Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Purity values

Purity values for lithium are usually calculated on the basis of metallic impurities, with only chloride being quoted for nonmetallic impurities. Typical analyses are shown in Table 1. [Pg.324]

The effects of Tr on benzene product purity and product yields over various dual-bed catalyst systems with different bottom bed catalyst ratios are shown in Fig. 2. As shown in Fig. 2a, over the single-bed Pt/Z12 catalyst alone (i.e., y = 0), a drastic increase in benzene purity with increasing Tr was observed, for example, the benzene purity value increased from 10.87% to 98.36% as Tr increased from 553 K to 683 K. However, upon... [Pg.431]

Reagent Purity The purity of many reagents is specified by the manufacturer as being not less than a specified value. Any assumptions about the degree of purity will contribute to the uncertainty. The nature of any impurities may also be important. Pure substance Certified Reference Materials will have a stated purity, plus an estimate of the uncertainty associated with the purity value. [Pg.164]

The purities in mass%, declared by worldwide commercial suppliers, range from 99.9% for alkaline-earth metals and rare earths metals, to 99.999% for Al, Cr, Mn, Fe. .., to 99.9999 for Au, Ag, Pt. In certain cases, these values can be misleading since they refer to the metal contents, disregarding the non-metallic impurities contents (interstitial H, C, N, O, etc.). Moreover, the concentration is expressed in mass% and, for low atomic mass impurities, such as H or O, this can result in a much lower at.% purity value. The elements for special use, such as for spectrog-raphy, may require very high purities, which can be attained only by specialized laboratories. [Pg.560]

In the mass balance approach, all impurities are quantified and subtracted from the absolute value of 100%. This approach will result in a purity value that, if all impurities are accounted for, is more accurate than the external or internal standard methods. However, the ability to identify all impurities in a given drug substance may require the use of hyphenated detection techniques and could be extremely costly to complete on a regular basis. Therefore, a related approach, called Area Normalization, is often used where the majority of the impurities can be identified and quantified in a single chromatogram. In the simplest case, all of the impurities would be assumed to have the same relative response... [Pg.372]

It was found that production grade TeNCbz gave purity values which were consistently slightly in excess of 100%(such as 100.15%). [Pg.445]

An example of the use of a reference material as an intermediate point in this traceability mechanism is the reference material DMR-160a (CENAM identification), sodium chloride, with its purity value assigned. This reference material is intended to be applied by field laboratories in chloride measurement, silver titration, and in all those analytical methods which require NaCl with a specific purity value. In Fig. 2 a complete trace-ability chain is shown by the use of reference materials to the SI units. [Pg.241]

The purity value of this salt is assigned by a coulo-metric method, which is one of the potentially primary methods for amount of substance determination, according to the CCQM. The principle of this method is as follows given an analyte dissolved in a solution, both the solution and the analyte contained in an electrochemical cell, the amount of electrical charge required to perform a chemical reaction in which the analyte of interest can be converted in another compound, is directly proportional to the amount of substance of this analyte. [Pg.241]

The previous section assumed that product composition (or product flow) requirements are fixed. In this very common situation, the optimum design minimizes the costs of achieving these requirements. Often, product specs are not fixed, but depend on economics. Even when a product must obey a "less than" purity spec, better purity may fetch a better price. The better price may justify additional investment in equipment and/or a higher operating cost. Here, a design must optimize product purity value versus distillation cost. This optimization is also important in an operating column and is commonly performed by on-line computer control. It is outlined below, and discussed in detail elsewhere (1,2). [Pg.90]

The calculated equivalent weight of aminomethanesul-fonic acid is 111.1. For the crude material, purity = 98 + %. For the recrystallized material, purity values of 99.9 to 100.2% have been consistently obtained. [Pg.123]

The specificity of the method was checked with a peak purity test of the assay preparation performed with a photodiode array detector. The peak purity values for metformin and glibenclamide were observed to be 995 and 999, respectively. The results of the peak purity analysis show that the peaks of the analytes were pure and that the formulation excipients did not interfere with the analyte peaks. [Pg.991]

It is therefore necessary to evaluate impurities utilizing a variety of techniques and instruments, prior to assigning purity values to the drug substance. [Pg.29]

A consistent, scientifically defensible process is followed when purity values are assigned. A clear rationale for the calculation of purity values as well as clear instructions on the use of purity values must also be included. [Pg.126]

The essential aspects have been discussed in the introduction on the use of RMs and CRMs. It should be noted that inorganic CRMs, in particular pure metals, are available on the market from several reliable suppliers. They show usually purity values with associated uncertainties that are negligible compared to the uncertainty of the majority of spectrometric methods in which they serve as calibrants. It is usual to find materials of stated (not by definition certified) purity of 99.999% (five nines in analytical jargon) or better. This would mean that any impurity is below 0.001% as a mass fraction. No relative analytical method has precision performances that go down to such levels. Suppliers of ultra pure metals are numerous. NIST sells such metals as certified RMs (SRMs). The certification of the purity is discussed briefly in Chapter 5. It can be mentioned that the measurements are often based on absolute methods. The ultimate detection of impurities can be made with spark source MS. For pure metals the uncertainty linked to the calculated purity is small. Therefore, compared to the intended use and the uncertainty of classical methods applied by the analyst for the determination of elements, it is totally negligible. [Pg.74]

T90 = time taken for the compound to degrade to 90% of its initial purity value. [Pg.291]

Accuracy in the purity value for high-purity substances io- % + 5 x 10 2%... [Pg.653]

Palermo and Chiu (57) recommended sample sizes from 2-4 mg 5 mg sample sizes result in thermal equilibrium not being maintained. Heating rates should be less than l°C/mm faster heating rates, up to lO°C/min, have been used for qualitative comparison, unstable compounds, or extremely broad melting peaks. If thermal equilibrium is maintained and a solid solution is not formed, curvature of the 7 versus 1 F plot may result from the insensitivity of the instrument to detect early melting. To remove this curvature, a constant is added to the fractional and total areas until linear plots are obtained. This may be accomplished either manually or with a computer. The most common limits for 1 fF in the linearization procedure are 10-50% of the melt. If too little of the curve is used, the purity value will be too high and if too much is used, the purity value will be too low. [Pg.663]

Table 10.5. Comparison of GC Assay and DSC purity Values for Some Zone-refined... Table 10.5. Comparison of GC Assay and DSC purity Values for Some Zone-refined...
In view of its rapidity, use of milligram quantities of samples, and application to the purity region from 98.0-99.95 mole-% DSC is a most valuable tool for characterization of organic compounds (41). For a thermally stable compound, a low-purity value, based on a satisfactory run of the instrument, is... [Pg.666]

Maniara etal. [197] made a systematic exploration of experimental precision, accuracy, specificity, linearity, DL, QL, and robusmess, for NMR assays of agricultural chemicals. They concluded that carefully implemented QNMR can compete effectively widi chromatographic methods. The level of the major chemical ingredient can be determined with accuracy and precision significantly better than 1%. Impurities at the 0.1% or lower may also be quantified . For the robustness study, these workers chose the number of scans and the relaxation delay, then operator to operator and instrument to instrument variabihties were tested. Unlike Bauer etal., they found that purity values were Not significantly dependent on analyst or instrument , but perhaps this was because the work was performed in one laboratory, rather than several disparate laboratories, each of which may have their own way of working. The work of Maniara etal. therefore tested intermediate precision, whereas that of Bauer etal. tested reproducibility. [Pg.146]

Solid-phase scavenger methods are employed with increasing frequency as a prehminary reaction cleanup step in combinatorial chemistry, and have recently become commercially available (Argonaut, Calbiochem-Novabiochem, Varian, Alltech). lilly researchers first reported on this approach, employing sohd supported electrophiles and nucleophiles for reaction purification in acylation and alkylation reactions. Yield and purity values reported were 90-95% and 50-99%, respectively, for a library generated by reductive amination. Parke-Davis researchers achieved the removal of known reaction product impurities by the application of custom synthesized polymer supported reagents, specifically polystyrene-divinylbenzene supported derivatives of methylisocyanate and tm(2-aminomethyl)amine for cleanup of by-products resulting from urea, thiourea,sulfonamide,amide, and pyrazole libraries. [Pg.282]

Monoethanolamine (>99%), N-methyldiethanolamine (>99%), diethanolamine (>99%) and piperazine (=99%) were all purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Amines are used based on the given purity values by the supplier. CO2 (>99.5%) and N2 (>99%) were used to simulate the flue gas. [Pg.60]

Standards for many organotins are available from commercial suppliers with chemical purities of typically 95% or better, however, limited uncertainty information is generally available on these purity values. Care should be taken in the choice of solvent and container which standards are prepared in to minimize any absorption onto the walls. Stock solutions are typically prepared in methanol and refrigerated. Working-level solutions are often prepared regularly, even daily. [Pg.4846]


See other pages where Purity values is mentioned: [Pg.212]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.842]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.2682]    [Pg.2838]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.297]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.257 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info