Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Probability plot correlation

Since we do not know the proper values for X and t, we need a way of Judging plausible values of X and t from the data. We do this by testing the transformed background measurements for normality. Our choice of a test for normality is the probability plot correlation coefficient r (12). The coefficient r is the correlation between the ordered measurements and predicted values for an ordered set of normal random observations. We denote the ordered background measure-ments by yB(l). where yB(l) < yB(2) < yBCnn) denote the... [Pg.123]

Each of these data sets is skewed, yet each can be transformed to normality. With no transformation applied, the probability plot correlation coefficients for the Co, Fe, and Sc data sets are 0.855, 0.857, and 0.987, respectively. For Co and Fe, the hypothesis of normality is rejected at the 0.5 percent level (12). On the other hand, the maximum probability plot correlation coefficients are 0.993, 0.990, and 0.993 for Co, Fe, and Sc, respectively. The maxima occur at (X,t) (0,0.0048), (0,0.42), and (0.457,0), respectively. These maxima are so high that they provide no evidence that the range of transformations is inadequate. Note that the (, x) values at which the maxima occur correspond to log transformations with a shift for the Co and Fe and nearly a square-root transformation for the Sc. [Pg.126]

Calculate the normal probability plot for the residuals and compute the correlation coefficient. [Pg.140]

Looney, S.W. and Gulledge, T.R., Jr. Use of the correlation coefficient with normal probability plots. American Statistician 1985 39 75-79. [Pg.374]

The quality of the regression model is assessed in view of numerical and graphical information, which includes the model variance, confidence intervals on the parameter estimates, the linear correlation coefficient, residual and normal probability plots. The model variance is defined 5 = [(y-y) (y-y)]/v, where yand y are the measured and calculated vectors of the dependent variable respectively, v is the number of degrees of freedom (v= N- k +1)) and k is the number of independent variables included in the model. The linear correlation coefficient is defined by = [(y - (y - p)] /[(y -yf y- y)], where y is the mean of y. The variance and... [Pg.589]

By using the absorbance areas for the various IR peaks vs. composition and a knowledge of the sequence probabilities, a correlation between the absorbance plots of the various bands and the specific sequences responsible for those absorptions can be established. The C—H stretching resonances at 2800-3000 cm , which are proportional to the C—H concentration, are found to be proportional to the mono-ads... [Pg.159]

Correlation with markets for other products is particularly useful for a new product. For example, market growth history of an older product, eg, nylon, can be plotted on a graph to predict the probable growth for a newer product, eg, polyester fibers. Data for both products may be plotted on the same chart, though not necessarily to the same scale and with the time scale shifted to bring the respective curves in parallel. [Pg.535]

Earlier analyses making use of AH vs. AS plots generated many p values in the experimentally accessible range, and at least some of these are probably artifacts resulting from the error correlation in this type of plot. Exner s treatment yields p values that may be positive or negative and that are often experimentally inaccessible. Some authors have associated isokinetic relationships and p values with specific chemical phenomena, particularly solvation effects and solvent structure, but skepticism seems justified in view of the treatments of Exner and Krug et al. At the present time an isokinetic relationship should not be claimed solely on the basis of a plot of AH vs. A5, but should be examined by the Exner or Krug methods. [Pg.371]

The main problem in Eas0 vs. correlations is that the two experimental quantities are as a rule measured in different laboratories with different techniques. In view of the sensitivity of both parameters to the surface state of the metal, their uncertainties can in principle result of the same order of magnitude as AX between two metals. On the other hand, it is rare that the same laboratory is equipped for measuring both single-crystal face is not followed by a check of its perfection by means of appropriate spectroscopic techniques. In these cases we actually have nominal single-crystal faces. This is probably the reason for the observation of some discrepancies between differently prepared samples with the same nominal surface structure. Fortunately, there have been a few cases in which both Ea=0 and 0 have been measured in the same laboratory these will be examined later. Such measurements have enabled the resolution of controversies that have long persisted because of the basic criticism of Eazm0 vs. 0 plots. [Pg.157]

Figure 4.28. Correlation graph for file PROFILE.dat. The facts that (a) 23 out of 55 combinations yield probabilities of error below p = 0.04 (42% expected due to chance alone =8%) and (b) that they fall into a clear pattern makes it highly probable that the peak areas [%] of the corresponding chromatograms follow a hidden set of rules. This is borne out by plotting the vectors two by two. Because a single-sided test is used, p cannot exceed 0.5. Figure 4.28. Correlation graph for file PROFILE.dat. The facts that (a) 23 out of 55 combinations yield probabilities of error below p = 0.04 (42% expected due to chance alone =8%) and (b) that they fall into a clear pattern makes it highly probable that the peak areas [%] of the corresponding chromatograms follow a hidden set of rules. This is borne out by plotting the vectors two by two. Because a single-sided test is used, p cannot exceed 0.5.
Since the histogram gives a probability density function of the particle position, the correlation in the velocities Vy and V2j in the j-direction causes the change in the shape of the histogram plotted against Vy and V2j, due to the different coefficient y — Pj in... [Pg.123]

When experimental data are collected over time or distance there is always a chance of having autocorrelated residuals. Box et al. (1994) provide an extensive treatment of correlated disturbances in discrete time models. The structure of the disturbance term is often moving average or autoregressive models. Detection of autocorrelation in the residuals can be established either from a time series plot of the residuals versus time (or experiment number) or from a lag plot. If we can see a pattern in the residuals over time, it probably means that there is correlation between the disturbances. [Pg.156]

For the parameters used to obtain the results in Fig. 3, X 0.6 so the mean free path is comparable to the cell length. If X -C 1, the correspondence between the analytical expression for D in Eq. (43) and the simulation results breaks down. Figure 4a plots the deviation of the simulated values of D from Do as a function of X. For small X values there is a strong discrepancy, which may be attributed to correlations that are not accounted for in Do, which assumes that collisions are uncorrelated in the time x. For very small mean free paths, there is a high probability that two or more particles will occupy the same collision volume at different time steps, an effect that is not accounted for in the geometric series approximation that leads to Do. The origins of such corrections have been studied [19-22]. [Pg.103]

The presence of a transporter can be assessed by comparing basolateral-to-apical with apical-to-basolateral transport of substrates in polarized cell monolayers. If P-gp is present, then basolateral-to-apical transport is enhanced and apical-to baso-lateral transport is reduced. Transport experiments are in general performed with radioactively labeled compounds. Several studies have been performed with Caco-2 cell lines (e.g. Ref. [85]). Since Caco-2 cells express a number of different transporters, the effects measured are most probably specific for the ensemble of transporters rather than for P-gp alone. P-gp-specific transport has been assayed across confluent cell layers formed by polarized kidney epithelial cells transfected with the MDR1 gene [86], Figure 20.11 shows experimental data obtained with these cell lines. A rank order for transport called substrate quality was determined for a number of compounds [86]. The substrate quality is a qualitative estimate, but nevertheless allows an investigation of the role of the air/water (or lipid/water) partition coefficient, log Kaw, for transport as seen in Fig. 20.11(A). For most of the compounds, a linear correlation is observed between substrate quality and log Kaw- However, four compounds are not transported at all despite their distinct lipophilicity. A plot of the substrate quality as a function of the potential of a... [Pg.481]


See other pages where Probability plot correlation is mentioned: [Pg.123]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.145]   


SEARCH



Correlation plots

Correlation, plotting

Probability plot

Probability plot correlation detection

© 2024 chempedia.info