Chemical stirred tank

Classification of the many different encapsulation processes is usehil. Previous schemes employing the categories chemical or physical are unsatisfactory because many so-called chemical processes involve exclusively physical phenomena, whereas so-called physical processes can utilize chemical phenomena. An alternative approach is to classify all encapsulation processes as either Type A or Type B processes. Type A processes are defined as those in which capsule formation occurs entirely in a Hquid-filled stirred tank or tubular reactor. Emulsion and dispersion stabiUty play a key role in determining the success of such processes. Type B processes are processes in which capsule formation occurs because a coating is sprayed or deposited in some manner onto the surface of a Hquid or soHd core material dispersed in a gas phase or vacuum. This category also includes processes in which Hquid droplets containing core material are sprayed into a gas phase and subsequentiy solidified to produce microcapsules. Emulsion and dispersion stabilization can play a key role in the success of Type B processes also. 

Batch Stirred Tank SO Sulfonation Processes. If the color of the derived sulfonate is not critical, such as ia the productioa of oil-soluble ag-emulsifiers, a simple batch sulfoaatioa procedure can be employed based on vaporizing liquid SO (Niaol Labs, 1952) (13,263). Pilot Chemical Company adapted the original Morrisroe 60—70% oleum—SO2 solvent sulfonation process (256) to utilize 92% Hquid SO —8% Hquid SO2 mixtures, and more recently usiag 100% Hquid SO. This cold sulfoaatioa low viscosity sulfoaatioa process produces exceUeat quaHty products, and reportedly has also been adapted for continuous processiag as weU. The derived sulfonic acid must be stripped of SO2 solvent after completing sulfonation and digestion. 

Conoco operated a stirred tank Pfaudler glass-lined reactor for the batch SO sulfonation of detergent alkylate. The plant utilized over-the-fence SO converter gas (8% SO ia dry air) having h batch cycles (264). AHied Chemical Company provided details for batch SO sulfonation (265,266)... 

Over 25 years ago the coking factor of the radiant coil was empirically correlated to operating conditions (48). It has been assumed that the mass transfer of coke precursors from the bulk of the gas to the walls was controlling the rate of deposition (39). Kinetic models (24,49,50) were developed based on the chemical reaction at the wall as a controlling step. Bench-scale data (51—53) appear to indicate that a chemical reaction controls. However, flow regimes of bench-scale reactors are so different from the commercial furnaces that scale-up of bench-scale results caimot be confidently appHed to commercial furnaces. For example. Figure 3 shows the coke deposited on a controlled cylindrical specimen in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and the rate of coke deposition. The deposition rate decreases with time and attains a pseudo steady value. Though this is achieved in a matter of rninutes in bench-scale reactors, it takes a few days in a commercial furnace. 

Flow Reactors Fast reactions and those in the gas phase are generally done in tubular flow reaclors, just as they are often done on the commercial scale. Some heterogeneous reactors are shown in Fig. 23-29 the item in Fig. 23-29g is suited to liquid/liquid as well as gas/liquid. Stirred tanks, bubble and packed towers, and other commercial types are also used. The operadon of such units can sometimes be predicted from independent data of chemical and mass transfer rates, correlations of interfacial areas, droplet sizes, and other data. 

FIG. 23-1 Heat transfer to stirred tank reactors, a) Jacket, (h) Internal coils, (c) Internal tubes, (d) External heat exchanger, (e) External reflux condenser. if) Fired heater. (Walas, Reaction Kinetics for Chemical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, 1959). 

Two complementai y reviews of this subject are by Shah et al. AIChE Journal, 28, 353-379 [1982]) and Deckwer (in de Lasa, ed.. Chemical Reactor Design andTechnology, Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, pp. 411-461). Useful comments are made by Doraiswamy and Sharma (Heterogeneous Reactions, Wiley, 1984). Charpentier (in Gianetto and Silveston, eds.. Multiphase Chemical Reactors, Hemisphere, 1986, pp. 104—151) emphasizes parameters of trickle bed and stirred tank reactors. Recommendations based on the literature are made for several design parameters namely, bubble diameter and velocity of rise, gas holdup, interfacial area, mass-transfer coefficients k a and /cl but not /cg, axial liquid-phase dispersion coefficient, and heat-transfer coefficient to the wall. The effect of vessel diameter on these parameters is insignificant when D > 0.15 m (0.49 ft), except for the dispersion coefficient. Application of these correlations is to (1) chlorination of toluene in the presence of FeCl,3 catalyst, (2) absorption of SO9 in aqueous potassium carbonate with arsenite catalyst, and (3) reaction of butene with sulfuric acid to butanol. 

TIME-DEPENDENT TURBULENT MIXING AND CHEMICAL REACTION IN STIRRED TANKS ... 

Hannon, J., Mixing and Chemical Reaction in Tubular Reactors and Stirred Tanks, PhD. Thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, U.K., 1992. 

Baldyga, J. and Bourne, J.R., 1992. Interactions between mixing on various scales in stirred tank reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 47, 1839-1848. 

Bourne, J.R. and Dell Ava, P., 1987. Micro- and macromixing in stirred tank reactors of different sizes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 65, 180-186. 

Geisler, R., Mersmann, A. and Voit, H., 1991. Macro- and micromixing in stirred tanks. International Chemical Engineering, 31, 642-653. 

Tosun, G., 1992. A mathematical model of mixing and polymerization in a semibatch stirred tank reactor. American Institution of Chemical Engineers Journal, 38, 425 37. 

Xu, Y. and McGrath, G., 1996. CFD predictions of stirred tank flows. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, 74, 471M75. 

If the mixing is "perfect," tlie estuary behavior may be approximated by what chemical engineers define as a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) (5). However, accurately estimating the time and spatial beliavior of water quality in estuaries is complicated by the effects of tidal motion as just described. The upstream and downstream currents produce substantial variations of water quality at certain points in the estuary, and tlie calculation of such variation is indeed a complicated problem. How ei er, the following simplifications provide some reiiitirkably useful results in estimating the distribution of estuarine water quality. 

The advantages of continuous tubular reactors are well known. They include the elimination of batch to batch variations, a large heat transfer area and minimal handling of chemical products. Despite these advantages there are no reported commercial instances of emulsion polymerizations done in a tubular reactor instead the continuous emulsion process has been realized in series-connected stirred tank reactors (1, . ... 

This set of first-order ODEs is easier to solve than the algebraic equations where all the time derivatives are zero. The initial conditions are that a ut = no, bout = bo,... at t = 0. The long-time solution to these ODEs will satisfy Equations (4.1) provided that a steady-state solution exists and is accessible from the assumed initial conditions. There may be no steady state. Recall the chemical oscillators of Chapter 2. Stirred tank reactors can also exhibit oscillations or more complex behavior known as chaos. It is also possible that the reactor has multiple steady states, some of which are unstable. Multiple steady states are fairly common in stirred tank reactors when the reaction exotherm is large. The method of false transients will go to a steady state that is stable but may not be desirable. Stirred tank reactors sometimes have one steady state where there is no reaction and another steady state where the reaction runs away. Think of the reaction A B —> C. The stable steady states may give all A or all C, and a control system is needed to stabilize operation at a middle steady state that gives reasonable amounts of B. This situation arises mainly in nonisothermal systems and is discussed in Chapter 5. 

Copolymerizations. The uniform chemical environment of a CSTR makes it ideally suited for the production of copolymers. If the assumption of perfect mixing is justified, there will be no macroscopic composition distribution due to monomer drift, but the mixing time must remain short upon scaleup. See Sections 1.5 and 4.4. A real stirred tank or loop reactor will more closely... 

Therefore, many traditional designs, such as stirred tank reactors, incorporate heat transfer in the process (jacket, external or internal coil, etc.). However, in these devices, there is a significant distance between the heat transfer site and the site of the chemical reaction where heat is released. As a consequence semibatch mode is implemented while batch mode and/or systems are diluted. 

Almost all flows in chemical reactors are turbulent and traditionally turbulence is seen as random fluctuations in velocity. A better view is to recognize the structure of turbulence. The large turbulent eddies are about the size of the width of the impeller blades in a stirred tank reactor and about 1/10 of the pipe diameter in pipe flows. These large turbulent eddies have a lifetime of some tens of milliseconds. Use of averaged turbulent properties is only valid for linear processes while all nonlinear phenomena are sensitive to the details in the process. Mixing coupled with fast chemical reactions, coalescence and breakup of bubbles and drops, and nucleation in crystallization is a phenomenon that is affected by the turbulent structure. Either a resolution of the turbulent fluctuations or some measure of the distribution of the turbulent properties is required in order to obtain accurate predictions. 

Special reactors are required to conduct biochemical reactions for the transformation and production of chemical and biological substances involving the use of biocatalysts (enzymes, immobilised enzymes, microorganisms, plant and animal cells). These bioreactors have to be designed so that the enzymes or living organisms can be used under defined, optimal conditions. The bioreactors which are mainly used on laboratory scale and industrially are roller bottles, shake flasks, stirred tanks and bubble columns (see Table 1). 

---