Prohibited purposes

In the cases of Australia and France the issue is ameliorated somewhat by the fact that both have incorporated the general purpose criterion into their legislation. Thus, at least post facto, both states would have the ability to penalize activities involving toxic chemicals that are undertaken for prohibited purposes. In addition, these States Parties would have the required regulatory framework for facilities working with toxic chemicals as a result of their participation in the Australia Group. 

The mid-spectrum region between chemical and biological agents includes substances such as bioregulators and toxins. These are all chemicals and almost all are not included in the Schedules - the two that are listed in Schedule 1 are ricin and saxitoxin. These mid-spectrum materials can now be readily produced in quantity -and for prohibited purposes, impurities are not a problem. The challenge to the Convention posed by such materials is further increased by the recent advances in drug-delivery techniques. 

Krutzsch and Trapp 2014, p. 94 This is needed to overcome any ambiguity and to identify the dividing line, agreed by the negotiators, that separates the chemicals designed for these non-prohibited purposes from chemical weapons . 

Article VI concerns Activities not prohibited by the Convention . It provides that states have the right to develop, produce or acquire toxic chemicals and their precursors for purposes not prohibited by the Convention . It also provides that the chemicals to be listed in the Annexes to the Article, which could be used for prohibited purposes, should be subject to international monitoring. States are required to declare data on the relevant chemicals and on their production facilities when the Convention enters into force and annually thereafter. They are required to permit routine systematic international verification through on-site inspection and the use of instruments as long as production and processing are not impaired . 

Table 5.20 Prohibition of certain substances hazardous to health for certain purposes...

Knowing what condition the equipment is in so that you can prohibit its use if the condition is unsatisfactory - you will need a Defect Report for this purpose. 

The final step of the whole reaction process is the desorption of the products. This step is essential not only for the practical purpose of collecting and storing the desired output, but also for the regeneration of the catalytic active sites of the surface. Most reactions have at least one rate-hmiting step, which frequently makes the reaction prohibitively slow for practical purposes when, e.g., it is intended for homogeneous (gas or fluid) media. The role of a good solid-state catalyst is to obtain an acceptable... 

There is a mud-discharge-rate limitation of 1,000 bbl/hr, with reduced rates near areas of biological concern. The discharge of mud containing diesel for lubricity purposes is prohibited. 

Where steam is used for sterilization, hospital duty, food and drug manufacturing processes, or steam humidification purposes, there generally is a reluctance (or mandated prohibition) to employ amines as a treatment for steam-condensate line corrosion protection. Clean-steam... 

Finally, it is very difficult to keep standard solutions for monitoring or recalibration purposes. Control batches should be purged and kept with a dry, inert gas. As long as results are reproduced, the system is considered to be in calibration. The relatively long extraction times usually prohibit the use of these methods for quality control analysis applications in a plastics manufacturing plant. 

Finally, one must take into account that in using a coupled enzyme assay one must produce, or purchase, not only the target enzyme of interest but also the coupling enzymes and any co-substrates required for these additional protein reagents. Hence a coupled enzyme assay can be quite expensive to implement, especially for large library screening. In some cases the cost may be prohibitive, precluding the use of a particular coupled enzyme assay for HTS purposes. 

Hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions between the sample molecules and the phospholipid bilayer membranes are thought to play a key role in the transport of such solute molecules. When dilute 2% phospholipid in alkane is used in the artificial membrane [25,556], the effect of hydrogen bonding and electrostatic effects may be underestimated. We thus explored the effects of higher phospholipid content in alkane solutions. Egg and soy lecithins were selected for this purpose, since multicomponent mixtures such as model 11.0 are very costly, even at levels of 2% wt/vol in dodecane. The costs of components in 74% wt/vol (see below) levels would have been prohibitive. 

This series of prohibitions restricts how wastes subject to LDR requirements are handled. The most visible aspect of the LDR program is the disposal prohibition, which includes treatment standards, variances, alternative treatment standards (ATSs), and notification requirements. Land disposal means placement in or on the land, except in a corrective action unit, and includes, but is not limited to, placement in a landfill, surface impoundment, waste pile, injection well, land treatment facility, salt dome formation, salt bed formation, underground mine or cave, or placement in a concrete vault, or bunker intended for disposal purposes. The other two components work in tandem with the disposal prohibition to guide the regulated community in proper hazardous waste management. The dilution prohibition ensures that wastes are properly treated, and the storage prohibition ensures that waste will not be stored indefinitely to avoid treatment. 

All use of chlordane was banned in Norway in 1967 (Ingebrigtsen et al. 1984). In August 1975, the USEPA issued its intent to suspend registrations and prohibit production of all pesticides containing heptachlor or chlordane, based on evidence of carcinogenicity (Glooschenko and Lott 1977). On July 1, 1983, chlordane use was prohibited in the United States for any purpose except to control underground termites. A similar situation exists in Japan (Ohno et al. 1986 Tojo et al. 1986). 

Under purposes non prohibited by this Convention according to Article II para 2 (a) - (d) are understood ... 

---