Proton acidity definition

It is not only in the field of kinetic relations that discrepancies exist. When the catalyst is a protonic acid and the reaction is carried out in dilute solution, the mechanisms describing the contribution of the catalyst are relatively well-known. But in most other cases and particularly when the catalyst is a metal derivative (see Chap. 4) none of the proposed mechanisms can be considered as definitive. 

Since Arrhenius, definitions have extended the scope of what we mean by acids and bases. These theories include the proton transfer definition of Bronsted-Lowry (Bronsted, 1923 Lowry, 1923a,b), the solvent system concept (Day Selbin, 1969), the Lux-Flood theory for oxide melts, the electron pair donor and acceptor definition of Lewis (1923, 1938) and the broad theory of Usanovich (1939). These theories are described in more detail below. 

The Arrhenius definition is not suitable for AB cements for several reasons. It cannot be applied to zinc oxide eugenol cements, for these are non-aqueous, nor to the metal oxychloride and oxysulphate cements, where the acid component is not a protonic acid. Indeed, the theory is, strictly speaking, not applicable at all to AB cements where the base is not a water-soluble hydroxide but either an insoluble oxide or a silicate. 

Although Lewis and Bronsted bases comprise the same species, the same is not true of their acids. Lewis acids include bare metal cations, while Bronsted-Lowry acids do not. Also, Bell (1973) and Day Selbin (1969) have pointed out that Bronsted or protonic acids fit awkwardly into the Lewis definition. Protonic acids cannot accept an electron pair as is required in the Lewis definition, and a typical Lewis protonic add appears to be an adduct between a base and the add (Luder, 1940 Kolthoff, 1944). Thus, a protonic acid can only be regarded as a Lewis add in the sense that its reaction with a base involves the transient formation of an unstable hydrogen bond adduct. For this reason, advocates of the Lewis theory have sometimes termed protonic adds secondary acids (Bell, 1973). This is an unfortunate term for the traditional adds. 

The Lewis definition covers all AB cements, including the metal oxide/metal oxysalt systems, because the theory recognizes bare cations as aprotic acids. It is also particularly appropriate to the chelate cements, where it is more natural to regard the product of the reaction as a coordination complex rather than a salt. Its disadvantages are that the definition is really too broad and that despite this it accommodates protonic acids only with difficulty. 

It is better than the Lewis theory for describing acid-base cements, for it avoids the awkwardness that the Lewis definition has with protonic acids. However, as Day Selbin (1969) have observed, the generality of the theory is such that it includes nearly all chemical reactions, so that acid-base reactions could simply be termed chemical reactions . 

The Lewis acids that also fulfil the Br0nsted definition form a special group of protonic acids and can be formally considered to be the products of neutralization of a proton by a base (for example Cl"). 

But. wlial is an acid Earlier, the acidic traits were used to define an acid. But with the modem understanding of the atom, a different definition is used. You will remember thaL the nucleus of an atom contains positively charged protons. Acids in solution liberate protons as ions (H ). And so we say that an acid is a substance that will give up — or "donate — protons to another substance. Acids are proton donors. The foremost acids used in industry are sulfuric acid (HjSOJ, nitric acid (HNOa), and hydrochloric acid (HC1). 

According to the Lewis definition, an acid is an electron pair acceptor and a base is an electron pair donor. All Bronsted-Lowry bases are also Lewis bases. However, Lewis acids include many species that are not proton acids instead of H+, they have some other electron-deficient species that acts as the electron pair acceptor. An example of a Lewis acid-base reaction is provided by the following equation. In this reaction the boron of BF3 is electron/deficient (it has only six electrons in its valence shell). The oxygen of the ether is a Lewis base and uses a pair of electrons to form a bond to the boron, thus completing boron s octet. 

In 1923, Brpnsted and Lowry defined acids and bases on the basis of the transfer of protons. A Brpnsted-Lowry acid is any species that can donate a proton, and a Brpnsted-Lowry base is any species that can accept a proton. These definitions also include all the Arrhenius acids and bases because compounds that dissociate to give H30+ are proton donors, and compounds that dissociate to give OH are proton acceptors. (Hydroxide ion accepts a proton to form H20.)... 

This section will use gas-phase thermochemical data from Appendices 6 for molecules and 7 for radicals. These data include ionization energy (IE), electron affinity (EA), proton affinity (PA), gas-phase basicity (GB) and gas-phase acidity. Definitions of these parameters are given in Table 1.5. Some values of gas-phase basicities are given in Table 1.6. 

Although the pKa or H0 values for several acids are known [10,11], the definition of strong acid is somewhat arbitrary, because the position of equilibrium (13) depends on the basicity of heterocyclic monomer. Because this basicity varies from rather low (e.g., cyclic acetals) to rather high (e.g., cyclic amines) no universal rule describing the behavior of particular protonic acids in ring-opening polymerization exists. 

These salts are most efficient in the polymerization of cyclic monomers [33, 34] though some use in vinyl systems has been reported [34]. Protonic acids, e.g., HCIO4 (and H2SO4) also fall within the definition of pre-formed initiators. As already indicated a considerable amount of work has been carried out on the polymerization of styrene [10—22] by these acids, where an additional question concerning the role of covalent perchlorate ester species is raised. This problem is dealt with in more detail later (see Section 6.2). 

And so, indeed, is any species with an outer electron structure capable of expansion. Most proton acids conform to the Lewis definition if the reaction between base and acid is considered to start with a hydrogen bond, XH... B. In this way an electron may be said to be accepted by the acid HX. Experimentally, Lewis classes as acids substances exhibiting the typical acidic properties (a) catalytic action, (b) abihty to neutralise bases, (c) effect on indicators, (d) displacement by a stronger acid. 

In Chapter 4 we defined a Brpnsted acid as a snbstance capable of donating a proton, and a Brpnsted base as a substance that can accept a proton. These definitions are generally suitable for a discussion of the properties and reactions of acids and bases. 

According to this equation, both the definitions considered above concerning proton acidity are merely particular cases of the Lewis definition. Indeed, a proton is an electron-deficient particle and an acceptor of an electron pair, hence it is referred to as an acid and its acceptors are bases. 

The same authors have briefly reported (84) neutron-diffraction work on the hexahydrate of anthranilic acid. From our point of view, the important finding is a discrete H5O2 ion, with 0 0=2.44 A, but without special crystallographic symmetry the proton is definitively located 0.05 A from the bond-centre. The hydrates of hydrogen chloride, HCl. 2 H2O and HCl. 3 H2O (85) also contain ions without special symmetry, though both hydrogen bonds are very short (2.414(7) and 2.43(1) A). 

The Danish physical chemist Johannes Nicolaus Br iinsted (1874-1947) defined an acid as a substance which can donate a proton to another molecule. Similarly, he defined a base as a substance which can accept a proton. These definitions have proved to be very useful, particularly for the aqueous solutions with which we are mainly concerned. For nonaqueous systems it is preferable to use a more general definition, first proposed by G. N. Lewis, according to which an acid is a substance which can accept electrons, and a base is a substance which can donate electrons. Here we shall employ the Br nsted definition, which is somewhat more convenient for aqueous solutions. 

Equivalence Point Reference Species Proton Condition Definition (Alkalinity and Acidity in eq/liter)... 

We ll come back to a more formal definition of later, but first we need to look more closely at this pair of species—the protonated acid and its deprotonated, basic partner. 

HX-f H20=F H30 -fX-The ion HaO is the oxonium ion (or hy-droxonium ion or hydronium ion). This definition of acids comes from the Arrhenius theory. Such acids tend to be corrosive substances with a sharp taste, which turn litmus red and give colour changes with other indicators. They are referred to as protonic acids and are classified into strong acids, which are almost completely dissociated in water (e.g. sulphuric acid and hydrochloric acid), and weak acids, which are only partially dissociated (e.g. ethanoic acid and hydrogen sulphide). The strength of an acid depends on the extent to which it dissociates, and is measured by its dissociation constant. See also base. 

Systems defined by the Arrhenius description, solvent system, Lux-Flood and proton acid-base definitions... 

In 1923 Bronsted [2] and Lowry [3] independently generalized these definitions and emphasized the crucial role of protons. Acids were defined as substances able to donate protons and bases as substances able to accept protons. Water was no longer required as a solvent, and bases no longer needed to donate hydroxyls. 

All results apply to 1 F N(CHj)jCl and 20° unless otherwise stated. The titration of methanolic hydrochloric acid with lithiummethylate shows the expected Nernst relation between potential of the hydrogen electrode and total concentrations of H in all pertinent forms and that of methylate, respectively pK = -log [Htl tOR ] 16,60 pK 16,05, 1 F LiCl. This permits the definition of pH-scales based on molar concentrations. The titration curves or proton acids like acetic acid (pK = 8,9 ), acetylacetone (pK a 11,8), ammoniumion (pK = 11,2), oxalic acid (pKj = 8,4, pK = 5,lj) and pyrocatechol (pK 15,4, pK = 13,2) were as expected and permitted to check the measuring techniques. 

The term acid is often used nowadays in a different sense, as first proposed by G. N. Lewis. There has been much controversy, sometimes immoderate in tone, about the relative merits of the Bronsted and Lowry definitions of acids. The question is essentially one of the convenience and consistency of verbal definitions, and not of any fundamental differences in the interpretation of experimental facts moreover, since the present book is about the proton in chemistry we shall have little occasion to mention non-protonic acids. However, a few comments seem desirable at this point. 

---