Reactors, chemical stirred tanks

Hannon, J., Mixing and Chemical Reaction in Tubular Reactors and Stirred Tanks, PhD. Thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, U.K., 1992. 

A useful classification of types of chemical reactors is in terms of their concentration patterns. Certain limiting or ideal types are represented by Figure 4.1 which illustrates batch reactors, continuous stirred tanks and tubular flow reactors. This chapter is concerned with the sizes, performances and heat effects of these ideal types. They afford standards of comparison and are often as close enough to the truth as available information allows. 

Based on these observations [93] proposed a modified model containing two time constants, one for the liquid shear induced turbulence and a second one for the bubble induced turbulence. The basic assumption made in this model development is that the shear-induced turbulent kinetic energy and the bubble-induced turbulent kinetic energy may be linearly superposed in accordance with the hypothesis of [128, 129]. Note, however, that [82] observed experimentally that this assumption is only valid for void fractions less than 1 %, whereas for higher values there is an amplification in the turbulence attributed to the interactions between the bubbles. The application of this model to the high void fraction flows occurring in operating multiphase chemical reactors like stirred tanks and bubble columns is thus questionable. 

Figure 15.5 Two-reactor model of imperfect mixing in a CSTR. (a) Idealized CSTR in which mixing is perfect and concentrations are homogeneous throughout the reactor, (b) Stirred tank with cross flow between active (well-mixed) and dead (poorly mixed) zones. Q represents volume flow, C is concentration, k is flow rate (reciprocal residence time), and V is volume. Subscripts i specifies chemical species, 0 signifies input from reservoirs, r is homogeneous reactor, and a and d are active and dead zones, respectively. (Adapted from Kumpinsky and Epstein, 1985.)...

Nowadays it is sometimes argued that each chemical reactor is unique and a systematic classification of chemical unit operations makes little sense. However, a classification based on the nature of the way different phases/substances are brought into contact with one another tends to dominate hence there are packed, fluidised, and spouted bed reactors, bubble column reactors, batch stirred tank reactors, etcetera. 

CFD software helps you to quantify residence times, mixing rates, scaling effects, and overall chemical conversion in a wide range of reactor S5 tems, including packed beds, fluidized beds, recirculating beds, plug flow or tube reactors, and stirred tank reactors. This provides the flexibility you need for description of reactions and the sophistication you need for prediction of gas-sobd, gas-bquid, or liquid-solid mtdtiphase systems. 

Most chemical processes involve two important operations (reaction and separalion) that are typically carried out in different sections of the plant and use different equipment. The reaction section of the process can use several types of reactors [continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR), tubular, or batch] and operate under a wide variety of conditions (catalyzed, adiabatic, cooled or heated, single phase, multiple phases, etc.). The separation section can have several types of operations (distillation, extraction, crystallization, adsorption, etc.), with distillation being by far the most commonly used method. Recycle streams between the two sections of these conventional multiunit flowsheets are often incorporated in the process for a variety of reasons to improve conversion and yield, to minimize the production of undesirable byproducts, to improve energy efficiency, and to improve dynamic controllability. 

Classification of the many different encapsulation processes is usehil. Previous schemes employing the categories chemical or physical are unsatisfactory because many so-called chemical processes involve exclusively physical phenomena, whereas so-called physical processes can utilize chemical phenomena. An alternative approach is to classify all encapsulation processes as either Type A or Type B processes. Type A processes are defined as those in which capsule formation occurs entirely in a Hquid-filled stirred tank or tubular reactor. Emulsion and dispersion stabiUty play a key role in determining the success of such processes. Type B processes are processes in which capsule formation occurs because a coating is sprayed or deposited in some manner onto the surface of a Hquid or soHd core material dispersed in a gas phase or vacuum. This category also includes processes in which Hquid droplets containing core material are sprayed into a gas phase and subsequentiy solidified to produce microcapsules. Emulsion and dispersion stabilization can play a key role in the success of Type B processes also. 

Conoco operated a stirred tank Pfaudler glass-lined reactor for the batch SO sulfonation of detergent alkylate. The plant utilized over-the-fence SO converter gas (8% SO ia dry air) having h batch cycles (264). AHied Chemical Company provided details for batch SO sulfonation (265,266)... 

Over 25 years ago the coking factor of the radiant coil was empirically correlated to operating conditions (48). It has been assumed that the mass transfer of coke precursors from the bulk of the gas to the walls was controlling the rate of deposition (39). Kinetic models (24,49,50) were developed based on the chemical reaction at the wall as a controlling step. Bench-scale data (51—53) appear to indicate that a chemical reaction controls. However, flow regimes of bench-scale reactors are so different from the commercial furnaces that scale-up of bench-scale results caimot be confidently appHed to commercial furnaces. For example. Figure 3 shows the coke deposited on a controlled cylindrical specimen in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and the rate of coke deposition. The deposition rate decreases with time and attains a pseudo steady value. Though this is achieved in a matter of rninutes in bench-scale reactors, it takes a few days in a commercial furnace. 

Flow Reactors Fast reactions and those in the gas phase are generally done in tubular flow reaclors, just as they are often done on the commercial scale. Some heterogeneous reactors are shown in Fig. 23-29 the item in Fig. 23-29g is suited to liquid/liquid as well as gas/liquid. Stirred tanks, bubble and packed towers, and other commercial types are also used. The operadon of such units can sometimes be predicted from independent data of chemical and mass transfer rates, correlations of interfacial areas, droplet sizes, and other data. 

FIG. 23-1 Heat transfer to stirred tank reactors, a) Jacket, (h) Internal coils, (c) Internal tubes, (d) External heat exchanger, (e) External reflux condenser. if) Fired heater. (Walas, Reaction Kinetics for Chemical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, 1959). 

Two complementai y reviews of this subject are by Shah et al. AIChE Journal, 28, 353-379 [1982]) and Deckwer (in de Lasa, ed.. Chemical Reactor Design andTechnology, Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, pp. 411-461). Useful comments are made by Doraiswamy and Sharma (Heterogeneous Reactions, Wiley, 1984). Charpentier (in Gianetto and Silveston, eds.. Multiphase Chemical Reactors, Hemisphere, 1986, pp. 104—151) emphasizes parameters of trickle bed and stirred tank reactors. Recommendations based on the literature are made for several design parameters namely, bubble diameter and velocity of rise, gas holdup, interfacial area, mass-transfer coefficients k a and /cl but not /cg, axial liquid-phase dispersion coefficient, and heat-transfer coefficient to the wall. The effect of vessel diameter on these parameters is insignificant when D > 0.15 m (0.49 ft), except for the dispersion coefficient. Application of these correlations is to (1) chlorination of toluene in the presence of FeCl,3 catalyst, (2) absorption of SO9 in aqueous potassium carbonate with arsenite catalyst, and (3) reaction of butene with sulfuric acid to butanol. 

---