Quantum mechanical scattering theory

A chemical reaction is then described as a two-fold process. The fundamental one is the quantum mechanical interconverting process among the states, the second process is the interrelated population of the interconverting state and the relaxation process leading forward to products or backwards to reactants for a given step. These latter determine the rate at which one will measure the products. The standard quantum mechanical scattering theory of rate processes melds both aspects in one [21, 159-165], A qualitative fine tuned analysis of the chemical mechanisms enforces a disjointed view (for further analysis see below). 

Y. Sun, D. J. Kouri, D. G. Truhlar, and D. W. Schwenke, Dynamical basis sets for algebraic variational calculations in quantum-mechanical scattering theory, Phys. Rev. A 41 4857 (1990). 

Chemical reactions and their rates are central to chemical research. The quantum mechanical theory of reaction rates invokes quantum mechanical scattering theory and statistical mechanics. Thus, one considers the propagation of a system from an initial situation to a different one. Expressions for such processes are developed by means of quasi stationary nonequilibrium theory. 

In the analogous quantum theory an internal state of the molecule is defined by a set of quantum numbers, which can be represented by a single S5mibol such as i or j. Then the probability that a molecule initially in state i will make a transition to state j when it suffers a collision characterized by appropriately defined parameters p can be symbolized by q ip), and cross sections exactly analogous to those of Eqs. (2) are familiar quantities in quantum mechanical scattering theory. 

Computing the amplitudes and their phases is the subject of quantum mechanical scattering theory although, as a practical matter, semiclassical approximations are quite useful. 

The theory of chemical reactions has many facets including elaborate quantum mechanical scattering approaches that treat the kinetic energy of atoms by proper wave mechanical methods. These approaches to chemical reaction theory go far beyond the capabilities of a product like HyperChem as many of the ideas are yet to have wide-spread practical implementations. 

How to proceed with these matrix elements will depend upon which property one wishes to estimate. Let us begin by discussing the effect of the pseudopotential as a cause of diffraction by the electrons this leads to the nearly-free-electron approximation. The relation of this description to the description of the electronic structure used for other systems will be seen. We shall then compute the screening of the pseudopotential, which is necessary to obtain correct magnitudes for the form factors, and then use quantum-mechanical perturbation theory to calculate electron scattering by defects and the changes in energy that accompany distortion of the lattice. 

The authors are grateful to Yuri Volobuev for participation in early stages of the DH2 analysis and to Professor Ken Leopold for helpful discussions. The quantum mechanical scattering calculations were supported in part by the National Science Foundation. The variational transition state theory calculations were supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. 

We highlight some recent work from our laboratory on reactions of atoms and radicals with simple molecules by the crossed molecular beam scattering method with mass-spectrometric detection. Emphasis is on three-atom (Cl + H2) and four-atom (OH + H2 and OH + CO) systems for which the interplay between experiment and theory is the strongest and the most detailed. Reactive differential cross sections are presented and compared with the results of quasiclassical and quantum mechanical scattering calculations on ab initio potential energy surfaces in an effort to assess the status of theory versus experiment. 

These reactions have been studied by various theoretical methods, that is, classical trajectories, transition-state theory, and quantum mechanical scattering calculations. The accumulation of results from these studies provides a relatively complete description of this reaction system. 

In addition to the classical trajectory calculations, a variety of other theoretical studies have been done. Accurate quantum mechanical scattering results for zero total angular momentum have been reported for reaction (40). The reaction has also been studied by using transition-state theory (TST). Transition-state theory overestimates (compared to experiment) the thermal rate by a factor of about two. This may be caused by errors in the PES or to recrossings , that is, trajectories which pass through the transition state but quickly return to reactants rather than going on to form products (TST incorrectly counts these as reactive events). Studies are also being done to understand the spectroscopy of the transition state of this reaction. ... 

At the time the experiments were perfomied (1984), this discrepancy between theory and experiment was attributed to quantum mechanical resonances drat led to enhanced reaction probability in the FlF(u = 3) chaimel for high impact parameter collisions. Flowever, since 1984, several new potential energy surfaces using a combination of ab initio calculations and empirical corrections were developed in which the bend potential near the barrier was found to be very flat or even non-collinear [49, M], in contrast to the Muckennan V surface. In 1988, Sato [ ] showed that classical trajectory calculations on a surface with a bent transition-state geometry produced angular distributions in which the FIF(u = 3) product was peaked at 0 = 0°, while the FIF(u = 2) product was predominantly scattered into the backward hemisphere (0 > 90°), thereby qualitatively reproducing the most important features in figure A3.7.5. 

A3.11 Quantum mechanics of interacting systems scattering theory... 

Both quantum mechanical and classical theories of Raman scattering have been developed. The quantum mechanical treatment of Kramers and Heisenberg 5) preceded the classical theory of Cabannes and Rochard 6). 

One aspect of the mathematical treatment of the quantum mechanical theory is of particular interest. The wavefunction of the perturbed molecule (i.e. the molecule after the radiation is switched on ) involves a summation over all the stationary states of the unperturbed molecule (i.e. the molecule before the radiation is switched on ). The expression for intensity of the line arising from the transition k —> n involves a product of transition moments, MkrMrn, where r is any one of the stationary states and is often referred to as the third common level in the scattering act. 

The third common level is often invoked in simplified interpretations of the quantum mechanical theory. In this simplified interpretation, the Raman spectrum is seen as a photon absorption-photon emission process. A molecule in a lower level k absorbs a photon of incident radiation and undergoes a transition to the third common level r. The molecules in r return instantaneously to a lower level n emitting light of frequency differing from the laser frequency by —>< . This is the frequency for the Stokes process. The frequency for the anti-Stokes process would be + < . As the population of an upper level n is less than level k the intensity of the Stokes lines would be expected to be greater than the intensity of the anti-Stokes lines. This approach is inconsistent with the quantum mechanical treatment in which the third common level is introduced as a mathematical expedient and is not involved directly in the scattering process (9). 

Raman effect (continued) spectral activity, 339-341 terminology of, 295 vibrational wavefunctione, 339-341 Raman lines, 296 weak, 327-330 Raman scattering, 296 classical theory, 297-299 quantum mechanical theory, 296, 297 Raman shift, 296... 

In fact, with the help of Krein s trace formula, the quantum field theory calculation is mapped onto a quantum mechanical billiard problem of a point-particle scattered off a finite number of non-overlapping spheres or disks i.e. classically hyperbolic (or even chaotic) scattering systems. 

In cases where both the system under consideration and the observable to be calculated have an obvious classical analog (e.g., the translational-energy distribution after a scattering event), a classical description is a rather straightforward matter. It is less clear, however, how to incorporate discrete quantum-mechanical DoF that do not possess an obvious classical counterpart into a classical theory. For example, consider the well-known spin-boson problem—that is, an electronic two-state system (the spin) coupled to one or many vibrational DoF (the bosons) [5]. Exhibiting nonadiabatic transitions between discrete quantum states, the problem apparently defies a straightforward classical treatment. 

A particularly interesting feature of the theory [9] is the incorporation of deviations from Coulomb scattering due to the nonvanishing size of the projectile nucleus. The very fact that the theory is based on the Dirac equation and that spin dependences enter nontrivially indicates that quantum mechanics is essential here. Moreover, at the highest energies considered, pair production becomes important, i.e., an effect that does not have a classical equivalent [57]. 

---