Laminar flow residence time distribution

The polymerization time in continuous processes depends on the time the reactants spend in the reactor. The contents of a batch reactor will all have the same residence time, since they are introduced and removed from the vessel at the same times. The continuous flow tubular reactor has the next narrowest residence time distribution, if flow in the reactor is truly plug-like (i.e., not laminar). These two reactors are best adapted for achieving high conversions, while a CSTR cannot provide high conversion, by definition of its operation. The residence time distribution of the CSTR contents is broader than those of the former types. A cascade of CSTR s will approach the behavior of a plug flow continuous reactor. 

Exercise 9.9.4. Show that the distribution function of residence times for laminar flow in a tubular reactor has the form 2z /Zp, where tp is the time of passage of any fluid annulus and the minimum time of passage. Diffusion and entrance effects may be neglected. Hence show that the fractional conversion to be expected in a second order reaction with velocity constant k is 2B[1 + j lnu5/(5 + 1)] where B = akt n and a is the initial concentration of both reactants. (C.U.)... 

Residence Time Distribution For laminar Newtonian pipe flow, the cumulative residence time distribution F(0) is given by... 

Economic Pipe Diameter, Laminar Flow Pipehnes for the transport of high-viscosity liquids are seldom designed purely on the basis of economics. More often, the size is dictated oy operability considerations such as available pressure drop, shear rate, or residence time distribution. Peters and Timmerhaus (ibid.. Chap. 10) provide an economic pipe diameter chart for laminar flow. For non-Newtouiau fluids, see SkeUand Non-Newtonian Flow and Heat Transfer, Chap. 7, Wiley, New York, 1967). 

A model of a reaction process is a set of data and equations that is believed to represent the performance of a specific vessel configuration (mixed, plug flow, laminar, dispersed, and so on). The equations include the stoichiometric relations, rate equations, heat and material balances, and auxihaiy relations such as those of mass transfer, pressure variation, contac ting efficiency, residence time distribution, and so on. The data describe physical and thermodynamic properties and, in the ultimate analysis, economic factors. 

Topics that acquire special importance on the industrial scale are the quality of mixing in tanks and the residence time distribution in vessels where plug flow may be the goal. The information about agitation in tanks described for gas/liquid and slurry reactions is largely apphcable here. The relation between heat transfer and agitation also is discussed elsewhere in this Handbook. Residence time distribution is covered at length under Reactor Efficiency. A special case is that of laminar and related flow distributions characteristic of non-Newtonian fluids, which often occiu s in polymerization reactors. 

RESIDENCE TIME DISTRIBUTION FOR A LAMINAR FLOW TUBULAR REACTOR... 

Laminar Flow without Diffusion. Section 8.1.3 anticipated the use of residence time distributions to predict the yield of isothermal, homogeneous reactions, and... 

FIGURE 15.9 Residence time distribution for laminar flow in a circular tube (a) physical representation b) washout function. 

In the absence of diffusion, all hydrodynamic models show infinite variances. This is a consequence of the zero-slip condition of hydrodynamics that forces Vz = 0 at the walls of a vessel. In real systems, molecular diffusion will ultimately remove molecules from the stagnant regions near walls. For real systems, W t) will asymptotically approach an exponential distribution and will have finite moments of all orders. However, molecular diffusivities are low for liquids, and may be large indeed. This fact suggests the general inappropriateness of using to characterize the residence time distribution in a laminar flow system. Turbulent flow is less of a problem due to eddy diffusion that typically results in an exponentially decreasing tail at fairly low multiples of the mean residence time. 

Micromixing Models. Hydrodynamic models have intrinsic levels of micromixing. Examples include laminar flow with or without diffusion and the axial dispersion model. Predictions from such models are used directly without explicit concern for micromixing. The residence time distribution corresponding to the models could be associated with a range of micromixing, but this would be inconsistent with the physical model. 

The pilot reactor is a tube in isothermal, laminar flow, and molecular diffusion is negligible. The larger reactor wiU have the same value for t and will remain in laminar flow. The residence time distribution will be unchanged by the scaleup. If diffusion in the small reactor did have an influence, it wiU lessen upon scaleup, and the residence time distribution will approach that for the diffusion-free case. This wiU hurt yield and selectivity. 

This is the first reactor reported where the aim was to form micro-channel-like conduits not by employing microfabrication, but rather using the void space of structured packing from smart, precise-sized conventional materials such as filaments (Figure 3.25). In this way, a structured catalytic packing was made from filaments of 3-10 pm size [8]. The inner diameter of the void space between such filaments lies in the range of typical micro channels, so ensuring laminar flow, a narrow residence time distribution and efficient mass transfer. 

For a few highly idealized systems, the residence time distribution function can be determined a priori without the need for experimental work. These systems include our two idealized flow reactors—the plug flow reactor and the continuous stirred tank reactor—and the tubular laminar flow reactor. The F(t) and response curves for each of these three types of well-characterized flow patterns will be developed in turn. 

In a laminar flow reactor (LFR), we assume that one-dimensional laminar flow (LF) prevails there is no mixing in the (axial) direction of flow (a characteristic of tubular flow) and also no mixing in the radial direction in a cylindrical vessel. We assume LF exists between the inlet and outlet of such a vessel, which is otherwise a closed vessel (Section 13.2.4). These and other features of LF are described in Section 2.5, and illustrated in Figure 2.5. The residence-time distribution functions E(B) and F(B) for LF are derived in Section 13.4.3, and the results are summarized in Table 13.2. 

Figure 8-5 Residence time distribution in a laminar flow tubular reactor. The dashed curve indicates the p t) curve expected in laminar flow after allowing for radial diffusion, which makes p(t) closer to the plug flow.

A characteristic of micro-channel reactors is their narrow residence-time distribution. This is important, for example, to obtain clean products. This property is not imaginable without the influence of dispersion. Considering only the laminar flow would... 

In macroscopic reactors, knowledge of the velocity profile in the channel cross-section is a necessary and sufficient prerequisite to describe the material transport. In microscopic dimensions down to a few micrometers, diffusion also has to be considered. In fact, without the influence of diffusion, extremely broad residence time distributions would be found because of the laminar flow conditions. Superposition of convection and diffusion is called dispersion. Taylor [91] was among the first to notice this strong dominating effect in laminar flow. It is possible to transfer his deduction to rectangular channels. A complete fluid dynamic description has been given of the flow, including effects such as the influence of the wall, the aspect ratio and a chemical wall reaction on the concentration field in the cross-section [37]. 

A characteristic of micro channel reactors is their narrow residence-time distribution. This is important, for example, to obtain clean products. This property is not imaginable without the influence of dispersion. Just considering the laminar flow would deliver an extremely wide residence-time distribution. The near wall flow is close to stagnation because a fluid element at the wall of the channel is, by definition, fixed to the wall for an endlessly long time, in contrast to the fast core flow. The phenomenon that prevents such a behavior is the known dispersion effect and is demonstrated in Figure 3.88. 

One reason to use micro structured reaction chambers is certainly the possibility of describing the fluid dynamic behavior in these structures due to the laminar flow regime. With the following calculations the reactive gas flow in a square micro structure with coated catalytically active walls will be studied in detail. The task was to find a channel arrangement and to calculate the residence time distribution of this arrangement numerically (Figure 4.93). 

A graphical representation of the cumulative residence time distribution function is given in Figure 4.97 for a structured well, a laminar flow reactor and an ideal plug flow reactor assuming the same average residence time and mean velocity in each reactor. 

Figure 4.97 Calculated cumulative residence time distribution function for a multi-channel well, a laminar flow reactor and a plug flow reactor [147] (by courtesy of VDI-Verlag GmbH).

Example 7.8 Residence Time Distribution Functions in Fully Developed Laminar Flow of a Newtonian Fluid in a Pipe The velocity distribution... 

Figure 8-23. Residence time distribution for tubular laminar flow.

---