Resolution peak purity

UV (DAD) High resolution Component identity Peak purity testing Robust Limited to UV absorbing analytes Wide variability in compound absorptivities [31,48]... 

Since IRMS is a single-parameter chromatographic detector incapable of speciation, GC-IRMS places severe demands on the chromatographic resolution to guarantee peak purity [631,632]. This is sometimes checked by splitting the effluent between the IRMS and a conventional El mass spectrometer [633]. 

Having optimised the efficiency of a chromatographic separation the quality of the chromatography can be controlled by applying certain system suitability tests. One of these is the calculation of theoretical plates for a column and there are two other main parameters for assessing performance peak symmetry and the resolution between critical pairs of peaks. A third performance test, the peak purity parameter, can be applied where two-dimensional detectors such as diode or coulometric array or mass spectrometry detectors are being used. The reproducibility of peak retention times is also an important parameter for controlling performance. 

Critical separations in chromatography should be investigated at an appropriate level. For critical separations, selectivity can be demonstrated by the resolution of the two components that elute closest to each other. Peak purity tests using diode array or mass spectrometric detectors may be useful to show that the analyte chromatographic peak is not attributable to more than one component. 

Alternatively, the results from the gradient runs for each sample can be inputted into Drylab, ACD, or Chromsword for further optimization (see Sections 8.5.6.11). For the predicted experimental conditions (i.e., gradient slope, temperature, flow rate), if desired selectivity and resolution can be obtained, an experiment can be run for verification. The peak purity for the main analyte (MS and DAD detection) should be checked in the verification run. If the desired selectivity and/or the target analyte are not spectrally homogeneous, go to Step 6, Figure 8-37. 

The above statement has lot of details in reference to what is a SIM The statement starts with method validation (refer to Chapter 9). Next, most methods need to be specific (specificity, resolution of active from related substances, peak purity), reproducible (precision), quantitative (recovery, linearity, LOD, LOQ), and able to monitor a change in chemical, physical, and/or microbiological properties of drug products over time (refer to sections on stability testing and mass balance). 

The greater the value of R, greater is the separation. For an R value of 1.00, solute purity is about 97.7% if each peak is Gaussian. In practice to attain a peak purity of 99.8 /o or greater a resolution of 1.50 is required. 

Easy recognition of the two peaks over a wide range of relative concentrations is possible for Rs = l and this is essentially the practical minimum resolution desirable. It is usually stated that R = 1 corresponds to a peak purity of about 98% however, this is correct only for equal concentrations of the two solutes. As the ratio of relative concentrations of the two solutes deviates from 1, the recovery of the lower concentration solute at a given level of purity becomes poorer. 

Peak purity analysis software allows users to sample spectra at equidistant points across an HPLC peak. In general, the poorer the resolution between potentially coeluting peaks is, the more desirable it is to use greater numbers of data points to detect the impurity. Traditionally, spectra have been sampled upslope, at the apex, and downslope of the eluted peak. This selection pattern may overlook the presence of impurities near the peak extremities. However, acquisition of many spectra may increase calculation and display time without adding significant information. 

Specificity Analyte + placebo, synthesis intermediates, exdpients, degradation impurities versus pure analyte. Peak purity and resolution assessed. Resolution >1.5... 

Specific detection is an analytical determination based on specific responses related to the chemical characteristics of a molecule excited by a certain type of irradiation. In this detection method, measurement of the molecule of interest may usually be performed without separation from matrix materials or from other ingredients if appropriate instrumental adjustments are made. The need for identification and structure elucidation for newly discovered compounds drives the progress of specific detection techniques with NMR and X-ray diffraction and MS. The UV-diode array detector often aids the recognition of chromatographic peak purity, ensuring complete resolution of a separation procedure. 

Andrews, R. W. and Richardson, H. Effect of spectral resolution, detector linearity and chromatographic resolution on peak purity calculations. J. Chromatogr. 683 3-8, 1994. 

The evaluation of the peak purity as a selectivity criterion is a fundamental issue deserving thorough attention. If peaks are found to be heterogeneous, chemometric methods based on curve resolution can be used to isolate the pure analyte contributions from a mixture system, thus making possible an accurate quantification of components (16). 

Data matrices (two-way data). Electrophoretic data resulting from multiway detectors, such as in CE-DAD and CE-MS techniques, can be arranged in a table of values or a data matrix. Data are structured over the two domains of measurement, in which each column corresponds to a wavelength (or m/q ratio) and each row corresponds to a time point. Two-way data can be exploited for studies of peak purity and mixture resolution using curve resolution and related factor analysis methods. 

Multivariate curve resolution can be used for the analysis of augmented sets as a way of reinforcing conclusions on peak purity, improving the resolution of overlapping compounds, and performing multicomponent determinations in the presence of interferences. 

FIGURE 9.10. Evaluation of the peak purity of the putrescine-tryptamine system, (a) Experimental data set (b) Determination of the number of components by SVD (c) Study of impurities by window factor analysis (arrows indicate the time points at which spectra have been taken to be used as initial estimations and (d) Results of the resolution of the data set by MCR-ALS. 

---