Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Process trends variable

One can apply a similar approach to samples drawn from a process over time to determine whether a process is in control (stable) or out of control (unstable). For both kinds of control chart, it may be desirable to obtain estimates of the mean and standard deviation over a range of concentrations. The precision of an HPLC method is frequently lower at concentrations much higher or lower than the midrange of measurement. The act of drawing the control chart often helps to identify variability in the method and, given that variability in the method is less than that of the process, the control chart can help to identify variability in the process. Trends can be observed as sequences of points above or below the mean, as a non-zero slope of the least squares fit of the mean vs. batch number, or by means of autocorrelation.106... [Pg.36]

However, a SIM during formulation development involves more than the above four steps, since the formulation development is a dynamic process where the formulation is optimized as the clinical program moves further along the development process. To continue the list from above, the following three steps must be added to the Ust (5) compatibility studies with excipients, (6) stability trending (variables would be temperature, humidity, and packaging material), and (7) mass balance for assay. An analytical chemist must revisit the separation of all components in the related substances method after steps 3,5, and 6 to ensure that the test method is truly a SIM. [Pg.707]

Table II. General process trends for W CMP for ViPRR type wafer carrier. Up arrows mean that the parameter increases as a function of an increase in the process variable. Table II. General process trends for W CMP for ViPRR type wafer carrier. Up arrows mean that the parameter increases as a function of an increase in the process variable.
The symbolic process consists of production rules, semantic networks, frames, and objects. Systems built on this principle are called expert systems and are useful for reasoning about process state (temperature, pressure, etc.) and process structures. The subsymbolic process is based on a model of biological neural system. Systems modeled on this principle are called artificial neural networks (ANNs) and are useful for reasoning about process trends and the complex causal interaction of process variables and states. [Pg.1166]

The frimace and its associated infrastructure (offgas cooling, bag house, etc.) are controlled by an upgraded Programable Logic Control (PLC) system. Several monitors located in the control room display all process variables associated with the operation. Field instruments which comprise the furnace control system provide 4—20 mA inputs and outputs to indicate gaseous as well as liquid flows, pressures, temperatures and levels. The displays include snapshot indications, controllers, process trends and alarms as well as griqihics. [Pg.336]

The process design variable selected for the modelled process in the multi-objective optimisation search engine is the portion of HCl recycled to the oxy-chlorinator unit while the produced HCl is dealt with as a by-product that have a specific value. It would be a straightforward extension to the framework to include multiple design variables - however, in this paper, only a single variable was considered for ease of demonstration. Also, as the environmental potentials in this case all trend in the same direction, the impact potential most sensitive to this design variable, i.e. GWP, was chosen to represent the environmental performance of the process. [Pg.289]

DCS process trending trend of important process variables. [Pg.418]

In many process-design calculations it is not necessary to fit the data to within the experimental uncertainty. Here, economics dictates that a minimum number of adjustable parameters be fitted to scarce data with the best accuracy possible. This compromise between "goodness of fit" and number of parameters requires some method of discriminating between models. One way is to compare the uncertainties in the calculated parameters. An alternative method consists of examination of the residuals for trends and excessive errors when plotted versus other system variables (Draper and Smith, 1966). A more useful quantity for comparison is obtained from the sum of the weighted squared residuals given by Equation (1). [Pg.107]

The micropore volume varied from -0.15 to -0.35 cmVg. No clear trend was observed with respect to the spatial variation. Data for the BET surface area are shown in Fig. 14. The surface area varied from -300 to -900 mVg, again with no clear dependence upon spatial location withm the monolith. The surface area and pore volume varied by a factor -3 withm the monolith, which had a volume of -1900 cm. In contrast, the steam activated monolith exhibited similar imcropore structure variability, but in a sample with less than one fiftieth of the volume. Pore size, pore volume and surface area data are given in Table 2 for four large monoliths activated via Oj chemisorption. The data in Table 2 are mean values from samples cored from each end of the monolith. A comparison of the data m Table 1 and 2 indicates that at bum-offs -10% comparable pore volumes and surface areas are developed for both steam activation and Oj chemisorption activation, although the process time is substantially longer in the latter case. [Pg.187]

Regarding concessions you will need to register all requests for concessions to product requirements and carry out a periodic analysis to detect trends. Is it always the same product, the same requirement, the same person or are there other variables that indicate that the requirements are unachievable and in need of change Under ideal conditions there should be no need for requesting concessions. The process should be fully capable for producing the goods. But if it happens frequently, there may be some underlying cause that has been overlooked. [Pg.465]

Although quite valuable when used properly, trends do not allow the analyst to confirm that a problem exists or to determine the cause of incipient problems. Another limitation is the limited number of values the system can handle. Further, the data needs to be normalized for speed, load, and process variables. [Pg.733]

Trend data that are not properly normalized for speed, load, and process variables are of little value. Since load and process-variable normalization requires a little more time during the data-acquisition process, many programs do not perform these adjustments. If this is the case, it is best to discontinue the use of trends altogether. [Pg.733]


See other pages where Process trends variable is mentioned: [Pg.209]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.1195]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.1880]    [Pg.1964]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.1199]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.208]   


SEARCH



Process variability

Process variables

Processing trends

Processing variables

© 2024 chempedia.info