Reproducibility direct quantitative evaluation

As indicated in Section 6.2.2, DI-CIMS suffers from poor reproducibility. For nonvolatile additives that do not evaporate up to 350 °C, direct quantitative analysis by thermal desorption is not possible. The method depends on polymer formulation standards that are reliably mixed. Wilcken and Geissler [264] described rapid quality control of l- xg paint samples by means of temperature-programmable DI-EIMS with PCA evaluation. 

Perhaps the most widely misunderstood aspect of gauge development is the role of the controlled shock-compression experiment in the development process. It is often stated that the gauges are being calibrated. In fact, it is not possible to calibrate a gauge that must be used over the wide range of conditions and over the wide range of wave profiles encountered and is destroyed in use. Only in special cases of shocks to fixed conditions is the response measured for a gauge in controlled experiments directly a suitable calibration. Even in the direct shock experiment, the controlled shock-compression experiment serves as a shock calibration only if the reproducibility of materials in the sensor is evaluated quantitatively and a persistent reproducible materials source is available. 

In general the assays systems currently used for clinical, technical or laboratory purposes are based on coupled enzymic test systems. Attributable to the many possibilities of interference between the particular components, the results obtained by these assay systems are not always exactly reproducible. For qualitative or half quantitative determinations they are well suited. Exact quantitative measurements should be carried out using direct assay techniques. The primary difficulty in evaluating SOD activity consists in the free radical nature of the substrate O ". Apart from some exceptions, it can only be supplied by generation within the test medium. Another problem is the detection of the ongoing reaction by either physical methods or indicators. 

It seems to us that the complicated interrelations between structure and function in enzyme catalysis cannot be fully understood without a model that takes all the relevant interactions into account. If one can devise sufficiently accurate schemes for simulating enzymatic reactions and reproducing the observed rate constants, it would be possible to examine the different contributions to the calculated activation energy and evaluate their relative importance. This would also make it possible to explore the detailed mechanisms of enzyme catalysis in a way that is not accessible to direct experimental methods (e.g. with a reliable computational simulation scheme, the relative importance of such factors as strain and electrostatics can be readily evaluated). However, it is, important to realise that in order for a theoretical framework to be really useful in this context, it should be able to give semi-quantitative or quantitative information, rather than just providing an exercise in computational quantum chemistry at the qualitative level. 

In this book, we interpret several phenomena involving polyelectrolytes measured with different experimental techniques. In this chapter we present a computational method that attempts to achieve several purposes. The most direct goal is to reproduce qualitatively or quantitatively the experimental result of interest using a simple model to represent the structures of the polyelectrolyte and the others species present in the system. The second objective is the interpretation and explanation of the phenomenon at a molecular level to gain insight into inter-molecular forces relevant to the process or behavior under study. A third objective is to denote the capacity of the model and the simulation method for the predictions of experimental result. The last purpose of the simulations is to evaluate the power of theories. 

---