Ribosomes components

The ribosome is the cellular target of a large and chemically diverse group of antibiotics. The antibiotic binding sites are clustered at functional centers of the ribosome and the majority are composed exclusively of RNA. The drugs interfere with the positioning and movement of substrates, products and ribosomal components that are essential for protein synthesis. 

Finally, this section has focused almost entirely on axonal transport, but dendritic transport also occurs [25]. Since dendrites usually include postsynaptic regions while most axons terminate in presynaptic elements, the dendritic and axonal transport each receive a number of unique proteins. An added level of complexity for intraneuronal transport phenomena is the intriguing observation that mRNA is routed into dendrites where it is implicated in local protein synthesis at postsynaptic sites, but ribosomal components and mRNA are largely excluded from axonal domains [26]. Regulation of protein synthesis in dendritic compartments is an important mechanism is synaptic plasticity [27,28]. The importance of dendritic mRNA transport and local protein synthesis is underscored by the demonstration that the mutation associated with Fragile X syndrome affects a protein important for transport and localization of mRNA in dendrites [27, 29], Similar processes of mRNA transport have been described in glial cells [30]. 

In order to place the ribosomal components in the appropriate topography, the size and shape of the ribosomal subunits must be defined. 

One of the most powerful techniques by which protein-protein neighborhoods within the ribosomal particles can be elucidated is neutron scattering. When using this method to determine the relative positions of proteins in the 30 S subunit, the pardcle is reconstituted with two specific proteins that are deuterated whereas all other ribosomal components are in the protonated form (Moore, 1980). The subunits containing the two deuterated proteins give additional contributions to the scattering curves which provide information on the lengths of the vectors between the two deuterated proteins. 

The reconstitution of bacterial ribosomal subunits from the separated rRNAs and proteins, first announced in 1968, provides a potent tool to investigate such essential aspects of ribosome structure and evolution as the subunits assembly pathway [92,93], the locations and neighbourhoods of the subunit proteins [94,95], the roles of the individual proteins in both assembly and function [92,93,96], and the degree of exchangeability of ribosomal components both within and across domain boundaries [97,98]. 

The development of protocols for the reconstitution of archaeal ribosomal subunits has disclosed the possibility of determining the degree of compatibility between ribosomal components from evolutionarily disparate organisms. The evidence accumulated so far is reviewed below. 

Interchangeability of ribosomal components from different organisms... 

The major components of the nucleus include the chromosomes, the nucleolus, the nucleoplasm, and the nuclear cortex. Chromosomes are made of DNA the nucleolus manufactures ribosomal components and the nucleoplasm is the fluid and filaments inside the nucleus. The nuclear cortex is a dense area on the inner face of the nucleus, which tethers the chromosomes in place when the cell is not undergoing division. 

The formation of an ADP-ribosylated derivative of eEF-2 affects the three-dimensional structure of this protein factor. Presumably protein synthesis is arrested because the ability of eEF-2 to interact with or bind to one or more ribosomal components is altered. 

In spite of considerable research effort, the nature of the enzymic activity of the A chain remains uncertain. Toxin-dependent changes in the RNA or protein moieties of 60 S ribosomal subunits have not been described. Since A chain inactivates ribosomes in the absence of cofactors, it may act hydrolytically, possibly by removing some minor functional group [120], or may introduce a lethal conformational change in a ribosomal component. 

The ribosome receptor and translocation complex facilitate protein translocation into the lumen of the ER, where a signal peptidase cleaves the signal peptide. Both the SRP and ribosomal components are recycled back into the cytoplasm. 

The yield is defined as the percentage of ribosome-bound tRNA that reacts covalently with ribosomal components. 

This approach has been successful in a number of affinity labeling experiments. The basic protocol requires using both a pep-tRNA and an aa-tRNA. One of them has a radioactive amino acid (alternatively, the two amino acid moieties may be labeled with different radioisotopes) the other has an electrophilic or photoactivatable group attached to the side chain or the -amino nitrogen of the amino acid. The pep-tRNA is bound to ribosomes under conditions that favor binding to the P site. If this tRNA contains the affinity or photoaffinity label, reaction with the ribosomal components is allowed to proceed. Then the aa-tRNA is added to the incubation, and a peptide bond is allowed to form between the two aminoacyl moieties. Alternatively, the reactive probe may be attached to the aa-tRNA. Since peptide bond formation follows rapidly upon binding, the covalent reaction of the probe with ribosomal components presumably occurs after peptide transfer. 

After both covalent reaction and peptide bond formation have occurred, the ribosomal components are separated and analyzed for the presence of radioactivity. Since the probe moiety is nonradioactive (or has a different radioisotope), the only way in which radioactivity can become covalently linked to a ribosomal component is through (i) a covalent reaction between a ribosomal component and an aminoacyl-probe moiety, and (ii) peptide bond formation between that same aminoacyl-probe moiety and a radioactive aminoacyl moiety. In this way analogs of peptidyl-tRNA, aa-tRNA, and puromycin have been shown to function both as affinity labels and as peptide bond donors or acceptors. 

This unique feature of the ribosome greatly obstructs the identification of ribosomal components directly located at specific active centers, and it renders difficult the distinction between directly and indirectly involved components. One approach that in principle circumvents this difficulty is based on the method of affinity labeling. Employing to date several classes of chemically or photoreactive site-specific ligands, this method has been applied to identify ribosomal components located within close range of several functional sites on the Escherichia coli ribosome. 

Analysis of Modified Ribosomal Components. As a general rule in affinity labeling of ribosomes, excess of reagent was removed from the labeled ribosomes before any fractionation was attempted, to avoid any reaction from taking place after the structure of the ribosome had been disrupted. In cases in which 70 S ribosomes were labeled, the first step was normally the dissociation into subimits and determination of label... 

Affinity labeling probes for mapping of ribosomal components involved in interactions of the first type were constructed by introducing suitable substituents at the free terminal amino group of aminoacyl or peptidyl tRNA. To study the second class interactions, sites within the tRNA molecule must be rendered capable of reacting with potential binding sites on the ribosome. Most studies to date have centered on the elucidation of ribosomal components involved in peptidyl transfer. Attempts at unraveling components involved in the second class of interactions are still very few. 

Analysis of Modified Ribosomal Components. The nature of affinity labeling probes discussed in this section poses a special problem in analy-... 

In a considerable number of cases, peptidyl-tRNA affinity probes were shown to modify primarily not the ribosomal proteins, but the 23 S rRNA. Further characterization of modified sites was obtained by splitting of the 23 S rRNA into 13 S and 18 S fragments including the 5 third and the 3 two-thirds of the molecule, respectively. Mapping of tRNA Binding Sites. Identification of ribosomal components interacting with parts of tRNA other than the 3 end has been attempted by preparing tRNAs derivatized in odd bases with photosensitive residues. Affinity probes are listed in Table III. Assays for func-... 

Analysis of Modified Ribosomal Components. All reagents, except for reagent f, modified ribosomal proteins. While some derivatives reacted at a limited number of sites (48-50), the others reacted with a large number of components. Modified proteins were identified by gel electrophoresis techniques. 

In unpublished experiments it has been shown that irradiation with each of the two photoaffinity labeling reagents resulted in the irreversible inactivation of peptidyltransferase. The presence of erythromycin in the irradiation mixture with p-azidochloramphenicol protected against inactivation. It thus appears that these analogs react w ith the ribosome at functionally significant sites. The modified ribosomal components in these two cases have not been identified, however. 

Aminoacyl- and peptidyl-tRNA are the natural substrates of ribo-somal peptidyltransferase. Derivatives of these substrates modified chemically or with photoreactive groups can therefore be used as affinity labeling reagents for the location of ribosomal components at, or close to, the peptidyltransferase active center. 

---