops, is that its chamber can be sealed hermetically and used for fumigation with, for example, commercial mixtures of ethylene oxide and carbon dioxide. 

Many tests of container rinsing performance associated with induction hoppers are conducted with the systems operating with clean water, whereas for many installations on practical sprayers the rinsing of the container uses liquid from the main tank. It is likely that the differences in residue levels associated with rinsing with clean water or tank contents will depend on the nature of the tank mix formulations, as well as on the design of the hopper and the container rinsing system. 

Once the sanitation cycle has been completed, all surfaces must be thoroughly rinsed to flush residual sanitizer and solubilized debris. Tank/hose sanitation is typically followed with citric acid rinse to neutralize residual alkali. The final rinse water should be tested for residual oxidants (Zoeck-lein et al., 1995). This may be done in the laboratory or cellar by use of kits designed for this purpose. 

---