Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction rule constraints

Errors in pruning also cause significant problems. Omitted pruned paths generally resulted from our not using reaction rule constraints or nonselective and/or non-intelligent use of the rules. This is one reason why none of SYNLMA s paths represent published syntheses of Ibuprofen (15) in spite of the fact that the requisite rules were in the data base. On the positive side, the synthetic paths to Ibuprofen discovered by SYNLMA are straightforward and would probably work as shown. [Pg.112]

Our present reaction rule database is made up of approximately one hundred rules adapted from a microfiche generously sent to us by Gelernter (4). For a given reaction, a rule specifies the reactants (subgoal) and the product(s) (goal), in connection table format and any constraints on their composition (Figure 2a). The rules are identified by chapter and schema numbers. The connection tables are organized as follows ... [Pg.247]

It is clear now that we could rewrite the reaction rules to invoke subrules or layers of qualifiers as a means of effecting reaction selectivity but checking every qualifier of every rule called would slow SYNLMA significantly. This level of consideration would more reasonably be done after several strategies had been chosen for further investigation. Our experiments with reaction taxonomies are discussed later in this paper. Without the constraints SYNLMA finds more paths but is less efficient in its generation of viable synthetic pathways. [Pg.115]

While having too many "chemical restrictions," the reaction rules have no "structural restrictions." In Fig. 6, which shows the first retro-synthetic steps SYNLMA considered for cocaine synthesis, we see that four Bredt s rule violations, enamines 27a,b and 28a.b were accepted as subgoals. While discussing Fig. 6, it should be noted that structures 22, 23, 24, and 26 are not allowed when constraints are on. Structures 23, 24, 27, and 28 are typical of current SYNLMA output. When it finds a reaction rule, it applies the rule exhaustively. Structures 29 and 30 are not synthetically demodulated and represent wasted CPU time. Finally, one second generation structure, 31, is shown because it represents an interesting variation of an N-oxide ene cycloaddition reaction that has been used to synthesize tropanol (16), the basic cocaine ring system. [Pg.115]

We may also ask for an T -specification of the final equilibrium state. In this case we ignore the relative amounts in the phases and we ignore the extents of reaction. However, the (R reaction-equilibrium constraints (7.6.3) still apply, so the generalized phase rule (9.1.13) becomes... [Pg.445]

Constraints In many cases, certain ways ut a reaction which are legal according to f the reaction site, constraints and the eld products which are undesired In the 3) we wish to avoid formation of double bridgeheads (Bredt s rule) We supply, as nstraint, the name of a superatom called s previously defined as substructure 12 toms represent linknodes" and are used to ath of atoms of a given length or range of unstarred atoms in substructure J 2 are ads, the linknodes the three associated double bond in J 2 is to one of the toms, completing an expression of the... [Pg.200]

For a PVnr system of uniform T and P containing N species and 7T phases at thermodynamic equiUbrium, the intensive state of the system is fully deterrnined by the values of T, P, and the (N — 1) independent mole fractions for each of the equiUbrium phases. The total number of these variables is then 2 + 7t N — 1). The independent equations defining or constraining the equiUbrium state are of three types equations 218 or 219 of phase-equiUbrium, N 7t — 1) in number equation 245 of chemical reaction equiUbrium, r in number and equations of special constraint, s in number. The total number of these equations is A(7t — 1) + r -H 5. The number of equations of reaction equiUbrium r is the number of independent chemical reactions, and may be deterrnined by a systematic procedure (6). Special constraints arise when conditions are imposed, such as forming the system from particular species, which allow one or more additional equations to be written connecting the phase-rule variables (6). [Pg.502]

The pragmatic consideration is that if a student were to undertake this reaction, then it would be important to react corresponding amounts of the two reactants. Amount here implies the number of moles, and the unbalanced version of the equation would imply that equal volumes of reactant solutions (if the same concentration) were needed, when actually twice as much alkali solution would be needed as acid solution because the acid is dibasic. The principled point is that the equation represents a chemical process, which is subject to the constraints of conservation rules matter (as energy) is conserved. In a chemical change, the elements present (whether as elements or in compounds), must be conserved. A balanced equation has the same elements in the quantities represented on both sides ... [Pg.91]

Here va and va are the stoichiometric coefficients for the reaction. The formulation is easily extended to treat a set of coupled chemical reactions. Reactive MPC dynamics again consists of free streaming and collisions, which take place at discrete times x. We partition the system into cells in order to carry out the reactive multiparticle collisions. The partition of the multicomponent system into collision cells is shown schematically in Fig. 7. In each cell, independently of the other cells, reactive and nonreactive collisions occur at times x. The nonreactive collisions can be carried out as described earlier for multi-component systems. The reactive collisions occur by birth-death stochastic rules. Such rules can be constructed to conserve mass, momentum, and energy. This is especially useful for coupling reactions to fluid flow. The reactive collision model can also be applied to far-from-equilibrium situations, where certain species are held fixed by constraints. In this case conservation laws... [Pg.109]

These rules do not apply strictly, but provide useful guidelines for synthesis design. The rules are generally not applicable to electrocydic reactions or to substrates containing non-second-period elements (e.g. P or S), because their longer bond lengths imply different geometric constraints. [Pg.309]

Some other analysts express the opposite concern, that prices might rise to levels deemed to pose an unacceptable risk to European industry, and that to prevent this risk the system should contain a price cap or safety valve (e.g. Bouttes et al., 2006). Our assessment of phase II, in terms of both supply-demand balance and the economics of competitiveness over the 5-year period, leads us to be sceptical that this is a realistic concern. It is, however, true that a planned response to any such eventuality would be better than a panic-based reaction such as occurred in the California NOx trading system. Should prices rise to levels that were judged to pose a credible threat to competitiveness of a particular sector, and State-aid rules prevented auction revenues being used to assist it (or the country concerned had not conducted any auctions), the most obvious first step would be to relax supplementarity constraints, and possibly expand the scope of emission credits that could qualify for compliance purposes. We do not consider issues of price ceilings or safety valves beyond this. [Pg.23]

The Woodward-Hoffmann rules arise fundamentally from the conservation of orbital symmetry seen in the correlation diagrams. These powerful constraints govern which pericyclic reactions can take place and with what stereochemistry. As we have seen, frontier orbital interactions are consistent with these features,... [Pg.221]

Criteria and guidelines useful in network elucidation and supplementing the rules derived in this chapter include considerations of steric effects, molecularities of postulated reaction steps, and thermodynamic constraints as well as Tolman s 16- or 18-electron rule for reactions involving transition-metal complexes and the Woodward-Hoffmann exclusion rules based on the principle of conservation of molecular orbital symmetry. Auxiliary techniques that can be brought to bear include, among others, determinations of isomer distribution, isotope techniques, and spectrophotometry. [Pg.191]


See other pages where Reaction rule constraints is mentioned: [Pg.114]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.1514]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.133]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 , Pg.108 , Pg.111 ]




SEARCH



Reaction rule

Rules reaction rule

© 2024 chempedia.info