Quantum mechanics semiclassical dynamics

The mapping approach outlined above has been designed to furnish a well-defined classical limit of nonadiabatic quantum dynamics. The formalism applies in the same way at the quantum-mechanical, semiclassical (see Section VIII), and quasiclassical level, respectively. Most important, no additional assumptions but the standard semiclassical and quasi-classical approximations are needed to get from one level to another. Most of the established mixed quantum-classical methods such as the mean-field-trajectory method or the surface-hopping approach do invoke additional assumptions. The comparison of the mapping approach to these formulations may therefore (i) provide insight into the nature of these additional approximation and (ii) indicate whether the conceptual virtues of the mapping approach may be expected to result in practical advantages. 

Both the BO dynamics and Gaussian wavepacket methods described above in Section n separate the nuclear and electronic motion at the outset, and use the concept of potential energy surfaces. In what is generally known as the Ehrenfest dynamics method, the picture is still of semiclassical nuclei and quantum mechanical electrons, but in a fundamentally different approach the electronic wave function is propagated at the same time as the pseudoparticles. These are driven by standard classical equations of motion, with the force provided by an instantaneous potential energy function... 

The preferable theoretical tools for the description of dynamical processes in systems of a few atoms are certainly quantum mechanical calculations. There is a large arsenal of powerful, well established methods for quantum mechanical computations of processes such as photoexcitation, photodissociation, inelastic scattering and reactive collisions for systems having, in the present state-of-the-art, up to three or four atoms, typically. " Both time-dependent and time-independent numerically exact algorithms are available for many of the processes, so in cases where potential surfaces of good accuracy are available, excellent quantitative agreement with experiment is generally obtained. In addition to the full quantum-mechanical methods, sophisticated semiclassical approximations have been developed that for many cases are essentially of near-quantitative accuracy and certainly at a level sufficient for the interpretation of most experiments.These methods also are com-... 

For example, the ZN theory, which overcomes all the defects of the Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg theory, can be incorporated into various simulation methods in order to clarify the mechanisms of dynamics in realistic molecular systems. Since the nonadiabatic coupling is a vector and thus we can always determine the relevant one-dimensional (ID) direction of the transition in multidimensional space, the 1D ZN theory can be usefully utilized. Furthermore, the comprehension of reaction mechanisms can be deepened, since the formulas are given in simple analytical expressions. Since it is not feasible to treat realistic large systems fully quantum mechanically, it would be appropriate to incorporate the ZN theory into some kind of semiclassical methods. The promising semiclassical methods are (1) the initial value... 

One can also ask about the relationship of the FMS method, as opposed to AIMS, with other wavepacket and semiclassical nonadiabatic dynamics methods. We first compare FMS to previous methods in cases where there is no spawning, and then proceed to compare with previous methods for nonadiabatic dynamics. We stress that we have always allowed for spawning in our applications of the method, and indeed the whole point of the FMS method is to address problems where localized nuclear quantum mechanical effects are important. Nevertheless, it is useful to place the method in context by asking how it relates to previous methods in the absence of its adaptive basis set character. There have been many attempts to use Gaussian basis functions in wavepacket dynamics, and we cannot mention all of these. Instead, we limit ourselves to those methods that we feel are most closely related to FMS, with apologies to those that are not included. A nice review that covers some of the... 

For larger systems, various approximate schemes have been developed, called mixed methods as they treat parts of the system using different levels of theory. Of interest to us here are quantum-semiclassical methods, which use full quantum mechanics to treat the electrons, but use approximations based on trajectories in a classical phase space to describe the nuclear motion. The prefix quantum may be dropped, and we will talk of semiclassical methods. There are a number of different approaches, but here we shall concentrate on the few that are suitable for direct dynamics molecular simulations. An overview of other methods is given in the introduction of [21]. 

How well do these quantum-semiclassical methods work in describing the dynamics of non-adiabatic systems There are two sources of errors, one due to the approximations in the methods themselves, and the other due to errors in their application, for example, lack of convergence. For example, an obvious source of error in surface hopping and Ehrenfest dynamics is that coherence effects due to the phases of the nuclear wavepackets on the different surfaces are not included. This information is important for the description of short-time (few femtoseconds) quantum mechanical effects. For longer timescales, however, this loss of information should be less of a problem as dephasing washes out this information. Note that surface hopping should be run in an adiabatic representation, whereas the other methods show no preference for diabatic or adiabatic. 

Second, the mapping approach to nonadiabatic quantum dynamics is reviewed in Sections VI-VII. Based on an exact quantum-mechanical formulation, this approach allows us in several aspects to go beyond the scope of standard mixed quantum-classical methods. In particular, we study the classical phase space of a nonadiabatic system (including the discussion of vibronic periodic orbits) and the semiclassical description of nonadiabatic quantum mechanics via initial-value representations of the semiclassical propagator. The semiclassical spin-coherent state method and its close relation to the mapping approach is discussed in Section IX. Section X summarizes our results and concludes with some general remarks. 

Since and M" are equivalent in the physical subspace, both Hamiltonians generate the same quantum dynamics in this subspace. However, this is not necessarily true if approximations are employed in the evaluation of the dynamics. For example, adopting a semiclassical approximation, the quantum-mechanically equivalent Hamiltonians H and El may yield different results. Experience shows that it is useful first to transform the Hamiltonian on the... 

The previous discussion shows that the relaxation processes emerge from the quantum dynamics under appropriate circumstances leading to the formation of time-dependent quasiclassical parts in the observable quantities. Let us add that quasiclassical and semiclassical methods have been recently applied to the optical response of quantum systems in several works [65, 66] where the relation to the Liouville formulation of quantum mechanics has been discussed, without however pointing out the existence of Liouvillian resonances as we discussed here above. The connection between the property of chaos and n-time correlation functions or the nth-order response of a system in multiple-pulse experiments has also been discussed [67, 68]. 

The absorbing potential factor is the only nonstandard feature in Eq. (3.1). Fortunately, it is much simpler to deal with the absorbing potential semiclassically than it is quantum mechanically it cannot cause any unwanted reflections in the above semiclassical expression because we have implicitly made an infinitesimal approximation for it. Thus, it does not affect the dynamics and only causes absorption see also the disscussion by Seide-man et al. [3b]. 

Mark Thachuk joined the UBC Department of Chemistry in 1996. His research program focuses on the study of the dynamics and rates of chemical reactions and processes by mathematical and computational techniques. Typically, such investigations utilize classical, semiclassical, or quantum mechanics, and combine scattering theory with reaction rate and kinetic theories. 

---