Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reactor cocurrent

Solid catalyst Countercurrent Cocurrent downward Trickle bed reactor Packed bubble reactor Cocurrent upward Co- or countercurrent Bubble reactor Slurry reactor ... [Pg.692]

Tube Reactors Cocurrent BC variant with pipelines or coils senring as guidelines. Very similar to heat exchanger. horizontal, vertical or coiled variety of flow regimes... [Pg.265]

Gas-liquid mixtures are sometimes reacted in packed beds. The gas and the liquid usually flow cocurrently. Such trickle-bed reactors have the advantage that residence times of the liquid are shorter than in countercurrent operation. This can be useful in avoiding unwanted side reactions. [Pg.56]

Fixed-bed reactors in the form of gas absorption equipment are used commonly for noncatalytic gas-liquid reactions. Here the packed bed serves only to give good contact between the gas and liquid. Both cocurrent and countercurrent operations are used. Countercurrent operation gives the highest reaction rates. Cocurrent operation is preferred if a short liquid residence time is required. [Pg.58]

After the SO converter has stabilized, the 6—7% SO gas stream can be further diluted with dry air, I, to provide the SO reaction gas at a prescribed concentration, ca 4 vol % for LAB sulfonation and ca 2.5% for alcohol ethoxylate sulfation. The molten sulfur is accurately measured and controlled by mass flow meters. The organic feedstock is also accurately controlled by mass flow meters and a variable speed-driven gear pump. The high velocity SO reaction gas and organic feedstock are introduced into the top of the sulfonation reactor,, in cocurrent downward flow where the reaction product and gas are separated in a cyclone separator, K, then pumped to a cooler, L, and circulated back into a quench cooling reservoir at the base of the reactor, unique to Chemithon concentric reactor systems. The gas stream from the cyclone separator, M, is sent to an electrostatic precipitator (ESP), N, which removes entrained acidic organics, and then sent to the packed tower, H, where SO2 and any SO traces are adsorbed in a dilute NaOH solution and finally vented, O. Even a 99% conversion of SO2 to SO contributes ca 500 ppm SO2 to the effluent gas. [Pg.89]

In the first class, the particles form a fixed bed, and the fluid phases may be in either cocurrent or countercurrent flow. Two different flow patterns are of interest, trickle flow and bubble flow. In trickle-flow reactors, the liquid flows as a film over the particle surface, and the gas forms a continuous phase. In bubble-flow reactors, the liquid holdup is higher, and the gas forms a discontinuous, bubbling phase. [Pg.72]

In the second class, the particles are suspended in the liquid phase. Momentum may be transferred to the particles in different ways, and it is possible to distinguish between bubble-column slurry reactors (in which particles are suspended by bubble movement), stirred-slurry reactors (in which particles are suspended by bubble movement and mechanical stirring), and gas-liquid fluidized reactors (in which particles are suspended by bubble movement and cocurrent liquid flow). [Pg.72]

Ross (R2) measured liquid-phase holdup and residence-time distribution by a tracer-pulse technique. Experiments were carried out for cocurrent flow in model columns of 2- and 4-in. diameter with air and water as fluid media, as well as in pilot-scale and industrial-scale reactors of 2-in. and 6.5-ft diameters used for the catalytic hydrogenation of petroleum fractions. The columns were packed with commercial cylindrical catalyst pellets of -in. diameter and length. The liquid holdup was from 40 to 50% of total bed volume for nominal liquid velocities from 8 to 200 ft/hr in the model reactors, from 26 to 32% of volume for nominal liquid velocities from 6 to 10.5 ft/hr in the pilot unit, and from 20 to 27 % for nominal liquid velocities from 27.9 to 68.6 ft/hr in the industrial unit. In that work, a few sets of results of residence-time distribution experiments are reported in graphical form, as tracer-response curves. [Pg.99]

The expression gas-liquid fluidization, as defined in Section III,B,3, is used for operations in which momentum is transferred to suspended solid particles by cocurrent gas and liquid flow. It may be noted that the expression gas-liquid-solid fluidization has been used for bubble-column slurry reactors (K3) with zero net liquid flow (of the type described in Sections III,B,1 and 1II,V,C). The expression gas-liquid fluidization has also been used for dispersed gas-liquid systems with no solid particles present. [Pg.123]

An investigation into the applicability of numerical residence time distribution was carried out on a pilot-scale annular bubble column reactor. Validation of the results was determined experimentally with a good degree of correlation. The liquid phase showed to be heavily dependent on the liquid flow, as expected, but also with the direction of travel. Significantly larger man residence times were observed in the cocurrent flow mode, with the counter-current mode exhibiting more chaimeling within the system, which appears to be contributed to by the gas phase. [Pg.672]

Column reactors are the second most popular reactors in the fine chemistry sector. They are mainly dedicated reactors adjusted for a particular process although in many cases column reactors can easily be adapted for another process. Cocurrently operated bubble (possibly packed) columns with upflow of both phases and trickle-bed reactors with downflow are widely used. The diameter of column reactors varies from tens of centimetres to metres, while their height ranges from two metres up to twenty metres. Larger column reactors also have been designed and operated in bulk chemicals plants. The typical catalyst particle size ranges from 1.5 mm (in trickle-bed reactors) to 10 mm (in countercurrent columns) depending on the particular application. The temperature and pressure are limited only by the material of construction and corrosivity of the reaction mixture. [Pg.267]

Laboratory reactor for studying three-phase processes can be divided in reactors with mobile and immobile catalyst particles. Bubble (suspension) column reactors, mechanically stirred tank reactors, ebullated-bed reactors and gas-lift reactors belong the class of reactors with mobile catalyst particles. Fixed-bed reactors with cocurrent (trickle-bed reactor and bubble columns, see Figs. 5.4-7 and 5.4-8 in Section 5.4.1) or countercurrent (packed column, see Fig. 5.4-8) flow of phases are reactors with immobile catalyst particles. A mobile catalyst is usually of the form of finely powdered particles, while coarser catalysts are studied when placing them in a fixed place (possibly moving as in mechanically agitated basket-type reactors). [Pg.301]

Fixed-bed reactors are used for testing commercial catalysts of larger particle sizes and to collect data for scale-up (validation of mathematical models, studying the influence of transport processes on overall reactor performance, etc.). Catalyst particles with a size ranging from 1 to 10 mm are tested using reactors of 20 to 100 mm ID. The reactor diameter can be decreased if the catalyst is diluted by fine inert particles the ratio of the reactor diameter to the size of catalyst particles then can be decreased to 3 1 (instead of the 10 to 20 recommended for fixed-bed catalytic reactors). This leads to a lower consumption of reactants. Very important for proper operation of fixed-bed reactors, both in cocurrent and countercurrent mode, is a uniform distribution of both phases over the entire cross-section of the reactor. If this is not the case, reactor performance will be significantly falsified by flow maldistribution. [Pg.301]

Figure 7.4c shows an in-line static mixer. Dispersion is usually promoted by repeatedly changing the direction of flow locally within the mixing device as the liquids are pumped through. This will give a good approximation to plug-flow in both phases in cocurrent flow. As with gas-liquid reactors, static mixers are particularly suitable when a short residence time is required. [Pg.127]

Trickle Bed Reactors (2). A trickle bed reactor utilizes a fixed bed over which liquid flows without filling the void spaces between particles. The liquid usually flows downward under the influence of gravity, while the gas flows upward or downward through the void spaces amid the catalyst pellets and the liquid holdup. Generally cocurrent downward flow of liquid and gas is preferred because it facilitates... [Pg.427]

For slow reactions, the shallow fluid beds have been organized into a cocurrent multistage fluid bed (MSFB) reactor as shown in Fig. 33 (Yan, Yao, Wang, Liu and Kwauk, 1983). In this reactor, solids are carried up by the flowing gas stream, and once they reach the top, they are collected through a funnel and recirculated to the bottom by means of a pneumatically controlled downcomer. [Pg.541]

Figure 33. The cocurrent multistage (co-MSFB) fluid-bed reactor. (Yon, Yao, Wang, Liu, and Kwauk, 1983.)... Figure 33. The cocurrent multistage (co-MSFB) fluid-bed reactor. (Yon, Yao, Wang, Liu, and Kwauk, 1983.)...
Figure 26.1 Various contacting patterns in fluid-solid reactors a-d) countercurrent, crosscurrent, and cocurrent plug flow d) intermediate gas flow, mixed solid flow (e) semibatch operations. Figure 26.1 Various contacting patterns in fluid-solid reactors a-d) countercurrent, crosscurrent, and cocurrent plug flow d) intermediate gas flow, mixed solid flow (e) semibatch operations.
Illustrated in Figure 5-21 are possible temperatures of reactor and coolant versus position z for cocurrent and countercurrent operation. [Pg.236]

Compare T (z) and T Cz) trajectories of a wall-cooled PFTR with cocurrent and countercurrent flows. Which configuration is more likely to produce more problems with a hot spot in the reactor ... [Pg.240]

In this multiphase reactor a tube or tank (a very large tube) is filled with catalyst pellets packed into a bed and a liquid flows down over the catalyst while a gas flows up or down in countercurrent or cocurrent flow. A cross section of this reactor is shown in Figure 12-14. [Pg.501]


See other pages where Reactor cocurrent is mentioned: [Pg.407]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.1362]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.1362]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.619]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.284]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.218 , Pg.219 , Pg.220 , Pg.221 ]




SEARCH



Cocurrent

Cocurrent downflow reactor

Double-pipe reactors endothermic cocurrent cooling fluid

Plug flow reactor cocurrent cooling

Reactors with two process streams in cocurrent flow

© 2024 chempedia.info