Principal components analysis advantages

Other chemometrics methods to improve caUbration have been advanced. The method of partial least squares has been usehil in multicomponent cahbration (48—51). In this approach the concentrations are related to latent variables in the block of observed instmment responses. Thus PLS regression can solve the colinearity problem and provide all of the advantages discussed earlier. Principal components analysis coupled with multiple regression, often called Principal Component Regression (PCR), is another cahbration approach that has been compared and contrasted to PLS (52—54). Cahbration problems can also be approached using the Kalman filter as discussed (43). 

Multivariate chemometric techniques have subsequently broadened the arsenal of tools that can be applied in QSAR. These include, among others. Multivariate ANOVA [9], Simplex optimization (Section 26.2.2), cluster analysis (Chapter 30) and various factor analytic methods such as principal components analysis (Chapter 31), discriminant analysis (Section 33.2.2) and canonical correlation analysis (Section 35.3). An advantage of multivariate methods is that they can be applied in... 

The interpretation of a multivariate image is sometimes problematic because the cause for pictorial structures may be complex and cannot be interpreted on the basis of images of single species even if they are processed by filtering etc. In such cases, principal component analysis (PCA) may advantageously be applied. The principle of the PCA is like that of factor analysis which has been mathematically described in Sect. 8.3.4. It is represented schematically in Fig. 8.33. 

The extent of homogeneous mixing of pharmaceutical components such as active drug and excipients has been studied by near-IR spectroscopy. In an application note from NIRSystems, Inc. [47], principal component analysis and spectral matching techniques were used to develop a near-IR technique/algorithm for determination of an optimal mixture based upon spectral comparison with a standard mixture. One advantage of this technique is the use of second-derivative spectroscopy techniques to remove any slight baseline differences due to particle size variations. 

In the past few years, PLS, a multiblock, multivariate regression model solved by partial least squares found its application in various fields of chemistry (1-7). This method can be viewed as an extension and generalization of other commonly used multivariate statistical techniques, like regression solved by least squares and principal component analysis. PLS has several advantages over the ordinary least squares solution therefore, it becomes more and more popular in solving regression models in chemical problems. 

There are many advantages in using this approach to feature selection. First, chance classification is not a serious problem because the bulk of the variance or information content of the feature subset selected is about the classification problem of interest. Second, features that contain discriminatory information about a particular classification problem are usually correlated, which is why feature selection methods using principal component analysis or other variance-based methods are generally preferred. Third, the principal component plot... 

The advantage of utilizing the standardized form of the variable is that quantities of different types can be included in the analysis including elemental concentrations, wind speed and direction, or particle size information. With the standardized variables, the analysis is examining the linear additivity of the variance rather than the additivity of the variable itself. The disadvantage is that the resolution is of the deviation from the mean value rather than the resolution of the variables themselves. There is, however, a method to be described later for performing the analysis so that equation 16 applies. Then, only variables that are linearly additive properties of the system can be included and other variables such as those noted above must be excluded. Equation 17 is the model for principal components analysis. The major difference between factor analysis and components analysis is the requirement that common factors have the significant values of a for more than one variable and an extra factor unique to the particular variable is added. The factor model can be rewritten as... 

Other strong advantages of PCR over other methods of calibration are that the spectra of the analytes have not to be known, the number of compounds contributing to the signal have not to be known on the beforehand, and the kind and concentration of the interferents should not be known. If interferents are present, e.g. NI, then the principal components analysis of the matrix, D, will reveal that there are NC = NA -I- NI significant eigenvectors. As a consequence the dimension of the factor score matrix A becomes (NS x NC). Although there are NC components present in the samples, one can suffice to relate the concentrations of the NA analytes to the factor score matrix by C = A B and therefore, it is not necessary to know the concentrations of the interferents. 

A generalised structure of an electronic nose is shown in Fig. 15.9. The sensor array may be QMB, conducting polymer, MOS or MS-based sensors. The data generated by each sensor are processed by a pattern-recognition algorithm and the results are then analysed. The ability to characterise complex mixtures without the need to identify and quantify individual components is one of the main advantages of such an approach. The pattern-recognition methods maybe divided into non-supervised (e.g. principal component analysis, PCA) and supervised (artificial neural network, ANN) methods also a combination of both can be used. 

As seen from Fig. 5.3, the substrate concentration is most sensitive to the parameters around t = 7 hours. It is therefore advantageous to select more observation points in this region when designing identification experiments (see Section 3.10.2). The sensitivity functions, especially with respect to Ks and Kd, seem to be proportional to each other, and the near—linear dependence of the columns in the Jacobian matrix may lead to ill-conditioned parameter estimation problem. Principal component analysis of the matrix STS is a powerful help in uncovering such parameter dependences. The approach will be discussed in Section 5.8.1. 

The exclusive consideration of common factors seems to be promising, especially for such environmental analytical problems, as is shown by the variance splitting of the investigated data material (Tab. 7-2). Errors in the analytical process and feature-specific variances can be separated from the common reduced solution by means of estimation of the communalities. This shows the advantage of the application of FA, rather than principal components analysis, for such data structures. Because the total variance of the data sets has been investigated by principal components analysis, it is difficult to separate specific factors from common factors. Interpretation with regard to environmental analytical problems is, therefore at the very least rendered more difficult, if not even falsified for those analytical results which are relatively strongly affected by errors. 

The advent of personal computers greatly facilitated the application of spectroscopic methods for both quantitative and qualitative analysis. It is no longer necessary to be a spectroscopic expert to use the methods for chemical analyses. Presently, the methodologies are easy and fast and take advantage of all or most of the spectral data. In order to understand the basis for most of the current processing methods, we will address two important techniques principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS). When used for quantitative analysis, PCA is referred to as principal component regression (PCR). We will discuss the two general techniques of PCR and PLS separately, but we also will show the relationship between the two. 

The method of the principal component analysis of the rate sensitivity matrix with a previous preselection of necessary species is a relatively simple and effective way for finding a subset of a large reaction mechanism that produces very similar simulation results for the important concentration profiles and reaction features. This method has an advantage over concentration sensitivity methods, in that the log-normalized rate sensitivity matrix depends algebraically on reaction rates and can be easily computed. For large mechanisms this could provide considerable time savings for the reduction process. This method has been applied for mechanism reduction to several reaction schemes [96-102]. 

In the following sections, the methods of principal components analysis (PCA) and factor anafysis (FA) are described. Principal components analysis is a special case of factor analysis. It is discussed how these methods can be applied to the above problem. Fortunately, these methods are not difficult to understand. A great advantage is that the results obtained by these methods cases can usually be evaluated graphically by visual interpretation of various plots. The systematic variation of the properties for a set of compounds is graphically displayed and it is therefore easy to see how a selection which spreads the properties should be made. 

Corresponding to the dimension d = 2, the poset shown in Fig. 19 can alternatively be visualized by a two-dimensional grid as is shown in Fig. 22. Both visualizations have their advantages. Structures within a Hasse diagram, e.g., successor sets, or sets of objects separated from others by incomparabilities, can be more easily disclosed by a representation like that of Fig. 19. In multivariate statistics reduction of data is typically performed by principal components analysis or by multidimensional scaling. These methods minimize the variance or preserve the distance between objects optimally. When order relations are the essential aspect to be preserved in the data analysis, the optimal result is a visualization of the sediment sites within a two-dimensional grid. 

---