Responsibilities in management

The design management for a nuclear power plant shall ensure that the struc-trrres, systems and components important to safety have the appropriate characteristics, specifications and material composition so that the safety functions can be performed and the plant can operate safely with the necessary reliability for the full duration of its design life, with accident prevention and protection of site personnel, the public and the envirorrment as prime objectives. 

The design management shall take account of the results of the deterministic and complementary probabilistic safety analyses, so that an iterative process takes place by means of which it shall be ensured that due consideration has been given to the prevention of accidents and mitigation of their consequences. 

The design management shall ensure that the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the minimum practicable, in terms of both activity and volume, by appropriate design measures and operational and decommissioning practices. 

---

Parents had different concerns at different developmental points, for example, when children were young parents keenly felt the burden of responsibility in managing risk in their children s lives, but were less... 

How is responsibility in managing risks divided - between say regulators, companies, the Lander, NGO and other groups/the general public ... 

American Pharmaceutical Association Phamiaci.sLs Responsibilities in Managing Opioids A Resource. Washington. DC. American Phur maceutical Association. 2002. 

The relationship between (MSF), p, and 17 in Eq. (9-106) is shown graphically in Fig. 9-27. It is the responsibility of management to decide on an acceptable value of the (MSF) for its company. The value chosen will depend on the company s attitude to risk that can be quantified in the form of a utihty curve such as the one shown in Fig. 9-25, from which a value of equivalent (MSF) can be obtained. 

Site-specific health and safety requirements and site personnel, including contractors, are typically held responsible for managing and conducting all activities safely. Every worker should understand that he or she is responsible for sharing in the commitment to a safe workplace. In addition, employees should perform their work in accordance with any applicable laws, regulations, contract provisions, and established site-specific requirements. 

Job descriptions or job profiles are useful in describing what a person is responsible for however, it rather depends upon the reason for having them as to whether they will be of any use in managing quality. Those produced for job evaluation, recruitment, salary grading, etc. may be of use in the quality system if they specify the objectives people are responsible for achieving and the decisions they are authorized to take. 

An organization may respond to these requirements in several ways, so in managing the quality system a list of the documents is needed which contains the definition of people s responsibilities and authority. The difficulty arises in keeping all such documents compatible and so it is often better to limit the documents to the three types above, if possible. 

If an element has no system at all, it may indicate that the facility manager does not fully understand what the element requires, or is for some reason unable to cany his/her responsibilities. In addition, a weakness in corporate oversight, direction, or resource allocation may contribute to the problem. Either way, the plan you develop must take these gaps into account. 

Fundamental knowledge about regulation of the HS response holds great promise for clinical applications. The HS paradigm is an excellent example of how basic science questions can eventually merge with clinical questions, leading to novel approaches in managing human disease. 

Mentees are in charge of the relationship for example, they are responsible for managing their own learning they... 

Irrespective of whether your program employs relationship supervisors to deal with relationship problems or not, the coordinator will always have the final responsibility for managing difficult situations. Since the same principles apply to the program co-ordinator as to the relationship supervisor regarding this subject, you might want to structure the training in similar ways. 

In any study involving analyses, part of the responsibility of management at the analytical laboratory is the review and approval of intermediate and final reported results. In an LSMBS, such review and approval must take place at each analytical laboratory involved in the study. However, different laboratories may focus on different aspects of the analyses, and some means to ensure that review procedures and approaches are consistent among the laboratories is needed. It is advisable, therefore, to include an additional review, termed here an external review , beyond that conducted by the individual laboratories. 

---