Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Response functions derivation

In this chapter we surveyed the theoretical analysis of resonant multidimensional spectroscopies generated by the interaction of 3 fs pulses with a Frenkel exciton system. Closed expressions for the time-domain third-order response function derived by solving the NEE are given in terms of various exciton Green functions. Alternatively, the multidimensional time-domain signal can be calculated starting from the frequency domain the third-order... [Pg.387]

By choosing different operators for A, B. C and D in the expressions for the response functions derived in Are previous section a wide range of different properties can be calculated. Tire most common example being the (hyper)polarizability were all operators are electric dipole moment operators. In this section we will present sample calculations of a few out of great many properties that are available from response functions. [Pg.183]

Calculations of analytic excited state properties for correlated methods have been reported by several groups [107-118]. Excited state dynamic properties from cubic response theory were first obtained by Norman et al. at the SCF level [55] and by Jonsson et al. at the MCSCF [56] level, and in a subsequent study a polarizable continuum model was applied to account for solvation effects [119]. Hattlg et al. presented a general theory for excited state response functions at the CC level using a quasi-energy formulation [120] which was subsequently implemented and applied at the CCSD level [121, 122]. The first ID DFT calculation of dynamic excited state polarizabilities, which we will shortly review here, was presented in [58] for pyrimidine and -tetrazine utilizing the double residue of the cubic response function derived in Section 2.7.3. [Pg.191]

Using the spectral from of the quadratic response function derived in Section III (Eq. (35)) we find (Dalgaard, 1982)... [Pg.211]

The linewidth broadening parameter may be incorporated into the response function derived by Baker et al. (their Equations 9 and 12). It relates the area under the spectral line profile Area, measured at 2o), to the spectroscopic parameters and the ratio m of Equation 6.2 above through a term 5 = (1 +... [Pg.109]

The U.S. EPA risk assessment based its concentration—response function derivations on the international pooled analysis of Lanphear et al. (2005). Specifically, log-linear concentration—response functions for IQ loss were developed for two dose metrics concurrent PbB and lifetime average PbB. The pooled analysis determined the concurrent PbB metric to be more robust versus the lifetime average exposure indicator. [Pg.812]

That means, the derivation of the measured step response h(x) along the path x delivers the impulse response function g(x) of the system. [Pg.366]

In the next section we derive the Taylor expansion of the coupled cluster cubic response function in its frequency arguments and the equations for the required expansions of the cluster amplitude and Lagrangian multiplier responses. For the experimentally important isotropic averages 7, 7i and yx we give explicit expressions for the A and higher-order coefficients in terms of the coefficients of the Taylor series. In Sec. 4 we present an application of the developed approach to the second hyperpolarizability of the methane molecule. We test the convergence of the hyperpolarizabilities with respect to the order of the expansion and investigate the sensitivity of the coefficients to basis sets and correlation treatment. The results are compared with dispersion coefficients derived by least square fits to experimental hyperpolarizability data or to pointwise calculated hyperpolarizabilities of other ab inito studies. [Pg.114]

In the derivation of response functions one considers a molecule or an atom described by the time-independent Hamiltonian which is perturbed by an external one-electron perturbation V t e). [Pg.114]

The response functions are obtained as derivatives of the real part of the time-averaged quasienergy Lagrangian ... [Pg.118]

As a consequence of the time-averaging of the quasienergy Lagrangian, the derivative in the last equation gives only a nonvanishing result if the frequencies of the external fields fulfill the matching condition Wj = 0. In fourth order Eq. (29) gives the cubic response function ... [Pg.118]

In the limit of small pressure perturbations, any kinetic equation modeling the response of a catalyst surface can be reduced to first order. Following Yasuda s derivation C, the system can be described by a set of functions which describe the dependence of pressure, coverage amplitude, and phase on T, P, and frequency. After a mass balance, the equations can be separated Into real and Imaginary terms to yield a real response function, RRF, and an Imaginary response function, IRF ... [Pg.68]

Combining the dose-response function with the exposure/blood level relations, Spadaro and Rabl [41] derived two possible characterization factors of 0.268 and 0.59 IQ points decrement per kg emitted Pb. [Pg.130]

All the hexakis(ligand) Fe(II) materials derived from isoxazole, 1-alkyl-tetrazole and 4-R-1,2,4-triazole exhibit very favourable Fe(II) spin crossover response functions, which make them the likely compounds of choice for various applications in molecular electronics. The interconversion from low-spin... [Pg.159]

Differential equations and solutions for some response functions will be stated for the elementary models with the main kinds of inputs. Since the DEs are linear, solutions by Laplace Transform are feasible. Details are to be provided by the solved problems which include derivations and applications,... [Pg.505]

Responses Cg to inputs to several vessels are represented by the figures and the tabulation [for case (e)]. Various response functions will be derived with the formulas of Table 5.2. The equations for Cg are as follows ... [Pg.527]

In the last three decades, density functional theory (DFT) has been extensively used to generate what may be considered as a general approach to the description of chemical reactivity [1-5]. The concepts that emerge from this theory are response functions expressed basically in terms of derivatives of the total energy and of the electronic density with respect to the number of electrons and to the external potential. As such, they correspond to conceptually simple, but at the same time, chemically meaningful quantities. [Pg.8]

The SP-DFT has been shown to be useful in the better understanding of chemical reactivity, however there is still work to be done. The usefulness of the reactivity indexes in the p-, p representation has not been received much attention but it is worth to explore them in more detail. Along this line, the new experiments where it is able to separate spin-up and spin-down electrons may be an open field in the applications of the theory with this variable set. Another issue to develop in this context is to define response functions of the system associated to first and second derivatives of the energy functional defined by Equation 10.1. But the challenge in this case would be to find the physical meaning of such quantities rather than build the mathematical framework because this is due to the linear dependence on the four-current and external potential. [Pg.151]

Both A and Ap(r) depend on the perturbation 8ucxl(r). The linear response x (Equation 24.4) is obtained by functional derivative of Equation 24.44 ... [Pg.346]

The frontier orbitals responses (or bare Fukui functions) f (r) and the Kohn-Sham Fukui functions (or screened Fukui functions)/, (r) are related by Dyson equations obtained by using the PRF and its inverse [32]. Indeed, by using Equation 24.57 and the chain rule for functional derivatives in Equation 24.36, one obtains... [Pg.351]

On the other hand, functional derivatives of the Bethe-Salpeter equation allows to evaluate the nonlinear responses using the interaction kernels h only (which depend on the Hartree and exchange-correlation energies). The relations between the screened nonlinear responses and the bare ones are derived by using nonlinear PRF [32],... [Pg.358]

The relations between the polarization chemical electronic responses (fpn r), 7]p. ..) and the polarizability responses Xn are similar to the exact equations we derived earlier when fp(r) is defined by Equation 24.50 [26]. For instance, the expression of the first nonlinear hardness 17 is obtained by deriving the linear equation (Equation 24.50) relative to A, and by using again the chain mle for functional derivatives ... [Pg.359]

This chapter will be concerned with computing the three response functions discussed above—the chemical potential, the chemical hardness, and the Fukui function—as reliably as possible for a neutral molecule in the gas phase. This involves the evaluation of the derivative of the energy and electron density with respect to the number of electrons. [Pg.541]

All the methods used in this study are response methods. They deserihe the response of an ohservahle sueh as an eleetrie dipole moment /I or quadrupole moment to an external or internal perturhation, e.g., an eleetrie field or field gradient. Response funetions originated in various diseiplines in physies. In statistieal physies, they were used as time-eorrelation functions in the form of Green s functions [44,45]. Linderherg and Ohrn first showed the usefulness of this idea for quantum chemistry [46]. Since then response functions have been derived for many types of electronic wavefunctions. Four of these methods are employed here. [Pg.188]

They reduce to regular energy derivatives in the static limit [48,50]. The linear response function... [Pg.393]

From this equation it follows that dg,A Pa is diagonal in the spin indices. We will therefore in the following put density variation 5p (r) determines the potential variation 5vs,(r) only up to a constant (see also [66] ). To find an explicit expression for the above functional derivative we must find an expression for the inverse density response function i A. In order to do this we make the following approximation to the Greens function (see Sharp and Horton [39], Krieger et al. [21]) ... [Pg.128]


See other pages where Response functions derivation is mentioned: [Pg.298]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.128]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.118 ]




SEARCH



Derivative function

Derivatives response function approach

Derivatives response functions

Derivatives response functions

Derived responses

Function derived

Response function time-derivative

Response functions

© 2024 chempedia.info