Problem Description and Modeling

Based on the above problem description a model was developed using the RTN representation and considering the discretization of time. 

All of these models share an almost identical problem description, and focus mainly on the thermal effeet of the fire on the physico-chemical condition of the composite material as it deeomposes. However in most of them there lacks a complete description of the actual ignition or combustion processes relevant to the fire itself in the gaseous phase which is normally represented within these models as a simplified overhead heat flux. 

The shock-compression events are so extreme in intensity and duration, and remote from direct evaluation and from other environments, that experiment plays a crucial role in verifying and grounding the various theoretical descriptions. Indeed, the material models developed and advances in realistic numerical simulation are a direct result of advances in experimental methods. Furthermore, the experimental capabilities available to a particular scientist strongly control the problems pursued and the resulting descriptions of shock-compressed matter. Given the decisive role that experimental methods play, it is essential that careful consideration be given to their characteristics. 

The physicochemical forces between colloidal particles are described by the DLVO theory (DLVO refers to Deijaguin and Landau, and Verwey and Overbeek). This theory predicts the potential between spherical particles due to attractive London forces and repulsive forces due to electrical double layers. This potential can be attractive, or both repulsive and attractive. Two minima may be observed The primary minimum characterizes particles that are in close contact and are difficult to disperse, whereas the secondary minimum relates to looser dispersible particles. For more details, see Schowalter (1984). Undoubtedly, real cases may be far more complex Many particles may be present, particles are not always the same size, and particles are rarely spherical. However, the fundamental physics of the problem is similar. The incorporation of all these aspects into a simulation involving tens of thousands of aggregates is daunting and models have resorted to idealized descriptions. 

To address media-specific problems, single-media models for air, surface water, groundwater and soil pollution have been developed and used by different disciplines. Although these models generally provide detailed description of the pollutant distribution in space and time and incorporate mass transfer from other media as boundary conditions, they are not capable of characterizing the total environmental impact of a pollutant release. Multimedia models have been, therefore, developed to predict the concentration of chemicals in multiple environmental media simultaneously with consideration of chemical transport and transformation within and among media [1],... 

The NDF is very similar to the PDFs introduced in the previous section to describe turbulent reacting flows. However, the reader should not confuse them and must keep in mind that they are introduced for very different reasons. The NDF is in fact an extension of the finite-dimensional composition vector laminar flow where the PDFs are not needed, the NDF still introduces an extra dimension (1) to the problem description. The choice of the state variables in the CFD model used to solve the PBE will depend on how the internal coordinate is discretized. Roughly speaking (see Ramkrishna (2000) for a more complete discussion), there are two approaches that can be employed ... 

Do not lose sight of the domain terms even in your code. Use refinement to maintain trace-ability even as your code becomes more decoupled and reusable. Wherever possible, recast the problem domain descriptions themselves using these orthogonal and more abstract views remember, you are actively constructing a model of reality and not passively discovering it. Use frameworks (see Chapter 9, Model Frameworks and Template Packages) to explicitly document the mapping from domain terms to terms and roles in the abstract problem descriptions. 

Frameworks Across the business models and system specification, there often are generic problem frameworks that appear in specific forms. For example, the business description (and hence system spec) for a seminar company might have frameworks for resource allocation (assign instructors and rooms), inventory and production (maintain course notes inventory for deliveries), and customer loyalty (monitor product preferences... 

The problem description must then be formulated in mathematical terms and the mathematical model solved by computer simulation. 

The goal of this chapter is twofold. First we wish to critically compare—from both a conceptional and a practical point of view—various classical and mixed quantum-classical strategies to describe non-Born-Oppenheimer dynamics. To this end. Section II introduces five multidimensional model problems, each representing a specific challenge for a classical description. Allowing for exact quantum-mechanical reference calculations, aU models have been used as benchmark problems to study approximate descriptions. In what follows, Section III describes in some detail the mean-field trajectory method and also discusses its connection to time-dependent self-consistent-field schemes. The surface-hopping method is considered in Section IV, which discusses various motivations of the ansatz as well as several variants of the implementation. Section V gives a brief account on the quantum-classical Liouville description and considers the possibility of an exact stochastic realization of its equation of motion. 

The discussion above is a description of problem that requires answers to the following (1) the determination of the distribution of ions around a reference ion, and (2) the determination of the thickness (radius) of the ionic atmosphere. Obviously this is a complex problem. To solve this problem Debye and Huckel used a rather general approach they suggested an oversimplified model in order to obtain an approximate solutions. The Debye-Huckel model has two basic assumptions. The first is continuous dielectric assumption. In this assumption water (or the solvent) is a continuous dielectric and is not considered to be composed of molecular species. The second, is a continuous charge distribution in the ionic atmosphere. Put differently, charges of the ions in the ionic surrounding atmosphere are smoothened out (continuously distributed). 

---