Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction kinetics, distinguishing

In contrast to the ionization of C q after vibrational excitation, typical multiphoton ionization proceeds via the excitation of higher electronic levels. In principle, multiphoton ionization can either be used to generate ions and to study their reactions, or as a sensitive detection technique for atoms, molecules, and radicals in reaction kinetics. The second application is more common. In most cases of excitation with visible or UV laser radiation, a few photons are enough to reach or exceed the ionization limit. A particularly important teclmique is resonantly enlianced multiphoton ionization (REMPI), which exploits the resonance of monocluomatic laser radiation with one or several intennediate levels (in one-photon or in multiphoton processes). The mechanisms are distinguished according to the number of photons leading to the resonant intennediate levels and to tire final level, as illustrated in figure B2.5.16. Several lasers of different frequencies may be combined. [Pg.2135]

One may wonder why it is important to distinguish between and keep track of these two energies and Dq, when it seems that one would do. Actually, both are important. The bond energy Dg dominates theoretical comparisons and the dissociation energy Dq, which is the ground state of the real molecule, is used in practical applications like calculating thermodynamic properties and reaction kinetics. [Pg.307]

Mechanism III cannot be distinguished from the first two on the basis of kinetics alone, because the reactive species shown is in rapid equilibrium with the anion and therefore equivalent to it in terms of reaction kinetics. [Pg.490]

Another term often used in reaction kinetics is molecularity . In order to distinguish this term from order of a reaction, present reference is drawn to the formation of N H3 from H2 and N2, as shown in the equation below ... [Pg.296]

When examining the first moments of the reaction, the kinetic constant k3 is usually small enough to be neglected. If the enzyme is inactivated, the acyl-enzyme cannot be kinetically distinguished from the Michaelis complex. Thus, the minimum kinetic scheme for inactivation is described by Eq. 11.2 ... [Pg.361]

One feature that distinguishes the education of the chemical engineer from that of other engineers is an exposure to the basic concepts of chemical reaction kinetics and chemical reactor design. This textbook provides a judicious introductory level overview of these subjects. Emphasis is placed on the aspects of chemical kinetics and material and energy balances that form the foundation for the practice of reactor design. [Pg.598]

In the biomedical literature (e.g. solute = enzyme, drug, etc.), values of kf and kr are often estimated from kinetic experiments that do not distinguish between diffusive transport in the external medium and chemical reaction effects. In that case, reaction kinetics are generally assumed to be rate-limiting with respect to mass transport. This assumption is typically confirmed by comparing the adsorption transient to maximum rates of diffusive flux to the cell surface. Values of kf and kr are then determined from the start of short-term experiments with either no (determination of kf) or a finite concentration (determination of kT) of initial surface bound solute [189]. If the rate constant for the reaction at the cell surface is near or equal to (cf. equation (16)), then... [Pg.475]

It has in general been the objective of many mechanistic studies dealing with inorganic electron-transfer reactions to distinguish between outer- and inner-sphere mechanisms. Along these lines high-pressure kinetic methods and the construction of reaction volume profiles have also been employed to contribute toward a better understanding of the intimate mechanisms involved in such processes. The differentiation between outer- and inner-sphere mechanisms depends... [Pg.38]

Nuclei provide a large number of spectroscopic probes for the investigation of solid state reaction kinetics. At the same time these probes allow us to look into the atomic dynamics under in-situ conditions. However, the experimental and theoretical methods needed to obtain relevant results in chemical kinetics, and particularly in atomic dynamics, are rather laborious. Due to characteristic hyperfine interactions, nuclear spectroscopies can, in principle, identify atomic particles and furthermore distinguish between different SE s of the same chemical component on different lattice sites. In addition to the analytical aspect of these techniques, nuclear spectroscopy informs about the microscopic motion of the nuclear probes. In Table 16-2 the time windows for the different methods are outlined. [Pg.404]

If the aim of the catalytic process is to optimize yield and selectivity, one can distinguish two extremes fast reactions and slow reactions (Figure 25). In slow reactions, the intrinsic reaction kinetics control the process, so the catalyst inventory should be as high as possible. Increasing the wall thickness of a monolith can have the desired effect. In fact the degree of variation in this way is virtually from 10-90 volume %, whereas a packed bed will always yield an inventory of around 60% or lower if hollow catalyst particles are used. [Pg.231]

The three routes are not always kinetically distinguishable. Silversmith and Smith (1958), for example, mentioned that the second-order kinetics in the reaction of l,l-diphenyl-2-fluoroethylene with ethoxide ion fits a reaction via a carbanionic intermediate, or the formation of a fluoroether, if the latter is either formed rapidly and decomposed slowly (kikzKk-i + kz ki), or if it formed in a rate-determining step (k1k2l(k-l + k2Xki). [Pg.369]

During experiments performed at constant feed rates, the conversion changes as a consequence of the deactivation of the catalyst. This implies that a single experiment can not distinguish between the influence of coke and that of conversion on the reaction kinetics and the rate of coke formation. [Pg.102]

Another way to distinguish between the effects of coke and conversion is to perform a series of experiments at a constant inlet hydrocarbon pressure, but different space times. In these experiments a given conversion corresponds with different coke levels. Interpolation at a given conversion and at a selected coke content permits to unravel the effects of both variables on the reaction kinetics. [Pg.103]


See other pages where Reaction kinetics, distinguishing is mentioned: [Pg.382]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.992]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.5]   


SEARCH



Distinguishable

Reaction kinetics, distinguishing adsorption from surface

© 2024 chempedia.info