Push factors

Your personal power is in practice, as already noted, the result of both push and pull factors. The push factors are the problems that you want to solve, that are making the present state of affairs unsatisfactory and make you want to Improve things. The pull factors are to do with your vision of the future, which you may hold quite independently of any problems that are making the present uncomfortable. 

At the same time there are two major push factors at influence in the Highlands. The first is the move to increase the biodiversity of the area and to move away from extensive plantations of single species conifers of alien species. This is occurring through the regeneration of the traditional mixed native woodlands of Scots pine, (Pinus sylvestris), birch, (Betula alba and pendula) and other native trees and an under story of species such as juniper (Juniper communis), wild cranberries, (Vaccinium macrocarpa) and blaeberries, (Vaccinium myrtillus). 

Economic activity rates were static and had fallen for older men. Many of those who lost jobs in the waves of restructuring that took place in manufacturing and other sectors moved on to sickness and disability benefits, contributing to what was described as hidden unemployment (Alcock et al. 2003). A number of push and pull factors were identified. Push factors included the collapse in demand for unskilled labour, the role of the activation regime and the relative laxity of medical and eligibility tests. Pull factors included the relative generosity of invalidity compared with unemployment benefits (Clasen et al. 2004). Other factors were also at work, especially an increase in qualifying mental health conditions. 

Provided that push factors create pressure on an organization or the organization creates extra space via pull factors, it is important for necessary systematic changes to be applied. 

In recent years, however, the MNCs are returning to Africa and are focusing more on the subcontinent. Both push and pull factors are in operation. The most important push factor is that developed country markets have become less attractive, and the main pull factor is the... 

In addition to the push factors that compel students to reconsider their commitment to engineering, there are pull factors drawing students into other majors. Faculty, administrators, and staff understand that not all students maintain interest in engineering. For some, their natural interests were different. An administrator gives an example of a switcher who is now becoming an actor and he was in my class and we talked and it just turned out that this is not where he wanted to be but he wasn t going to tell anybody because his parents would be disappointed (USF administrator). 

Other factors also impact the type of crystals formed upon cooling of hot soap. Water activity or moisture content contribute to the final crystal state as a result of the different phases containing different levels of hydration. Any additive that changes the water activity changes the crystallization pathway. For example, the addition of salt reduces the water activity of the mixture and pushes the equiUbrium state toward the lower moisture crystal stmcture. Additionally, the replacement of sodium with other counter cations influences the crystallization. For example, the replacement of sodium with potassium drives toward the formation of 5-phase. 

Airborne contaminant movement in the building depends upon the type of heat and contaminant sources, which can be classified as (1) buoyant (e.g., heat) sources, (2) nonbuoyant (diffusion) sources, and (d) dynamic sources.- With the first type of sources, contaminants move in the space primarily due to the heat energy as buoyant plumes over the heated surfaces. The second type of sources is characterized by cimtaminant diffusion in the room in all directions due to the concentration gradient in all directions (e.g., in the case of emission from painted surfaces). The emission rare in this case is significantly affected by the intensity of the ambient air turbulence and air velocity, dhe third type of sources is characterized by contaminant movement in the space with an air jet (e.g., linear jet over the tank with a push-pull ventilation), or particle flow (e.g., from a grinding wheel). In some cases, the above factors influencing contaminant distribution in the room are combined. 

The ACGIH " gives recommendations for the design of a push-pull system, apparently based largely on the work of NIOSH in the 1980s the nozzle should be between 3.2 mm and 6.4 mm and that the so-called momentum factor of the jet, the product of its velocity and flow rate per unit width, U,ij should be between 0.39 and 0.59 m s -. The outlet flow rate may then be calculated using the formula... 

In designing the push-pull hood, one always applies a safety factor, , resulting in the exhaust flow rate for design, which is expressed as the following ... 

For practical design, the recommended aspects of the push-pull flow (hood) and the safety factor are as follows ... 

If the kinetic theory is applicable to gases, we should expect pressure to be affected by other factors than the number of moles per unit volume. For example, the mass of the molecules and their velocities should be important, as well. After all, a baseball exerts more push on a catcher s mitt than would a ping-pong ball thrown with the same velocity. Also, a baseball exerts more push on the mitt if a fast ball is thrown rather than a slow ball. To see how the mass of the molecules and their velocities are dealt with in the kinetic theory, we must consider temperature. 

Whether this tendency of PLS to reject nonlinearities by pushing them onto the later factors which are usually discarded as noise factors will improve or degrade the prediction accuracy and robustness of a PLS calibration as compared to the same calibration generated by PCR depends very much upon the specifics of the data and the application. If the nonlinearities are poorly correlated to the properties which we are trying to predict, rejecting them can improve the accuracy. On the other hand, if the rejected nonlinearities contain information that has predictive value, then the PLS calibration may not perform as well as the corresponding PCR calibration that retains more of the nonlinearities and therefore is able to exploit the information they contain. In short, the only sure way to determine if PLS or PCR is better for a given calibration is to try both of them and compare the results. 

---