Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Removal vs. temperature for

The curve in Figure 21 represents SO2 equiUbrium conversions vs temperature for the initial SO2 and O2 gas concentrations. Each initial SO2 gas concentration has its own characteristic equiUbrium curve. For a given gas composition, the adiabatic temperature rise lines can approach the equiUbrium curve but never cross it. The equiUbrium curve limits conversion in a single absorption plant to slightly over 98% using a conventional catalyst. The double absorption process removes this limitation by removing the SO from the gas stream, thereby altering the equiUbrium curve. [Pg.186]

Figure 5-1 Numerical and graphical example for a nonisothermal CSTR with exothermic chemical reaction, illustrating the phenomenon of three steady-state op ting points as dictated by three intersections of the rates of thermal energy gen tion and removal vs. temperature curves. Figure 5-1 Numerical and graphical example for a nonisothermal CSTR with exothermic chemical reaction, illustrating the phenomenon of three steady-state op ting points as dictated by three intersections of the rates of thermal energy gen tion and removal vs. temperature curves.
A plot of boiling temperatures (°F) vs. cumulative percent volume removed from the sample is referred to as a distillation curve. The boiling temperatures for various products range from high to low divided into the following product types residue, heavy gas-oil, light gas-oil, kerosene, naphtha, gasoline, and butanes (Table 4.4). [Pg.100]

It also demonstrates that in both cases a similar reflectance vs temperature curve exists. In the region of the liquid crystal dispersion, i.e. between 20°C and 40°C, the oil removal increases significantly. Above the phase transition W + La — W + L3, between 40°C and 70°C, no further increase in oil removal takes place. For olive oil, a small decrease in detergent performance is observed. The interfacial tensions between aqueous solutions of C12E3 and mineral oil lie at about 5 mN m 1 at 30°C and 50°C and these relatively high values indicate that, in this system, the interfacial activity is not the decisive factor in oil removal from fabrics. [Pg.66]

The heteroatom elimination from total feed is plotted vs. temperature in Figure 11. The data show an increase in sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen removal as the temperature increases. The scatter in the oxygen data is considerably greater than for either nitrogen or sulfur. [Pg.143]

A sequence of wafers was polished for a duration adequate to ensure the attainment of thermal stability. The final or equilibrium temperature could then be plotted against the equilibrium removal rate. In the spirit of treating CMP like a chemical reaction, we can plot log of equilibrium removal rate vs. inverse absolute equilibrium (instantaneous) temperature. We have done so for the standard, two-component slurry, the abrasive alone and the oxidizer alone, in Fig. 2, below. Note that each of the three sequences results in a straight line when plotted in this manner, and that moreover, the slopes of the three lines are very similar. The implication of the straight line fits (except near room temperature for the standard slurry) and the similar slopes is that the polish rate obeys an Arrhenius relationship, and that the activation energy is similar for the slurry and each of its components, differing only in the fi"equency factor constant. Further, that while the rate for a given slurry proceeds like a chemical reaction, efficacious removal is achieved only with a combination of oxidizer and abrasive. [Pg.157]

For several polymers, replotting of CO2 solubilities against activity, rather than pressure, nearly removes the temperature ctepei ence of the isotherms above their inflection. This result indicates a near-zero heat of mixing variation of CO2 activity with temperature apparently accounts for most of the temperature dependence of the isotherms plotted vs pressure.. [Pg.222]

Fig. 3 Heat generated and removed at the inlet of a monolith combustor vs. temperature, calculated from Eqs. (3) and (4) for the conditions presented in Table 1. The straight lines represent the heat transfer curves in the absence of radiation losses. When the inlet gas temperature is 280 C, Eq. (5) is satisfied for three values of 297 C, 371 C, and 1326 C. As the temperature of the inlet gas is increased, the two lower intersection points approach each other and eventually both points merge at = 335 C when the inlet gas temperature is 292°C. This is referred to as the catalytic ignition or light-off temperature. A further increase in the inlet gas temperature results in a situation where there is only one intersection point. (View this art in color at www.dekker.com.)... Fig. 3 Heat generated and removed at the inlet of a monolith combustor vs. temperature, calculated from Eqs. (3) and (4) for the conditions presented in Table 1. The straight lines represent the heat transfer curves in the absence of radiation losses. When the inlet gas temperature is 280 C, Eq. (5) is satisfied for three values of 297 C, 371 C, and 1326 C. As the temperature of the inlet gas is increased, the two lower intersection points approach each other and eventually both points merge at = 335 C when the inlet gas temperature is 292°C. This is referred to as the catalytic ignition or light-off temperature. A further increase in the inlet gas temperature results in a situation where there is only one intersection point. (View this art in color at www.dekker.com.)...
The high carbon reaction rate on alumina makes this material the substrate of choice for the proposed petroleum upgrading scheme (12). For example, if a reaction rate constant of 0.011 min-1 is required (corresponding to about 210 min residence time for 90% coke removal), a temperature advantage of 65°F (1495 vs. 1560°F) would exist for alumina over silica-alumina. [Pg.292]

One irreversible chemical reaction occurs in a constant-volume batch reactor. The reaction is exothermic and a digital controller removes thermal energy at an appropriate rate to maintain constant temperature throughout the course of the reaction. Sketch the time dependence of the rate of thermal energy removal, d 2/t< f)removai vs. time, for isothermal operation when the rate law is described by ... [Pg.136]

Figure F.9.3. Temperature vs. time for a superparamagnetic 11% Fe +silica gel nanocomposite as a 5T magnetic field was first removed and then applied to the sample. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. 342.)... Figure F.9.3. Temperature vs. time for a superparamagnetic 11% Fe +silica gel nanocomposite as a 5T magnetic field was first removed and then applied to the sample. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. 342.)...

See other pages where Removal vs. temperature for is mentioned: [Pg.143]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.389]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.140 ]




SEARCH



Vs. temperature

© 2024 chempedia.info