Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Average relaxation time

Mechanism Relation between relaxation time and molecular weight Relaxation time" Average diffusion distance" at r... [Pg.343]

The first is the weak viscoelasticity approach employed in the theory. For common polymers with long flexible chains, the weak viscoelasticity simply means the smallness of the Deborah number, De = Qy < 1 where 0 is the relaxation time averaged over the relaxation spectrum. In case of anisotropic LCPs where at least two relaxation times exist, the definition of Deborah number is not clear. [Pg.523]

Nuclear spin relaxation is caused by fluctuating interactions involving nuclear spins. We write the corresponding Hamiltonians (which act as perturbations to the static or time-averaged Hamiltonian, detemiming the energy level structure) in tenns of a scalar contraction of spherical tensors ... [Pg.1503]

If die average time between collisions is 2t dieii die relaxation time is dehned by... [Pg.149]

Figure 9 Treating internal dynamics during the refinement process. Due to dynamics and the weighting of the NOE, the measured distance may appear much shorter than the average distance. This can be accounted for by using ensemble refinement techniques. In contrast to standard refinement, an average distance is calculated over an ensemble of C structures (ensemble refinement) or a trajectory (time-averaged refinement). The time-averaged distance is defined with an exponential window over the trajectory. T is the total length over the trajectory, t is the time, and x is a relaxation time characterizing the width of the exponential window. Figure 9 Treating internal dynamics during the refinement process. Due to dynamics and the weighting of the NOE, the measured distance may appear much shorter than the average distance. This can be accounted for by using ensemble refinement techniques. In contrast to standard refinement, an average distance is calculated over an ensemble of C structures (ensemble refinement) or a trajectory (time-averaged refinement). The time-averaged distance is defined with an exponential window over the trajectory. T is the total length over the trajectory, t is the time, and x is a relaxation time characterizing the width of the exponential window.
The average polymer melt relaxation times between the processing temperature Tp and the solidifying temperature (the Tg in amorphous polymers and somewhere between Tg and with polycrystalline polymers). [Pg.176]

Example consider polystyrene with M = 245,000 and welded to itself at 118°C, the characteristic relaxation times are te 10 s, tro 21 min and Ty 1860 min [15], At these relaxation times, the respective average monomer interdiffusion distance is as follows [1 j ... [Pg.361]

The relaxation time r of the mean length, = 2A Loo, gives a measure of the microscopic breaking rate k. In Fig. 16 the relaxation of the average length (L) with time after a quench from initial temperature Lq = 1.0 to a series of lower temperatures (those shown on the plot are = 0.35,0.37, and 0.40) is compared to the analytical result, Eq. (24). Despite some statistical fluctuations at late times after the quench it is evident from Fig. 16 that predictions (Eq. (24)) and measurements practically coincide. In the inset is also shown the reverse L-jump from Tq = 0.35 to = 1.00. Clearly, the relaxation in this case is much ( 20 times) faster and is also well reproduced by the non-exponential law, Eq. (24). In the absence of laboratory investigations so far, this appears the only unambiguous confirmation for the nonlinear relaxation of GM after a T-quench. [Pg.538]

It turns out that a rather simple description of this nonlinear relaxation in terms of a single relaxation time,, depending on the final average chain length Loo, is suggested by a scaling plot of L t) for different L o, as shown in Fig. 18 for an initial exponential MWD. It is evident from Fig. 18 that the response curves, L o — L t), for different L o may be collapsed onto a single master curve, 1 - L t)lLoo = /(V Loo) measured in units of a... [Pg.543]

Proteins, 109,110, 116.Seealso Enzymes Macromolecules average thermal amplitudes, MD simulations, 119 binding of ligands to, 120 dielectric relaxation time of, 122 electrostatic energies in, 122, 123-125 flexibility of, 209,221,226-227, 227 folding, 109,227... [Pg.234]

It is an unfortunate fact that several preexisting theories have tried to explain complicated mechanical phenomena of CB-reinforced rubbery materials but they have not been so successful." " However, a recent report might have a capability of explaining them collectively," when the author accepted the existence of the component whose molecular mobility is different from that of matrix mbber component in addition to the existence of well-known bound rubber component. The report described that this new component might be the most important factor to determine the reinforcement. These mbber components have been verified by spin-spin relaxation time 2 by pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique, ° while the information obtained by NMR is qualitative and averaged over the sample and, therefore, lacking in the spatial... [Pg.597]

Reorientational relaxation times, tJ can be estimated from the assumed exponential decay of the orientational correlation functions cf(/), defined as the average of the / I.egendre polynomial of cos 0, ... [Pg.245]

The relaxation rates of the individual nuclei can be either measured or estimated by comparison with other related molecules. If a molecule has a very slow-relaxing proton, then it may be convenient not to adjust the delay time with reference to that proton and to tolerate the resulting inaccuracy in its intensity but adjust it according to the average relaxation rates of the other protons. In 2D spectra, where 90 pulses are often used, the delay between pulses is typically adjusted to 3T] or 4Ti (where T] is the spin-lattice relaxation time) to ensure no residual transverse magnetization from the previous pulse that could yield artifact signals. In ID proton NMR spectra, on the other hand, the tip angle 0 is usually kept at 30°-40°. [Pg.54]

On the other hand, NMR spectra appear in general as the average of the spectra of the two spin states [36, 153]. This observation determines an upper limit for the spin-state lifetime shorter than the nuclear spin relaxation time Tl = l/ktH < lO s. In general, therefore, either the superposition or the average of the particular spectroscopic properties of the two spin states is observed, subject to the relative magnitude of lifetime of the excited spectroscopic state and the rate of spin-state conversion. The rate /clh is thus estimated... [Pg.107]


See other pages where Average relaxation time is mentioned: [Pg.302]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.1526]    [Pg.1609]    [Pg.2144]    [Pg.2831]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.220]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 ]




SEARCH



Averaging time

Time average

Weight-average relaxation time

© 2024 chempedia.info