Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction-extraction models

Conceptually more developed models, i.e. reaction-extraction models, for beds consisting of spherical porous particles, were suggested using some modified approaches, such as extraction and difiusion going on consecutively with chemical reaction. The first of such models was suggested by Goto, et. al. [8] for wood de-lignification. Their model attempted to handle both the reaction-extraction phenomena, as well as the transfer of material to the bulk flow. [Pg.505]

Mass spectrometry methods based on soft ionization techniques, 59,61,88,89 matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF), have been successfully applied for the direct analysis of grape and wine extracts and for monitoring flavonoid reactions in model solution studies. They give access to the molecular weights of the different species present in a fraction or extract and, through fragmentation patterns, provide important information on their constitutive units. Description of the various MS techniques can be found in Chapters 1 and 2. [Pg.271]

For example, when we consider the design of specialty chemical, polymer, biological, electronic materials, etc. processes, the separation units are usually described by transport-limited models, rather than the thermodynamically limited models encountered in petrochemical processes (flash drums, plate distillations, plate absorbers, extractions, etc.). Thus, from a design perspective, we need to estimate vapor-liquid-solid equilibria, as well as transport coefficients. Similarly, we need to estimate reaction kinetic models for all kinds of reactors, for example, chemical, polymer, biological, and electronic materials reactors, as well as crystallization kinetics, based on the molecular structures of the components present. Furthermore, it will be necessary to estimate constitutive equations for the complex materials we will encounter in new processes. [Pg.537]

The experimental data reported in the Table for gas phase have been extracted from measurements in dioxane solution by applying the Onsager reaction field model to eliminate the solvent effect [37], By contrast, the cyclohexane experimental dipole moments have been obtained from those reported in Ref. [37] re-including the proper reaction field factors. Once recalled these facts, we note that the observed solvent-induced changes on both ground and excited state dipole moments are quantitatively reproduced by the calculations. [Pg.192]

Effect of Temperature on Reaction Rate. The Klason lignin contents of red spruce residue extracted by methylamlne at four different temperatures along with the predicted curves from the reaction-diffusion model are shown In Figure 2. [Pg.323]

Figure 2. Comparison of the extent of delignificatlon predicted by the reaction-diffusion model with the measured Klason lignin contents In the residues obtained from supercritical methylamlne extraction of red spruce at 276 bar, 1 g/mln solvent flow rate, and four different temperatures (170, 175, 180, and 185 C). Figure 2. Comparison of the extent of delignificatlon predicted by the reaction-diffusion model with the measured Klason lignin contents In the residues obtained from supercritical methylamlne extraction of red spruce at 276 bar, 1 g/mln solvent flow rate, and four different temperatures (170, 175, 180, and 185 C).
Pales and Stroeve [31] investigated the effect of the continuous phase mass transfer resistance on solute extraction with double emulsion in a batch reactor. They presented an extension of the perturbation analysis technique to give a solution of the model equations of Ho et al. [29] taking external phase mass transfer resistance into account. Kim et al. [5] also developed an unsteady-state advancing reaction front model considering an additional thin outer liquid membrane layer and neglecting the continuous phase resistance. [Pg.148]

Dutta et al. [32] modified the pseudo-steady-state advancing reaction front model of Stroeve and Varanasi [30] by considering the polydispersity of the emulsion globules and the external phase mass transfer resistance. They also included the outer membrane film resistance in their model [5]. Their results were in good agreement with experimental data for phenol extraction. [Pg.148]

What can also be concluded is that the kinetics of forming the urea compound by further reaction of the carbamic acid are very different for this polymer relative to the model system of aminopropyl disiloxane. There is continued interest in the reaction/extraction concept and research is ongoing to more conclusively establish the true nature of the reactions. [Pg.250]

Asai et al. (1994) have developed a reaction model for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol using hypochlorite ion in the presence of a PT catalyst. Based on the film theory, they develop analytic expressions for the mass-transfer rate of QY across the interface and for the inter-facial concentration of QY. Recently, Bhattacharya (1996) has developed a simple and general framework for modeling PTC reactions in liquid-liquid systems. The uniqueness of this approach stems from the fact that it can model complex multistep reactions in both aqueous and organic phases, and thus could model both normal and inverse PTC reactions. The model does not resort to the commonly made pseudo-steady-state assumption, nor does it assume extractive equilibrium. This unified framework was validated with experimental data from a number of previous articles for both PTC and IPTC systems. [Pg.13]

Unfortunately, the increasing complexity of radical polymerization processes (which may contain hundreds or thousands of kinetically distinct reactions) can signihcantly hinder experimental efforts to extract this information for all but the simplest systems. The fundamental problem is that experimental techniques can only measure the observables of a process—typically the time-dependent concentrations of some of the major species or (more often) some of the major functional groups. Linking this macroscopic information to the microscopic properties of the process (i.e., the rate coefficients of the individual reactions) requires model-based assumptions, which can be subject to signihcant errors [6]. [Pg.286]

This approach of considering the organic phase as ideal with all the nonidealities in the number of reactions, respectively of the complexes is quite often used in reactive solvent extraction modeling, even neglecting the aqueous phase nonideality. This approach results in system specific... [Pg.470]

PA-6 (90-80)/EAA (10-20) or EMAA ionomer/TPPite (1) or trialkyl phosphite condensing agent SSE at 265-315 °C/selective solvent extraction/model compound reactions/ FTIR/ C NMR/ P NMR Aharoni et al. 1984 Aharoni 1983... [Pg.555]

The main point of this approach is to apply the method of eigenvalues and eigenvectors analysis to obtain the kinetic pattern through the sensitivity parameters. Information extracted in such a manner for different reaction times enables to identify effectively the unimportant steps in the reaction kinetic model. [Pg.40]

Antioxidative Activity of MaUlard Reaction Extracts. In the antioxidative assay system utilized in this study heptanal was readily oxidized to heptanoic acid in the dichloromethane solutions. However, the presence of a-tocopherol (Figure 1) inhibited this transformation in a concentration dependent manner. This system was then used to evaluate the antioxidative activity of dichloromethane extracts of several Maillard reaction model systems. Figure 2 shows the antioxidative activity of 5- iL aliquots of each pH extract from a microwave heated glucose/cysteine model system. The order of antioxidative effect of the extracts from the samples was as follows pH 9 > pH 5 > pH 2 > pH 7. The Maillard reaction is catalyzed under both slightly basic and acidic conditions and may explain this trend. Volatiles from sugar/cysteine Maillard reaction... [Pg.250]

The low solubility in the aqneons phase of metal organic extractants reduces the possible locations of the rate controlling reaction to (1) the diffnsional aqueous film and (2) the interfacial plane itself. Fignre 6.1 gives a representation of the concentration profiles corresponding to an interfacial reaction. A model that considers a reaction region of variable thickness has been proposed by Hnghes and Rod [13]. [Pg.204]


See other pages where Reaction-extraction models is mentioned: [Pg.535]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.844]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.1012]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.791]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.2144]    [Pg.55]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.500 , Pg.505 ]




SEARCH



Extraction model

Reactions extraction

© 2024 chempedia.info