Pressurized water reactors plant

ANSI/ANS 51.1, "Nuclear Safety criteria for the Design of Stationary Pressurized Water Reactor Plants", 1983. 

Bergmann, C. A., Roesmer, J. Coolant chemistry effects on radioactivity at two pressurized water reactor plants. Report EPRI NP-3463 (1984)... 

ANS 51.1 ANS 51.7 Nuclear safety criteria for the design of stationary pressurized water reactor plants Single failure criteria for PWR fluid systems... 

For pressurized water reactor plants the transients with the greatest potential for damage in the event of a failure to scram are the loss of... 

The safety classification methodology was derived from the standard, ANSI/ANS-51.1, "Nuclear Safety Criteria for the Design of Stationary Pressurized Water Reactor Plants" (Reference 2). The plan describes three safety-related classes and one nonnuclear safety class. The definitions for Safety Classes 1, 2, and 3 were found to comply with the standard definitions contained in 10 CFR 50.55a and NRC Regulatory Guide 1.26 (References 3 and 4). The definition for the nonnuclear safety class was included, but is outside the scope of this evaluation. 

Fig. 1. Pressurized water reactor (PWR) coolant system having U-tube steam generators typical of the 3—4 loops in nuclear power plants. PWR plants having once-through steam generators contain two reactor coolant pump-steam generator loops. CVCS = chemical and volume-control system.

Four boiling water reactor (BWR), and 15 pressurized water reactor (PWR) li acknowledged plant vulnerabilities. Some BWR vulnerabilities are failure of ... 

For nuclear plants reactor type BWR for Boiling Water reactor, PWR for pressurized water reactor... 

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI 1981) conducted a survey of transuranic radionuclides in the terrestrial environs of nuclear power plants in the United States in 1978-1979. The plants included two pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and two BWRs that were of modem design and had been in operation at least 3 years. The 241 Am air concentrations around all of the power plants were extremely low and indistinguishable from fallout background... 

The nuclear plants now operating in the U.S. are light water reactors, which use water as both a moderator and coolant. These are sometimes called Generation II reactors. In these Generation II Pressurized Water Reactors, the water circulates through the core where it is heated by the nuclear chain reaction. The hot water is turned into steam at a steam generator and the steam is used by a turbine generator to produce electric power. 

All over the world, 432 nuclear power reactors are under operation and more than 36 GW of electricity could be produced as of December 31, 2001. There are several types of reactors such as boiling water reactor (BWR), pressurized water reactor (PWR), Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU), and others. In these reactors, light water is normally used not only as a coolant, but also as a moderator. On the contrary, in CANDU reactors, heavy water is taken. It is widely known that the quality control of coolant water, the so-called water chemistry, is inevitably important for keeping the integrity of the plant. 

The most efficient matrix for retention of actinides and fission products is the uraninite mineral. However, it has been shown that other matricies such as apatite, clay minerals, zirconium silicates, and oxides (Fe, Mn) may also be important in the retention of fission products and actinides. For example, Pu was stored in apatite (Bros et al. 1996) and chlorite (Bros et al. 1993) in the core of the reactor 10. In the core of the reactors, between uraninite grains, 20-200 (j.m-sized metallic aggregates containing fissiogenic Ru, Rh, and Te associated with As, Pb, and S were found. These aggregates also exist in spent fuels of water-pressured type reactor plants, suggesting their analogy with spent fuels. 

Fig. 35. Sectional view of the 600 MWe pressurized water reactor (PWR) expected to be operational by 1995. Considered the PWR of the future, the plant is designed for a minimum useful life span of 60 years and features numerous economic and safety features, including passive systems for ultimate protection. (Joint project of Westinghou.se, the Electric Power Research Institute, and the (J.S. Department of Energy)...

France owns a major nuclear power plant program for electricity production (more than 70% of total production). Both reactors for civil and defence programs are pressurized water reactors, with similar fissile materials. 

The EPA report makes reference to a total of 250 existing and 145 new coal-fired plants, 25 boiling-water reactors (BWR), and 44 pressurized-water reactors (PWR) in the U.S. On a direct comparison at suburban sites between coal and nuclear plants, BWR facilities each can be expected to produce 0.0013 fatal cancers per year and PWR facilities, 0.0009 fatal cancers per year. Existing coal-fired plants, on the other hand, each can be expected to produce 0.10 fatal cancers per year and new coal plants, 0.017 fatal cancers per year. 

Nuclear power plants in the United States use light water moderated nuclear reactors (LWR) that produce the steam to generate electricity. The fuel elements for boiling water reactors and pressurized water reactors (PWR) are nearly the same. The fuel is uranium dioxide enriched with 3 % and this produces a nearly uniform spent fuel, which would be the feed for domestic fuel reprocessing. 

Calculations were made for a thermal-neutron flux of 3.5 X 10 /(cm s), considered representative of a 1060-MWe pressurized-water reactor similar to one manufactured by Westinghouse for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant [A1 ]. 

To relate these resource estimates to nuclear electric generation, it may be noted that a 1000-MWe pressurized-water reactor operating at 80 percent capacity factor without recycle, on uranium enriched to 3.3 w/o (weight percent) U in an enrichment plant stripping natural uranium to 0.3 w/o U, consumes around 200 MT of uranium per year. Thus the U.S. resource estimate of 1758 thousand MT available at less than 50/lb UgOg would keep a 300,000-MWe nuclear power industry in fuel for... 

---