Resource allocation list

For some devices (resources) one wishes to know their future allocation at any point in time over a given time interval (planning horizon). For this purpose one can use a resource allocation list that lists all operations from process orders that use the resource. The resource allocation list is visualized by bar graphs (Gantt chart, original version defined around from 1900 by Henry Laurence Gantt). 

Resource allocations list the types of personnel to be involved in the study, the estimated number of hours/FTEs for each skill level and the fee charged for each skill level (see the resource allocations worksheet described below). 

In this work, the continuous-time MILP model previously presented [5] was restructured, and a novel computational procedure (Pre-Analysis) is proposed. The Pre-Analysis uses information provided by the Resource Allocation (batch sequencing) unit. Based on the list of demanded batches supplied by this unit, the Pre-Analysis calculates a series of temporal and volume parameters (bounds). The underlying idea here is to provide structured sequences (not necessarily optimal) in a reasonable computation time. As an advantage of this approach, the computational burden to generate the minimum temporal blocks (pumping and receipt times) is removed from the MILP model. Furthermore, the complexity of the temporal constraints may vary from scenario to scenario,... 

The resource allocations enable the sponsor to make a more critical evaluation of a proposal than if the cost of each service was simply listed. In both these examples, the cost of writing a protocol is about 52 000. However, most sponsors would agree that the team approach is highly preferable to assigning the task to an individual physician. Without the resource allocations data, the sponsor would not have been able to differentiate between the two proposals. 

As discussed in Sect. 8.2.2.3, there must be a request for the exam in the RIS before it can appear on a work list. Each individual modality may get its own work lists (provided resource allocation is performed into sufficient detail in the computer system) or all modalities of a group may share the same list. 

Develop Top Ten bad actors list The purpose of the bad actors list is to establish the analyzers within the facility that shall receive priority for resource allocation determination. These resources include preventive maintenance, spare parts, reliability study, and necessary training for technicians and operators. The Top Ten bad actors list ranks the importance based on the following three categories ... 

Another way of interpreting absolute risk estimates is through the use of benchmarks or goals. Consider a company that operates 50 chemical process facilities. It is determined (through other, purely qualitative means) that Plant A has exhibited acceptable safety performance over the years. A QRA is performed on Plant A, and the absolute estimates are established as calibration points, or benchmarks, for the rest of the firm s facilities. Over the years, QRAs are performed on other facilities to aid in making decisions about safety maintenance and improvement. As these studies are completed, the results are carefully scrutinized against the benchmark facility. The frequency/consequence estimates are not the only results compared—the lists of major risk contributors, the statistical risk importance of safety systems, and other types of QRA results are also compared. As more and more facility results are accumulated, resources are allocated to any plant areas that are out of line with respect to the benchmark facility. 

Then compare the resource list with the staff allocation estimate, as shown in Figure 5-11. The gaps that emeige from this comparison represent areas for the team to examine closely and determine how best to address them. Some of the points the team should consider include ... 

Traditionally, in pursuit of their structure-activity relationships, medicinal chemists had focused almost exclusively on finding compounds with greater and greater potency. However, these SARs often ended up with compounds that were unsuitable for development as pharmaceutical products. These compounds would be too insoluble in water, or were not orally bioavailable, or were eliminated too quickly or too slowly from mammalian bodies. Pharmacologists and pharmaceutical development scientists for years had tried to preach the need for medicinal chemists to also think about other factors that determined whether a compound could be a medicine. Table 1.1 lists a number of factors that determine whether a potent compound has what it takes to become a drug. Experimentally, it was difficult to quantitate these other factors. Often, the necessary manpower resources would not be allocated to a compound until it had already been selected for project team status. 

Determining the potential for hazards to result in an accident (risk assessment) is frequently part of the identification step (see chapter 11). This list of potential hazards and their risk is used during the evaluation and control phase of the project. Resources for evaluating the hazards and developing control methods are allocated on a priority basis, giving the appropriate time and attention to the most significant hazards. 

Other companies and personnel may encounter similar pitfalls. The list is not intended to be exhaustive but merely to indicate areas in which additional time, money, and resources will be allocated. However, on the positive side, benefits can be seen immediately. 

Key operational components of an information technology plan include provision for maintenance of current systems. Software maintenance costs alone can typically run from 18 to 22 percent of software list prices and the qualified human resources necessary to support installed systems. Typically, information technologies in health care systems are either undeiihinded or place an unreasonable emphasis on administrative systems. An allocation of iq) to 6 percent of the annual operating budget for information systems is not unrealistic. A summary of contemporary infoimation systems is included in the Table 37.3. 

The process creates a list of hazards from the analysis of scenarios organized according to the combination of ratings established in the hazard totem pole. The list forms priorities for allocating funds to correct the hazards. The list can include the cost to correct each hazard. One compares the cumulative cost as one moves down the list to funds included in a budget. Managers have limited resources and are not likely to have funds to correct every hazard in the list. They must decide how far down the list a budget reaches. At some point there is a cutoff. Funds will not support items below the cutoff line. 

From this type of quantitative evaluation, a list of priorities for risk control can be established, and used as a basis to allocate resources. 

The physical structure of the simulation hospital, as with any simulation center, integrates three different space types clinical and nonclinical simulation, educational, and supportive services [5]. The simulation hospital consists of different departments that mirror a real hospital. The list of these departments varies depending on the areas of interest of the institutions, population catchment, and the need for specific SBE. The area allocated to each department depends on many factors, including training needs, avadabiHty of simulation in that specific area, experience with curriculum development, allocated space for the whole project, and financial resources. In this section, the surgical simulation wiU be discussed in more details given the scope of this book. 

In life cyde assessments, the problem arises that production systems may have more than one output. For instance, mineral oil refinery processes may generate not only feedstock for polymer production but also gasoline, kerosene, heavy fuel oil, and bitumen. In the case of multi-output processes, extractions of resources and emissions have to be allocated to the different outputs. There are several ways to do so [31]. Major ways to allocate are based on physical units (in the case of refineries, for example, energy content, hydrogen content, or weight of outputs) or on monetary value (price). There may also be allocation on the basis of substitution. In the latter case, the environmental burden of a coproduct is established on the basis of another similar product. Different kinds of allocation may lead to different outcomes of life cyde inventories. The outcome of the inventory stage is a list with all extractions of resources and emissions of substances causally linked to the functional unit considered. 

---