Proton solvation shell

The mode of extraction in these oxonium systems may be illustrated by considering the ether extraction of iron(III) from strong hydrochloric acid solution. In the aqueous phase chloride ions replace the water molecules coordinated to the Fe3+ ion, yielding the tetrahedral FeCl ion. It is recognised that the hydrated hydronium ion, H30 + (H20)3 or HgO,, normally pairs with the complex halo-anions, but in the presence of the organic solvent, solvent molecules enter the aqueous phase and compete with water for positions in the solvation shell of the proton. On this basis the primary species extracted into the ether (R20) phase is considered to be [H30(R20)3, FeCl ] although aggregation of this species may occur in solvents of low dielectric constant. 

Other studies conducted on mixed protonated clusters of ammonia bound with TMA showed that the ion intensity distributions of (NH3)n(TMA)mH+191 display local maxima at (n,m) = (1,4), (2,3), (2,6), (3,2), and (3,8). Observation that the maximum ion intensity occurs at (n,m) = (1,4), (2,3), and (3,2) indicates that a solvation shell is formed around the NHJ ion with four ligands of any combination of ammonia and TMA molecules. In the situation where the maximum of the ion intensity occurs at (n,m) = (2,6) and (3,8), the experimental results suggest that another solvation shell forms which contains the core ions [H3N-H-NH3]+ (with six available hydrogen-bonding sites) and [H3N-H(NH2)H-NH3]+ (with eight available hydrogen-bonding sites). The observed metastable unimolecular decomposition processes support the above solvation model. 

Experiments made at higher degrees of aggregation have provided strong evidence192 for ring-like structures for mixed neutral clusters. For example, under a wide variety of experimental conditions, mixed cluster ions display a maximum intensity atm = 2(n + 1) whenn<5 for (NH3)II (M)mH+, andm = n + 2 whenn<4 for (H20)B(M)mH+ M is a proton acceptor such as acetone, pyridine, and trimethy-lamine. These findings reveal that the cluster ions with these compositions have stable solvation shell structures as discussed above. 

This shows that the second and further solvation shells still have a non-negligible effect on NMR chemical shielding constants through the long-range electrical field they create. The approximation of an isolated molecular cluster in vacuo is valid for large clusters only this eventually makes determination of the shieldings of all protons computationally much more expensive than the fully periodic ab initio calculation. 

There is no quantitative model yet describing the observed electro-osmotic drag coefficients as a function of the degree of hydration and temperature. However, the available data provide strong evidence for a mechanism that is (i) hydrodynamic in the high solvation limit, with the dimensions of the solvated hydrophilic domain and the solvent—polymer interaction as the major parameters and (ii) diffusive at low degrees of solvation, where the excess proton essentially drags its primary solvation shell (e.g., H3O+). 

Terms for the electrostatic interactions [Eq. (2.13)] for the region outside the first solvation shell, and an appropriate one for the inner region, must be added to Eq. (2.12) for each ion of an electrolyte B, for the evaluation of AsoIyGb. Since cations do not accept hydrogen bonds and anions do not donate them, except when protonated, like HSOi, the term in a of the solvent becomes unimportant for cations and that in P of the solvent for anions. 

A primary hydration number of 6 for Fe + in aqueous (or D2O) solution has been indicated by neutron diffraction with isotopic substitution (NDIS), XRD, 16,1017 EXAFS, and for Fe " " by NDIS and EXAFS. Fe—O bond distances in aqueous solution have been determined, since 1984, for Fe(H20)/+ by EXAFS and neutron diffraction, for ternary Fe " "-aqua-anion species by XRD (in sulfate and in chloride media, and in bromide media ), for Fe(H20)g by neutron diffraction, and for ternary Fe -aqua-anion species. The NDIS studies hint at the second solvation shell in D2O solution high energy-resolution incoherent quasi-elastic neutron scattering (IQENS) can give some idea of the half-lives of water-protons in the secondary hydration shell of ions such as Fe aq. This is believed to be less than 5 X I0 s, whereas t>5x10 s for the binding time of protons in the primary hydration shell. X-Ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS—EXAFS and XANES) has been used... 

Ionization of DNA s solvation shell produces water radical cations (H20 ) and fast electrons. The fate of the hole is dictated by two competing reactions hole transfer to DNA and formation of HO via proton transfer. If the ionized water is in direct contact with the DNA (F < 10), hole transfer dominates. If the ionized water is in the next layer out (9 < r < 22), HO formation dominates [67,89,90]. The thermalized excess electrons attach preferentially to bases, regardless of their origin. Thus the yield of one-electron reduced bases per DNA mass increases in lockstep with increasing F, up to an F of 20-25. This means that when F exceeds 9, there will be an imbalance between holes and electrons trapped on DNA, the balance of the holes being trapped as HO . At F = 17, an example where the water and DNA masses are about equal, the solvation shell doubles the number of electron adducts, increasing the DNA-centered holes by a bit over 50% [91-93]. 

HOO" and RO" are not necessarily adjacent to each other in the intermediate ion triplet. Thus, the solvation shell of 1-octanol could help transfer the proton. 

All of this suggests that the ion association explanation may be applied here to an essentially bimolecular (or associative) phenomenon. Considering the difference between hydroxide and any other reagent in water, apart from its basicity, one concludes that its mobility must play an important part. Whereas all the other reagents must be in a suitable position within the solvation shell before they can enter the complex, the hydroxide ion, by means of a Grotthus chain proton transfer, can be transmitted to any position where it is needed while the complex becomes activated. It can therefore be looked upon as an unsaturatable ion aggregate with hydroxide fully delocalized about the complex. Consequently, we do not observe any departure from the first-order dependence upon hydroxide concentration. This contribution to the reactivity will appear in the activation entropy rather than in the enthalpy term. 

Very similar results are obtained with ethanol-water mixtures109. Presumably the ester can only be protonated if some minimum number of water molecules is available to solvate it, and a point is reached where the minimum water content of the immediate solvation shell of the protonated ester is greater than that of the medium as a whole. Beyond this point, which apparently corresponds quite closely to an average solvent composition of two water molecules to one of dioxan, this minimum water content must be acquired at the expense of the solvent at large, and thus of a slightly less favourable entropy term however, the enthalpy of activation should remain approximately constant as long as there is sufficient water in the solvent for this selective solvation110 to be possible. 

By analogy with [17] the C60n" anion radicals, which are generated on the cathode under the action of voltage, can reduce the toluene molecules present in the solvate shell. On the other hand, with protons in the medium, protonization of the Cm/1 anion radicals, which are electrogenerated on the cathode, to hydrofullerenes can proceed in the following reaction... 

The kinetics of the ionic equilibration is also dependent on the analyte solvation. The greater the analyte solvation, the slower the equilibration kinetics. Solvation shell restricts the protonation or deprotonation of the analyte. Solvation is also influenced by the eluent ionic strength. With an increase of the concentration of ions in the analyte microenvironment, there is a corresponding decrease in the analyte solvation, thus increasing the ionic equilibration kinetics. The increase of the eluent ionic strength usually improves the analyte peak shape even if the mobile-phase pH is close to the analyte Ka. 

---