Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Proteins to protein interactions

Additional characterization of the two major soluble starch synthases in maize endosperm indicated distinct catalytic properties.402 Soluble starch synthase II has been reported to be encoded by the du gene.397 the initially observed reduction in BEIIa is a secondary effect and may be related to protein-to-protein interactions. [Pg.58]

Most proteins bind the detergent SDS to negatively loaded SDS protein complexes with a constant charge-to-mass ratio (1.4 g SDS/g protein in 1% SDS solutions). SDS denatures the proteins—especially after previous reduction with mercaptoethanole or DTT—and prevents protein-to-protein interactions (quarternary structmes). For the purposes of many measuring methods, the SDS-protein complexes of different proteins thus differ only in their size and have comparable hydrodynamic qualities. [Pg.5]

Flavin reductases having a diffusible fiavin can be also be grouped with what is referred to as class I enzymes, exemplified by the Fre NADPH flavin reductase ofE. coli (81). Flavin reduction in class I enzymes follows a sequential, ordered mechanism in which NADPH binds to the enzyme followed by flavin, which is then reduced and released (82). This type of diffusible mechanism implies that reduced flavin is supplied to the desulfurization monooxygenases (DszC and A) without the need for protein-to-protein interaction with the reductase (DszD). It is thus not surprising that reduced flavin can be provided to the monoo genases by a variety of reductases, as demonstrated by Lei and Tu (83) and others (84). [Pg.440]

A number of issues need to be addressed before this method will become a routine tool applicable to problems as the conformational equilibrium of protein kinase. E.g. the accuracy of the force field, especially the combination of Poisson-Boltzmann forces and molecular mechanics force field, remains to be assessed. The energy surface for the opening of the two kinase domains in Pig. 2 indicates that intramolecular noncovalent energies are overestimated compared to the interaction with solvent. [Pg.75]

Ligand-Protein Interactions The energy of formation of ligand-protein contacts can be computed as a sum of non-bonded (Lennard-Jones and electrostatic) terms similar to those used in a molecular dynamics simulation. [Pg.131]

In dye-binding tests, milk is mixed with excess acidic dye solution where the protein binds the dye in a constant ratio and forms a precipitate. After the dye—protein interaction takes place, the mixture is centrifuged and the optical density of the supernatant is determined. Utilization of the dye is thus measured and from it the protein content determined. Several methods for appHcation of dye-binding techniques to milk are given (24,25). [Pg.364]

To date, a number of simulation studies have been performed on nucleic acids and proteins using both AMBER and CHARMM. A direct comparison of crystal simulations of bovine pancreatic trypsin inliibitor show that the two force fields behave similarly, although differences in solvent-protein interactions are evident [24]. Side-by-side tests have also been performed on a DNA duplex, showing both force fields to be in reasonable agreement with experiment although significant, and different, problems were evident in both cases [25]. It should be noted that as of the writing of this chapter revised versions of both the AMBER and CHARMM nucleic acid force fields had become available. Several simulations of membranes have been performed with the CHARMM force field for both saturated [26] and unsaturated [27] lipids. The availability of both protein and nucleic acid parameters in AMBER and CHARMM allows for protein-nucleic acid complexes to be studied with both force fields (see Chapter 20), whereas protein-lipid (see Chapter 21) and DNA-lipid simulations can also be performed with CHARMM. [Pg.13]

In spite of the absence of the C-terminal domains, the DNA-binding domains of lambda repressor form dimers in the crystals, as a result of interactions between the C-terminal helix number 5 of the two subunits that are somewhat analogous to the interactions of the C-terminal p strand 3 in the Cro protein (Figure 8.7). The two helices pack against each other in the normal way with an inclination of 20° between the helical axes. The structure of the C-terminal domain, which is responsible for the main subunit interactions in the intact repressor, remains unknown. [Pg.133]

These genetic experiments clearly demonstrated that the proposed structural model for the binding of these proteins to the phage operators was essentially correct. The second a helix in the helix-turn-helix motif is involved in recognizing operator sites as well as in the differential selection of operators by P22 Cro and repressor proteins. However, a note of caution is needed many other early models of DNA-protein interactions proved to be misleading, if not wrong. Modeling techniques are more sophisticated today but are still not infallible and are certainly not replacements for experimental determinations of structure. [Pg.135]

How is the binding specificity of the heterodimer achieved compared with the specificity of Mat a2 alone The crystal structure rules out the simple model that the contacts made between the Mat a2 homeodomain and DNA are altered as a result of heterodimerization. The contacts between the Mat o2 homeodomain and DNA in the heterodimer complex are virtually indistinguishable from those seen in the structure of the Mat o2 monomer bound to DNA. However, there are at least two significant factors that may account for the increased specificity of the heterodimer. First, the Mat al homeodomain makes significant contacts with the DNA, and the heterodimeric complex will therefore bind more tightly to sites that provide the contacts required by both partners. Second, site-directed mutagenesis experiments have shown that the protein-protein interactions involving the... [Pg.163]

Residues 50-64 of the GAL4 fragment fold into an amphipathic a helix and the dimer interface is formed by the packing of these helices into a coiled coil, like those found in fibrous proteins (Chapters 3 and 14) and also in the leucine zipper families of transcription factors to be described later. The fragment of GAL4 comprising only residues 1-65 does not dimerize in the absence of DNA, but the intact GAL4 molecule does, because in the complete molecule residues between 65 and iOO also contribute to dimer interactions. [Pg.187]

No region of the cytochrome penetrates the membrane nevertheless, the cytochrome subunit is an integral part of this reaction center complex, held through protein-protein interactions similar to those in soluble globular multisubunit proteins. The protein-protein interactions that bind cytochrome in the reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis are strong enough to survive the purification procedure. However, when the reaction center of Rhodohacter sphaeroides is isolated, the cytochrome is lost, even though the structures of the L, M, and H subunits are very similar in the two species. [Pg.236]

Whereas the main challenge for the first bilayer simulations has been to obtain stable bilayers with properties (e.g., densities) which compare well with experiments, more and more complex problems can be tackled nowadays. For example, lipid bilayers were set up and compared in different phases (the fluid, the gel, the ripple phase) [67,68,76,81]. The formation of large pores and the structure of water in these water channels have been studied [80,81], and the forces acting on lipids which are pulled out of a membrane have been measured [82]. The bilayer systems themselves are also becoming more complex. Bilayers made of complicated amphiphiles such as unsaturated lipids have been considered [83,84]. The effect of adding cholesterol has been investigated [85,86]. An increasing number of studies are concerned with the important complex of hpid/protein interactions [87-89] and, in particular, with the structure of ion channels [90-92]. [Pg.642]

Baumgartner and coworkers [145,146] study lipid-protein interactions in lipid bilayers. The lipids are modeled as chains of hard spheres with heads tethered to two virtual surfaces, representing the two sides of the bilayer. Within this model, Baumgartner [145] has investigated the influence of membrane curvature on the conformations of a long embedded chain (a protein ). He predicts that the protein spontaneously localizes on the inner side of the membrane, due to the larger fluctuations of lipid density there. Sintes and Baumgartner [146] have calculated the lipid-mediated interactions between cylindrical inclusions ( proteins ). Apart from the... [Pg.648]

A protein interacts with a metabolite. The metabolite is dins a ligand which binds. specifically to this protein... [Pg.157]

The Two-Hybrid System to Identify Proteins Involved in Specific Protein-Protein Interactions... [Pg.417]


See other pages where Proteins to protein interactions is mentioned: [Pg.53]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.1311]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.2845]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.2064]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.665]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.365]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.387 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info