Quantal test

If a preliminary dilution step is deemed necessary before the geometric dilution series, as recommended in the case of heavily polluted wastewater, the preliminary dilution step, for example, should be 1 64 or 1 128. If it is necessary to obtain LC0 values for determining the pT-value, then the geometric dilution series with the factor of 1 2 must be followed through from the first dilution step. This is required in the fish test according to DEV L31 (1989) (Section 5.3). The same is required for other quantal tests like the Daphnia test, where 9 of 10 animals must survive. 

It is possible to use a preliminary dilution step of 1 100 when the pT-scale relies, for instance, on a < 20% effect endpoint measurement (e.g., determination of IC < 20 in non quantal tests with algae and bacteria). In this case, the pT-value should be calculated from the concentration-effect curve. The pT-value is determined by using the first sample concentration that generates an effect below 20%. If, for example, the concentration incurring a 19% effect is equated with a dilution factor of 1 3200, the pT-value is calculated with equation 5 as demonstrated below. The modulus for transforming decadic logarithms into binary ones, 1 / logio 2 , yields equation 6. For the 1 100 diluted wastewater example above, the pT-value can then be calculated with the help of equation 8. 

Test sensitivity is defined as the lowest TU at which a toxic response can be observed for instance, a test run at 10% of the full concentration (e.g., 10% v/v) would have a detection limit of 10. For quantal data, this normalization step requires the determination of a minimum non toxic percent response (Rmi ), i.e., the minimum percent response which designates a sediment sample as non-toxic. The formula for quantal tests is as follows ... 

The use of supercomputers has allowed us to test the sensitivity of accurate quantal molecular energy transfer probabilities in diatom-diatom collisions to the choice of potential energy surface, even at total energies great enough to allow both diatoms to be vibrationally excited. 

Portier, C.J. and Bailer, A.J. (1989). Testing for increased carcinogenicity using a survival-adjusted quantal response test. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 12 731-737. 

Fisher s exact test should be used to compare two sets of discontinuous, quantal (all or none) data. Small sets of such data can be checked by contingency data tables, such as those of Finney et al. (1963). Larger sets, however, require computation. These include frequency data such as incidences of mortality or certain histopatho-logical findings, and so on. Thus, the data can be expressed as ratios. These data do not fit on a continuous scale of measurement but usually involve numbers of responses classified as either negative or positive that is, contingency table situation (Sokal and Rohlf, 1994). 

The curve is again identical in shape but this time a population has been studied and the frequency of response recorded at various drug doses. It is, therefore, known as a quantal dose-response curve. The marker of potency is now the ED50 and the y axis should be correctly labelled as shown. This is the typical dose-response curve that is tested in the examination. 

Statistical Methods. Means of treatment groups for plasma retention of BSP, plasma osmolality, total plasma protein concentration and urine flow rates were compared by students t test for independent sample means (17). Plasma enzyme activity data were converted to a quantal form and analyzed by the Fischer Exact Probability Test (18). Values greater than 2 standard deviations (P < 0.05) from the control value were chosen to indicate a positive response in treated fish. 

Anticonvulsants can be suitably studied by use of quantal dose-response curves. For example, to assess the potential of new anticonvulsants to control epileptic seizures in humans, these drugs are initially tested for their ability to protect animals against experimentally induced seizures. In the presence of a given dose of the drug, the animal either has the seizure or does not that is, it either is or is not protected. Thus, in the design of this experiment, the effect of the drug (protection) is all or none. This type of response, in contrast to a graded response, must be described in a noncontinuous manner. 

Quantal toxicity tests employing organisms such as daphnids or fish do not alter the concentration of contaminant(s) in a given volume of water because they are directly introduced into their respective experimental containers. In contrast, bioassays undertaken with algae and bacteria somewhat dilute the test material since they must be introduced into test containers (i.e., flasks, tubes or microplate wells) via a certain volume of inoculum. In such tests, the volume share of the test culture can sometimes reach 20 % in the test preparation, which corresponds to a dilution of 1 1.25 (Tab. 2). This dilution stage is therefore the highest concentration that can be examined with such microbial tests. 

Microbiological tests such as the Microtox test report a non-quantal endpoint, which is an IC50. ECs are for quantal data (e.g., of immobilised daphnids). 

Multi-concentration tests measure the effect of test concentrations on a quantal (all-or-none) or graded/quantitative (e.g., weight of the organism, number of offspring produced) variable. An example of a quantal endpoint would be a... 

Determination of the effect of a material or substance on a group of selected organisms (e.g., Vibrio fischeri), under defined conditions. An aquatic toxicity test usually measures either (a) the proportions of organisms affected (quantal) or (b) the degree of effect shown (quantitative or graded), after exposure to specific concentrations of test material or complex mixture (e.g., chemical, effluent, elutriate, leachate, or receiving water). Volume 1(2,10). 

Two basic measures are taken, the number of animals per group which fall off the rod within the 3 minute test and the drop-off times. The quantal data (number of animals falling) are analyzed using Fisher s Exact probability Test. The quantitative data (drop-off times) are analyzed using Student s t-tests. 

Bio-validation is a limit test, which at best produces quantal data. Each BI should be tested separately for survivors or absence of survivors. The acceptance criterion should be that there are no survivors. 

The Dixon Up-Down technique was first described in the statistical literature in 1947. It is designed to estimate an ED50 in clinical trials or toxicological tests, when a quantal response is measured (see Figure 9.1). However, it should be... 

---