Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quenching surface traps

All these results can be explained in terms of the model proposed above (cf. Fig. 11). Namely, with ferrous oxalate having a standard redox potential E° (Ox/R) of —0.2 V (SCE), which is a little more negative than the E of the surface trapped hole located ca. 0.5 V above E , the surface trapped hole is effectively quenched by the rapid reduction, and the photoanodic current flows without decomposition. With ferrocyanide, having an E(0x/R) of 0.2 V (SCE), which is more positive than the E of the surface trapped hole, the surface trapped holes are accumulated to the extent that the surface potential created will level it down to the E(0x/R) of the redox couple. At this point, the rates of nu-cleophillic attack of H2O and OH to the surface trapped holes are still low and the electrode decomposition is prevented. [Pg.155]

The reactions of alkali halide and other salt molecules in the gas phase are of considerable interest to high temperature chemists reactions of CsF in either the gas phase or condensed phases are also of interest to catalytic chemists. The matrix isolation technique has proven itself valuable in the area of high temperature chemistry while inert matrices are condensed at 15 K, the technique allows a high temperature reaction to be initiated in front of the cold surface and then rapidly quenched to trap the initial products of the high temperature reaction. [Pg.343]

Intraband relaxation in most systems occurs on timescales that are short relative to the spontaneous emission lifetimes of the intraband transition, and this has hindered potential applications of intraband transitions for infrared detection and emission. Quantum dots with large number of surface traps have however been shown to rapidly extract electrons from the P levels of the nanocrystal. Mid infrared photons incident on such a material induce a PL quench at room temperatures, allowing for the visualization of mid-infrared light. [Pg.143]

Photoluminescence emission spectra of ZnO/PVA nanocomposite fihns under an excitation at 325 nm showed an intense PL emission centered around 364 nm, and a weaker and broad emission around 397 nm. ZnO/ PVA nanocomposite films prepared with OA modified ZnO nanoparticles compared to films prepared with pristine ZnO. The PL emissions observed in ZnO nanorods at 468 and 563 nm decrease considerably in intensity and are almost quenched in the composite films. The green emission in ZnO originates mainly from the deep surface traps, which can almost be removed via surface passivation by the polymer. Figure 12.13 shows the PL spectra of PVA and ZnO/PVA nanocomposite thin films for three different concentrations, 1, 2 and 3 wt% of OA modified ZnO, which gives maximum PL intensity. The composite films show intense luminescence emission centered aroimd 364 nm in the UV region and intensity of this emission peak is foimd to increase with an increase of ZnO content in the composite. The PL intensity at 397 nm is found to be more prominent in this case. The surface modification of ZnO by the polymer matrix removes defect states within ZnO and facilitates sharp near-band-edge PL emission at 364 nm. [Pg.474]

The surface-state model, in which the luminescent recombination occurs via surface states, was proposed to explain certain properties of the PL from PS, for example long decay times or sensitivity of the PL on chemical environment. In the frame of this model the long decay times are a consequence of trapping of free carriers in localized states a few hundred meV below the bandgap of the confined crystallite. The sensitivity of the PL to the chemical environment is interpreted as formation of a trap or change of a trap level by a molecule bonding to the surface of a PS crystallite. The surface-state model suffers from the fact that most known traps, e.g. the Pb center, quench the PL [Me9], while the kinds of surface state proposed to cause the PL could not be identified. [Pg.157]

A Stern-Volmer plot obtained in the presence of donors for the stilbene isomerization has both curved and linear components. Two minimal mechanistic schemes were proposed to explain this unforeseen complexity they differ as to whether the adsorption of the quencher on the surface competes with that of the reactant or whether each species has a preferred site and is adsorbed independently. In either mechanism, quenching of a surface adsorbed radical cation by a quencher in solution is required In an analogous study on ZnS with simple alkenes, high turnover numbers were observed at active sites where trapped holes derived from surface states (sulfur radicals from zinc vacancies or interstitial sulfur) play a decisive role... [Pg.93]

Electron transfer can be accomplished by quenching of a micelle trapped chromophore by ions capable of ion pairing with the micelle surface. For example, excited N-methylphenothiazine in sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) micelles can exchange electrons with Cu(II). The photogenerated Cu(I) is rapidly displaced by Cu(II) from the aqueous phase so that intramicellar recombination is averted, Fig. 5 (266). Similarly, the quantum yield for formation of the pyrene radical cation via electron transfer to Cu(II) increases with micellar complexation from 0.25 at 0.05 M SDS to 0.60 at 0.8 M SDS (267). The electron transfer quenching of triplet thionine by aniline is also accelerated in reverse micelles by this mechanism (268). [Pg.291]

The first two possibilities have been showm to be unlikely. Deliberate dopings and treatments known to increase the population of surface defects lead to the quenching of the photoluminescence (86). Moreover, surface defects are annealed at high temperatures, whereas sample treatment at high temperatures is required to observe the photoluminescence (87). Although it has been suggested that trapped electron centers (FJ) could play a role (88,89), it has been concluded by Coluccia (13) that the photolumines-cent sites are of the same nature as the absorbing sites and the emission process is as described by Eq. (12). [Pg.146]


See other pages where Quenching surface traps is mentioned: [Pg.310]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.900]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.213]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.160 , Pg.168 ]




SEARCH



Surface quenching

© 2024 chempedia.info