Low-noise case

There is, however, something unexpected about Figure 44-1 la-1. That is the decrease in absorbance noise at the very lowest values of S/N, i.e., those lower than approximately Er = 1. This decrease is not a glitch or an artifact or a result of the random effects of divergence of the integral of the data such as we saw when performing a similar computation on the simulated transmission values. The effect is consistent and reproducible. In fact, it appears to be somewhat similar in character to the decrease in computed transmittance we observed at very low values of S/N for the low-noise case, e.g., that shown in Figure 43-6. 

Here again, in the low-noise case of scintillation noise, the absorbance noise is again independent of the reference signal level, and is now independent of the sample characteristics, as well, and depends only on the magnitude of the external noise source. 

In conformance with our regular pattern, we now derive the behavior of the relative absorbance noise for the low-noise case. Here we start with equation 52-100, the derivation of which is found in [9] ... 

In the low-noise case we were able to justify separating equation 53-5 into two terms and setting T equal to EJ(EX + AEr). Here we cannot do that for several reasons ... 

To derive the transmittance noise for the case of large scintillation noise, we begin at a somewhat earlier point than we did for the low-noise case, with equation 41-14 [2] ... 

A closed-form result involving only matrix solution and substitution operations was obtained. Under certain circumstances, particularly in the low-noise case, application of the Burg method results in spurious resolution or spontaneous line splitting (Fougere et al., 1976). One solution to this problem (Fougere, 1977) introduces iteration. 

We want to mention that the probability density further off the maxima becomes extremely small for small noise intensities so that numerical errors will eventually dominate the obtained results. In particular we cannot exclude a second maximum for the low noise case in Fig. 1.5. However we have also performed simulations with varying e (separation of the timescales). For high e (small separation) we find states with clearly one maximum only. 

It can be observed from the Figure 1 that the sensitivity of I.I. system is quite low at lower thicknesses and improves as the thicknesses increase. Further the sensitivity is low in case of as observed images compared to processed images. This can be attributed to the quantum fluctuations in the number of photons received and also to the electronic and screen noise. Integration of the images reduces this noise by a factor of N where N is the number of frames. Another observation of interest from the experiment was that if the orientation of the wires was horizontal there was a decrease in the observed sensitivity. It can be observed from the contrast response curves that the response for defect detection is better in magnified modes compared to normal mode of the II tube. Further, it can be observed that the vertical resolution is better compared to horizontal which is in line with prediction by the sensitivity curves. 

The electrolyte volume of the STM cells is usually very small (ofthe order of a 100 pi in the above-described case) and evaporation of the solution can create problems in long-term experiments. Miniature reference electrodes, mostly saturated calomel electrodes (SCE), have been described in the literature [25], although they are hardly used anymore in our laboratory for practical reasons Cleaning the glassware in caroic acid becomes cumbersome. For most studies, a simple Pt wire, immersed directly into solution, is a convenient, low-noise quasireference electrode. The Pt wire is readily cleaned by holding it into a Bunsen flame, and it provides a fairly constant reference potential of fcj>i — + 0.55 0.05 V versus SCE for 0.1 M sulfuric or perchloric acid solutions (+ 0.67 0.05 V for 0.1 M nitric acid), which has to be checked from time to time and for different solutions. 

To summarize the effects at low signal-to-noise to compare with the high signal-to-noise case summarized above, here the noise of the transmittance increases directly with T and still inversely with the reference energy. 

Because of the backaction, the low-noise condition is implemented in the quantum case by a double-sided inequality ... 

At evaporating temperatures between -30 and -45 °C, the screw compressor is more economical. At temperatures of -55 °C and lower, the piston and screw compressors are equally efficient. The reason for this lies in the lower power input of the piston compressor at low evaporating temperatures. Another advantage of the screw compressor is the low noise level. The disadvantage might be the price, but this must be evaluated in each individual case. Another alternative should be mentioned to complete the picture this alternative to screw compressors would be the use of cooling cascades. 

---