Reactor monitoring

An overview-type paper by Crowley et al.49 addresses some differences between microbial and mammalian cultivations. The paper suggests different analytical approaches based on the length of reactions and concentration and number of products and/or reactants in the vessel. Diagrams for reactor-monitoring systems are shown, and methods for making control loops are discussed. 

Explanation may be related to the heterogeneity of the reaction medium polymerization location is mostly limited to within the polymer particles, so the copolymer composition is dependent on the composition of the monomer mixture inside the particles, which may be different from that of the whole reactor, monitored by the apparatus. So, compositions of various phases, monomer droplets, polymer particles, aqueous phase, were measured using gas chromatographic (GC) analysis, after they were separated by ultracentrifugation (33,000 rpm). 

An issue that is being addressed in the context of global xenon monitoring for nuclear explosions, when the source is not a priori known as in the case of local reactor monitoring or subsurface monitoring, is the attribution of an unknown source of radioxenon - namely, what is the source of the measurement By isotopic analysis of the xenon isotopes in combination authors have suggested that xenon emitted from nuclear explosions can be separated from reactor output since the time it takes to vent species from a nuclear explosion and from a nuclear reactor differ somewhat. " ... 

The instrumentation and control system consists of the reactor protection system, engineered safety features opmtion system, plant control system and reactor monitoring system. The reactor protection syston has two diverse shutdown ems. The engineered safety features are the decay heat removal system (PRACS) and the containment system. 

NUclear Instrumentation measures the levels the distribution and the rate of change of neutron flux density in the reactor. Monitoring data and safety circuit trip signals are provided as appropriate over the full range of neutron flux levels from those existing during sub-critical shutdown conditions to those characteristic of full production level operation. 

Color Illustration 2-2. N Reactor Monitoring Well Locations... 

Significant operational parameters for the recognition of a potentially increased discharge of radioactive substances at an early stage or parameters which supply information about the current operational condition of a plant also are transmitted via the remote nuclear reactor monitoring system. 

Equipment is required to be provided to monitor and record all discharges of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to the environment [1]. In addition, equipment should be provided to monitor systems that may contribute large fractions of the overall releases of the plant. In water cooled reactors, monitoring of the following systems should be provided where applicable ... 

Items required for shutting down the reactor, monitoring critical parameters, maintaining the reactor in a shutdown condition and removing residual heat over a required period ... 

By approximately 11 00 pm Friday evening, the local electricity demand had subsided, and the load dispatcher gave permission for Chernobyl Unit 4 to continue with its power reduction. At this point, another step in a string of unfortunate events occurred when the automatic reactor control unit did not adjust for the new lower power level. The operators had reset the reactor monitoring system to the requested level, but had failed to reset the reactor automatic controller. The reactor s response was a dramatic drop in power, down to 30 MWt, 1 % of the normal operating level (US NRC, 1987). In effect, the automatic controller inserted control rods, which drove the overall core power dramatically lower than was intended. 

In DHRUVA and PARR-1 the data acquisition system developed for reactor status monitoring is also used for evaluating reactor characteristics and performance monitoring. In the case of Korean research reactors, a simple PC system, independent from the reactor monitoring system has been employed for similar purposes. 

Shutdown would cause a reduction in the turbine inlet temperature of the Brayton unit energy converters. This would reduce their power output, and require that power be supplied from the test facility to motor their alternators for decay heat removal (similar to the beginning of the reactor startup sequence). The Brayton units could be continuously motored to provide decay heat removal, or a separate circulator could be added to the prototype support facility to provide the function and allow the Brayton units to be secured. The prototype support facility would also need to provide a continuous source of power to the 28 Vdc bus for uninterrupted power to the reactor controllers to completely withdraw the sliders and allow for continuous reactor monitoring after the shutdown. 

---