Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Radicals from sonochemical reactions

When ultrasound is used as energy carrier, a sound intensity in the range from 5-10 W cm-2 is employed. This energy is sufficient to heat the material up to or even above its melting point. As a result, the diffusion velocity of the free radicals in turn increased. In addition, in the fluid phase of the matrix, sonochemical reactions are possible, based on cavitation. Such cavitation is associated with... [Pg.95]

This fast, easily performed variant to the Hunsdiecker procedure, applies successfully to primary, secondary, or tertiary esters, even unsaturated ones (p. 353). From citronellic acid, despite the presence of a double bond in a position permitting cyclization, the latter reaction was not detected. Mechanistically, the sonochemical reaction differs from the photochemical analogue, during which the initiation occurs from the cleavage of the thiohydroxamic ester itself. The initiation probably takes place in the bubble then the halogen atom couples with the alkyl radical in the solution, possibly by a chain mechanism. [Pg.68]

A follow up work by Brotchie et al. [42] noted that the resonance sizes of sono-luminescence and sonochemically active bubbles are different. The sonochemilu-minescence, resulting from the reaction between OH radicals generated within cavitation bubbles and luminol molecules, intensity was used to determine the sono-ehemically active (SCL) bubbles. The resonance size of SL bubbles are found to be relatively larger than that of SCL bubbles. In addition, Eq. (1.2) shows that the resonance size decreases with an increase in ultrasonic frequency. Brotchie et al. [42] have also confirmed this experimentally. The sizes were found to be 3.9, 3.2, 2.9, 2.7 and 2 pm at 213, 355, 647, 875 and 1056 kHz frequency, respectively. Another important aspect that needs to be mentioned is the difference between theoretical and experimentally determined resonance sizes of the cavitation bubbles. Equation (1.2) provides a theoretical value of 14 pm at 213 kHz whereas the experimental value is found to be 3.9 pm. This is also known from single bubble work at 20 kHz where the experimental resonance size was found to be about 5 pm compared to the theoretical value of 150 pm [43]. The difference between the resonance size determined by Eq. (1.2) and experimental value is due to the fact that Eq. (1.2) is a very simplified one that does not consider the physical properties of the liquid or bubble contents. [Pg.13]

In 1983 Suslick reported the effects of high intensity (ca. 100 W cm, 20 kHz) irradiation of alkanes at 25 °C under argon [47]. These conditions are of course, well beyond those which would be produced in a reaction vessel immersed in an ultrasonic bath and indeed those normally used for sonochemistry with a probe. Under these extreme conditions the primary products were H2, CH4, C2H2 and shorter chain alk-l-enes. These results are not dissimilar from those produced by high temperature (> 1200 °C) alkane pyrolyses. The principal degradation process under ultrasonic irradiation was considered to be C-C bond fission with the production of radicals. By monitoring the decomposition of Fe(CO)5 in different alkanes it was possible to demonstrate the inverse relationship between sonochemical effect (i. e. the energy of cavitational collapse) and solvent vapour pressure [48],... [Pg.88]

The majority of systems studied have been aqueous solutions of either aromatic compounds or halogenated hydrocarbons. Such materials represent models for the major classes of organic pollutants in waste and ground water. The primary products resulting from the sonochemical treatment of phenol at 541 kHz (27 °C with bubbled air) are hydroquinone and catechol [22]. These compounds are easy to monitor and are clearly seen to be intermediates which disappear as the reaction progresses (Fig. 4.1). Similarly the sonolysis of aqueous 4-chlorophenol leads to products mainly characteristic of oxidation by OH radical e. g. 4-chlorocatechol but in both cases the final organic products are CO, CO2 and HCOOH (Scheme 4.2) [22-25]. [Pg.138]

Romanian scientists compared one-electron transfer reactions from triphenylmethyl or 2-methyl benzoyl chloride to nitrobenzene in thermal (210°C) conditions and on ultrasonic stimulation at 50°C (lancu et al. 1992, Vinatoru et al. 1994, Chivu et al. 2006). In the first step, the chloride cation-radical and the nitrobenzene anion-radicals are formed. In the thermal and acoustic variants, the reactions lead to the same set of products with one important exception The thermal reaction results in the formation of HCl, whereas ultrasonic stimulation results in CI2 evolution. At present, it is difficult to elucidate the mechanisms behind these two reactions. As an important conclusion, the sonochemical process goes through the inner-sphere electron transfer. The outer-sphere electron transfer mechanism is operative in the thermally induced process. [Pg.281]

Lead(IV) in acidic media has been found to promote oxidative addition of Cl-, CF3CO2-, AcO-, MeS03- and CIO4- to cyclohexene, 1-hexene and styrene433. Sonochemical switching from ionic to radical pathway in the reactions of styrene and fraws-/l-methylstyrene with (AcO Pb has been observed434. [Pg.1197]

For all these reasons, most of the acoustical energy involved in generating the cavities and in their collapse is ultimately spent in decomposing water into H2 and 02. This is the main factor affecting sonochemical efficiency (i.e., the ratio between the rate of the reaction of interest and the applied power density, W/L). In order to improve the efficiency of a sonochemical process, chemical or physical modifications can be introduced into the system, which may reduce this loss (see Sec. IV.G). The efficiency can also be affected by the presence of other chemicals in the solution, which may react with the radicals, thus reducing the number of reactive species available to the target molecules. A preprocess might be conceived to separate some of these unwanted chemicals from the solution prior to sonochemical treatment. [Pg.214]

Sonication allows changing the normal course of the reaction and gives preferentially the latter compound, in amounts depending on the irradiation conditions and the acoustic intensity. s The SrnI pathway is even more important under standing-wave conditions. A direct link is thus established between a particular mechanism and the presence of an acoustic field. A complete interpretation is missing, however, and the presence of by-products derived from the 4-nitrobenzyl radical was not evidenced. Since the nitronate anion is not expected to vaporize, and a reaction in the bulk liquid should exhibit no sonochemical effect, it can be deduced that the sonochemical process takes place at the bubble interface. [Pg.86]

The addition of anthracene to maleic anhydride (Fig. 11) was reported to be accelerated by sonication. From a mechanistic study in the presence of electron carriers, an electron transfer process was ruled out. These results could not be reproduced, and no difference between the sonochemical and thermal rates and yields was observed (adduct formation in 30% after 1 h, 50% after 3 h, with or without sonication). In the presence of monoelectronic oxidizers such as ferric chloride,or tris(4-bromophenyl)aminyl hexachloroantimonate (TBPA),28a,c change was noted in these figures, although the radical cation of anthracene was formed.43 This radical cation is not involved in the reaction pathway. [Pg.102]

From the empirical systematization of sonochemistry, it is sufficient to remember that, when the possibility exists, radical pathways are privileged at the expense of polar pathways, and sonochemical switching can result in a number of cases. In heterogeneous systems, reactions which follow ionic mechanisms are still sensitive to the mechanical effects of sonication. This "false sonochemistry" can, in principle, also be observed when efficient mixing techniques are applied, but the so-called simple mechanical effects are strongly dependent on geometrical factors and prove to be much more complicated than expected. [Pg.109]

The addition of anions derived from malonate diester was studied recently (Fig. 7). Diethyl malonate adds to chalcone in the presence of catalytic amounts of potassium hydroxide and the rate is strongly influenced by sonication. The reaction is completed within 5 min at room temperature in toluene. Such a sensitivity suggested a sonication-induced change of mechanism, confirmed by experiments in the presence of catalytic amounts of DPPH. This radical scavenger partially inhibits the addition the existence of competitive chain electron transfer and polar mechanisms is suggested. Direct evidence is, however, missing. The additions of ethyl cyanoacetate, ethyl acetylacetate, and acetyl-acetone anions display similar characteristics, but the differences between the sonochemical and silent processes are less pronounced. [Pg.120]

Three cases of Type la activations illustrate a class of reactions expected to give positive results. The first one is provided by SrnI or ETC processes. Figure 1 shows the chain mechanism of the reaction of lithium nitronate with 4-nitro-benzyl bromide established by Komblum and Russell. This reaction was expected to display sonochemical switching, which was indeed foimd. The mechanism suggests that the sonochemical activation should find its origin either in creating species 1 or 2 (no direct entry to 3 seems plausible). The creation of 1 within a cavitation bubble could result either from high-pressure-promoted electron transfer (activation volumes for some electron transfer reactions may be found in Ref. 9) or local conditions at the interface between the cavitation bubbles and the bxilk solution (Qi. 1). The creation of radical 2 could result from a direct sonolysis of the benzylic C-Br bond (p. 86) but... [Pg.379]


See other pages where Radicals from sonochemical reactions is mentioned: [Pg.152]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.2811]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.2819]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.53]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.333 , Pg.348 ]




SEARCH



Radicals from

Radicals from reactions

Sonochemical

Sonochemically

© 2024 chempedia.info