Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Protein dynamics molecular modelling

AD MacKerell Jr, D Bashford, M Bellott, RL Dunbrack Jr, JD Evanseck, MJ Eield, S Eischer, J Gao, H Guo, S Ha, D Joseph-McCarthy, L Kuchnir, K Kuczera, ETK Lau, C Mattos, S Michmck, T Ngo, DT Nguyen, B Prodhom, WE Reiher III, B Roux, M Schlenkrich, JC Smith, R Stote, J Straub, M Watanabe, J Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, D Ym, M Karplus. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102 3586-361 6, 1998. [Pg.305]

More detailed aspects of protein function can be obtained also by force-field based approaches. Whereas protein function requires protein dynamics, no experimental technique can observe it directly on an atomic scale, and motions have to be simulated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Also free energy differences (e.g. between binding energies of different protein ligands) can be characterised by MD simulations. Molecular mechanics or molecular dynamics based approaches are also necessary for homology modelling and for structure refinement in X-ray crystallography and NMR structure determination. [Pg.263]

J. C., Stote, R., Straub, J., Watanabe, M., Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J., Yin, D., Karplus, M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins./. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586-3515. [Pg.253]

MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102(18) 3586-3616... [Pg.247]

Rozanska, X. Chipot, C., Modeling ion-ion interaction in proteins a molecular dynamics free energy calculation of the guanidinium-acetate association, J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 9691-9694. [Pg.496]

One tool for working toward this objective is molecular mechanics. In this approach, the bonds in a molecule are treated as classical objects, with continuous interaction potentials (sometimes called force fields) that can be developed empirically or calculated by quantum theory. This is a powerful method that allows the application of predictive theory to much larger systems if sufficiently accurate and robust force fields can be developed. Predicting the structures of proteins and polymers is an important objective, but at present this often requires prohibitively large calculations. Molecular mechanics with classical interaction potentials has been the principal tool in the development of molecular models of polymer dynamics. The ability to model isolated polymer molecules (in dilute solution) is well developed, but fundamental molecular mechanics models of dense systems of entangled polymers remains an important goal. [Pg.76]

Equations (1-3) are widely used for protein dynamics analysis from relaxation measurements. The primary goals here are (A) to measure the spectral densities J(co) and, most important, (B) to translate them into an adequate picture of protein dynamics. The latter goal requires adequate theoretical models of motion that could be obtained from comparison with molecular dynamics simulations (see for example Ref. [23]). However, accurate analysis of experimental data is an essential prerequisite for such a comparison. [Pg.288]

This approach yields spectral densities. Although it does not require assumptions about the correlation function and therefore is not subjected to the limitations intrinsic to the model-free approach, obtaining information about protein dynamics by this method is no more straightforward, because it involves a similar problem of the physical (protein-relevant) interpretation of the information encoded in the form of SD, and is complicated by the lack of separation of overall and local motions. To characterize protein dynamics in terms of more palpable parameters, the spectral densities will then have to be analyzed in terms of model-free parameters or specific motional models derived e.g. from molecular dynamics simulations. The SD method can be extremely helpful in situations when no assumption about correlation function of the overall motion can be made (e.g. protein interaction and association, anisotropic overall motion, etc. see e.g. Ref. [39] or, for the determination of the 15N CSA tensor from relaxation data, Ref. [27]). [Pg.290]

Which model provides the best representation for local mobility in a particular group remains unclear, as a detailed picture of protein dynamics is yet to be painted. This information is not directly available from NMR measurements that are necessarily limited by the number of experimentally available parameters. Additional knowledge is required in order to translate these experimental data into a reliable motional picture of a protein. At this stage, molecular dynamic simulations could prove extremely valuable, because they can provide complete characterization of atomic motions for all atoms in a molecule and at all instants of the simulated trajectory. This direction becomes particularly promising with the current progress in computational resources, when the length of a simulated trajectory approaches the NMR-relevant time scales [23, 63, 64]. [Pg.301]

The molecular dynamics unit provides a good example with which to outline the basic approach. One of the most powerful applications of modem computational methods arises from their usefulness in visualizing dynamic molecular processes. Small molecules, solutions, and, more importantly, macromolecules are not static entities. A protein crystal structure or a model of a DNA helix actually provides relatively little information and insight into function as function is an intrinsically dynamic property. In this unit students are led through the basics of a molecular dynamics calculation, the implementation of methods integrating Newton s equations, the visualization of atomic motion controlled by potential energy functions or molecular force fields and onto the modeling and visualization of more complex systems. [Pg.222]


See other pages where Protein dynamics molecular modelling is mentioned: [Pg.350]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.923]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.3]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.45 ]




SEARCH



Model dynamical molecular

Model protein

Molecular dynamic models

Molecular dynamics modeling

Molecular dynamics modelling

Molecular protein

Protein dynamics proteins

Protein molecular models

Proteins molecular dynamics

Proteins molecular modelling

Structure-based computational models of ligand-protein binding dynamics and molecular docking

© 2024 chempedia.info