Publisher names author

It is recognized that, of the hundreds of reports involving silenes published even in the last ten years, not every one has been mentioned in this review. The authors selected those publications that appeared to be the most significant or interesting. If any publications have been misinterpreted in the review the authors regret the error the responsibility lies fully with the first-named author. 

The Appeal Board has a dual role, acting over the activities of the Code of Practice Panel and the PMCPA as both an appeal body and as a supervisory body. All complaints received by the Authority and all rulings by the Code of Practice Panel are reported to the Appeal Board, thus ensuring independent scrutiny from outside the pharmaceutical industry of both the authority s and the panel s activities by the independent members and independent chairman of the Appeal Board. Where promotional material or activities are ruled in breach of the Code, the company concerned must cease to use the material or cease the activity in question forthwith and provide a written undertaking to that effect. Reports on all cases under the Code of Practice are also published, naming companies ruled in breach of the code. These reports receive wide coverage, particularly in the pharmaceutical press and occasionally find their way into the lay press. 

To the best of our knowledge the information in this publication is accurate however the Publisher and author do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of, or consequences arising from, such information. This book is intended for informational purposes only. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Publisher. Final determination of the suitability of any information or product for use contemplated by any user, and the manner of that use, is the sole responsibility of the user. We recommend that anyone intending to rely on any recommendation of materials or procedures mentioned in this publication should satisfy himself as to such suitability, and that he can meet all applicable safety and health standards. 

An exact reference to each source, together with the authors names, is cited at the respective Table or Figure. I sincerely thank the publishers and authors of the cited communications. 

A few frequently cited values of PZCs/IEPs have actually never been published. Namely, they have been cited after secondary sources, without checking the primary source, which reports different PZCs/IEPs than that in a secondary source, a result of limited significance, or no PZCs/IEPs at all. Reference [2469] is quoted in [1] and then by a few other authors (probably after [1]) as an authoritative source of the IEP of hematite. Actually, no specific IEP is reported in [2469]. The authors mention that pH 2.4-4.2 is far from the IEP, but they do not specify how far. 

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. 

Available for manual searching are abstracts that typically provide the name of the autlior, a brief abstract of the article, the title of the article, and identify where the article was published. Alphabetical author and subject indexes are usually provided, and an identifying number is assigned to refer to the abstract. Many abstracts are published monthly or more frequently. Annual cumulations are available in many cases. A comprehensive listing of abstracts and indexes can be found in Ulrich s International Periodical Directory (annual from R. R. Bowker, New York). 

C. Read the book and prepare a review in which you do the following a) dte your book (e.g., name, author, publisher, date), b) describe some of the key ideas and/ or theses presented in the book, c) identify the evidence in support of the ideas/ theses, and d) indicate whether or not you agree with the key ideas/theses. Refer to Chapter 3 of this book for writing guidance. 

From 1871 until the formation of British Abstracts in 1926 it published abstracts from other journals on pure and theoretical chemistry, indicated in the collective indexes by an A after the author s name. For many years two volumes of abstracts were published annually. Author and subject indexes are available. About half of its contents today refer to organic chemistry, the rest being divided between physical and inorganic. News and activities of the Society which were for many years included in the Journal have been published separately since 1957 as the Proceedings of the Chemical Society. 

TRACES (1968) Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science (TRACES). Illinois Institute of Technology, Research Institute published for the National Science Foundation (no editor or author named). 

The inspection authority for a document is the person who approved it. There may be other personnel in the chain such as the issuing authority or the publishing authority, but the person who verified the content is normally the approval authority. With documents that carry signatures you have less protection from prying users and so here is a good reason for excluding the name of the author or approver from the finished document if it is to be used externally. Separate document development records can be used to trace authors and approvers to specific documents. 

On the basis of the luciferin-luciferase reaction discovered by Dubois (1887), Michelson, Henry and their associates studied the biochemistry of the Pholas bioluminescence for several years beginning in 1970 (Michelson, 1978). They isolated, purified, and characterized the luciferin and the luciferase, and published about a dozen papers in which the luciferin isolated was referred to as Pholas luciferin. Since the luciferin is clearly a protein, later authors called it pholasin following the traditional way of naming a photoprotein... 

Patents or trademarks may cover information presented. No authorization to utilize these patents or trademarks is given or implied they are discussed for information purposes only. The use of general descriptive names, proprietary names, trade names, commercial designations, or the like does not in any way imply that they may be used freely. While information presented represents useful information that can be studied or analyzed and is believed to be true and accurate, neither the authors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or other factors. 

With the publication of Vol. 51 we should also like to refer to editorial policy this series publishes invited, critical review articles of new developments in all areas of Polymer Science in English (authors may naturally also include works of their own). The responsible editor, that means the editor who has invited the article, discusses the scope of the review with the author on the basis of a tentative outline which the author is asked to provide. Author and editor are responsible for the scientific quality of the contribution the editor s name appears at the end of it. Manuscripts must be submitted, in content, language and form satisfactory, to Springer-Verlag. Figures and formulas should be reproducible. To meet readers wishes, the publisher adds to each volume a volume index which approximately characterizes the content. 

The heat of dissociation in hexane solution of lithium polyisoprene, erroneously assumed to be dimeric, was reported in a 1984 review 71) to be 154.7 KJ/mole. This value, taken from the paperl05> published in 1964 by one of its authors, was based on a viscometric study. The reported viscometric data were shown i06) to yield greatly divergent AH values, depending on what value of a, the exponent relating the viscosity p of a concentrated polymer solution to DPW of the polymer (q DP ), is used in calculation. As shown by a recent compilation 1071 the experimental a values vary from 3.3 to 3.5, and another recent paper 108) reports its variation from 3.14 to 4. Even a minute variation of oe results in an enormous change of the computed AH, namely from 104.5 KJ/mole for oe = 3.38 to 209 KJ/mole for oe = 3.42. Hence, the AH = 154.7 KJ/mole, computed for a = 3.40, is meaningless. For the same reasons the value of 99.5 KJ/mole for the dissociation of the dimeric lithium polystyrene reported in the same review and obtained by the viscometric procedure is without foundation. 

This list contains the titles of papers that carry M. Stacey s name as author. It does not include those published independently by his colleagues in the University of Birmingham laboratories. 

Besides subject terms, the CA File also contains bibliographical information, such as author names, location of the laboratory in which the work was done, language of the paper, and so on, and these can be searched. For example, S ROBERTS, J7/AU will find all papers published by any authors named Roberts whose first name begins with J. These terms can be combined with subject terms in Boolean searches. 

---