Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Preservatives sample preparation

Compounds bearing the functional groups of the present chapter are usually analyzed for the characteristic N heteroatom and less frequently for O. In this section some recent advances in the analysis of these heteroatoms are presented. A critical review appeared of the analysis of the nutrient elements C, N, P and Si, and their speciation in environmental waters, including sample collection and preservation, sample preparation and methods for end analysis5. [Pg.1045]

As mentioned earlier, the complete analytical process involves sampling, sample preservation, sample preparation, and finally, analysis. The purpose of quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) is to monitor, measure, and keep the systematic and random errors under control. QA/QC measures are necessary during sampling, sample preparation, and analysis. It has been stated that sample preparation is usually the major source of variability in a measurement process. Consequently, the QA/QC during this step is of utmost importance. The discussion here centers on QC during sample preparation. [Pg.25]

Electron Beam Techniques. One of the most powerful tools in VLSI technology is the scanning electron microscope (sem) (see Microscopy). A sem is typically used in three modes secondary electron detection, back-scattered electron detection, and x-ray fluorescence (xrf). AH three techniques can be used for nondestmctive analysis of a VLSI wafer, where the sample does not have to be destroyed for sample preparation or by analysis, if the sem is equipped to accept large wafer-sized samples and the electron beam is used at low (ca 1 keV) energy to preserve the functional integrity of the circuitry. Samples that do not diffuse the charge produced by the electron beam, such as insulators, require special sample preparation. [Pg.356]

Sample preparation used to extract proteins from cells prior to analysis is an important step that can have an effect on the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. Proteins isolated from bacterial cells will have co-extracted contaminants such as lipids, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids. In addition various organic salts, buffers, detergents, surfactants, and preservatives may have been added to aid in protein extraction or to retain enzymatic or biological activity of the proteins. The presence of these extraneous materials can significantly impede or affect the reproducibility of analysis if they are not removed prior to analysis. [Pg.206]

Numerous CE separations have been published for synthetic colours, sweeteners and preservatives (Frazier et al., 2000a Sadecka and Polonsky, 2000 Frazier et al., 2000b). A rapid CZE separation with diode array detection for six common synthetic food dyes in beverages, jellies and symps was described by Perez-Urquiza and Beltran (2000). Kuo et al. (1998) separated eight colours within 10 minutes using a pH 9.5 borax-NaOH buffer containing 5 mM /3-cyclodextrin. This latter method was suitable for separation of synthetic food colours in ice-cream bars and fmit soda drinks with very limited sample preparation. However the procedure was not validated for quantitative analysis. A review of natural colours and pigments analysis was made by Watanabe and Terabe (2000). Da Costa et al. (2000) reviewed the analysis of anthocyanin colours by CE and HPLC but concluded that the latter technique is more robust and applicable to complex sample types. Caramel type IV in soft drinks was identified and quantified by CE (Royle et al., 1998). [Pg.124]

Fort he determination of preservatives and sweeteners in soft drinks or fruit juices LC analysis with UV detection is widely used. The sample pretreatment, prior to LC analysis, often consists only of degassing, filtration and dilution of the Uqirid [2]. Sometimes a Uqirid-Uqitid extraction, suitable not only for soft drinks but also for more complex matrices, is appUed [3]. Chemometric methods appUed to overlapped spectra offer the advantage of minimizing or eliminating sample preparation by allowing to simirltaneoirsly determining one or more analytes in relatively complex matrices. [Pg.300]

For a liquid or semi-solid pharmaceutical dosage form, it is crucial to include a preservative in the formulation. Commonly used preservatives in these systems include sodium benzoate, EDTA, sorbic acid, and parabens. A generic HPLC method is also recommended for the preservatives used in liquid formulations for routine monitoring to ensure the stability of the preservative itself and it must be validated specific to its use with the dosage form. (See chapters on Sample Preparation and Method Development.)... [Pg.353]

Adequate analytical methods exist for the analysis of 1,2-diphenylhydrazine in environmental samples and are presented below. However, adequate methods are not available for the sampling, sample preservation, and sample preparation (extraction) of environmental media. Neither ERA nor NIOSH have standard methods for analyzing 1,2-diphenylhydrazine in any medium ... [Pg.57]

In Figure 3, the active steroid (triamcinolone acetonide) and preservative (benzyl alcohol) are determined from a steroid cream. The higher molecular weight components of the cream base are well separated from the analytes. The ability to elute all the components of a cream or ointment in a SMGPC analysis gives an important sample preparation advantage over competing separation techniques. [Pg.177]

The chemical or physical form of trace metals in water is often of interest. The form in which a specific element is present will often influence is toxic effects. For instance the chemical state of chromium affects its toxicity i.e., Cr+6 is more carcino genic than Cr+3, Kopp (48) has described the various forms in which metals may he present. The categories include dissolved metals, suspended metals, total metals, extractable metals and organometallics. In addition, Kopp describes sample preparation requirements for each category. Gihhs (20) has also studied metal species in river water. It should be obvious that the desired analytical result has to he considered beforehand. For example, if dissolved metal concentrations were desired and normal acid preservation performed, suspended metals could possibly be solubilized to a large extent. Both Hamilton (25) and Robertson (81) have shown vast differences between acidified and non-acidified samples. Many other publications have dealt with this subject (16, 37, 80, 30). [Pg.104]

In contrast to soft biologies, whose mechanical properties primarily depend upon the orientation of collagen fibers, the mechanical properties of mineralized tissues, or hard biologies, are more complicated. Factors such as density, mineral content, fat content, water content, and sample preservation and preparation play important roles in mechanical property determination. Specimen orientation also plays a key role, since most hard biologies such as bone are composite structures. For the most part, we will concentrate on the average properties of these materials and will relate these values to those of important, man-made replacement materials. [Pg.524]

The BET specific surface area, mesopore volumes, and pore wall thickness of the calcined and water-treated samples are given in Table 3. BET surface area of the samples prepared with Cm surfactants were found to be less affected by hydrothermal treatment. When the samples synthesized without TPA+ subjected to hydrothermal treatment the sharp inflection in the isotherm became very broad indicating wide distribution of pores. In contrast, the mesopore distribution of the samples prepared with TPA was found to be less affected by hydrothermal treatment. For the samples prepared without TPA, the mesopore volume was found to decrease sharply and the pore diameter was broadened over a large range indicating loss of the mesopore structure. Addition of TPA was found to minimize the structural collapse and thereby helps to preserve the mesoporosity. [Pg.91]

Various other workers have reviewed the sample preparation and preservation [35] and analytical determination of [36-38] mycotoxins in cereals and Inhat [39] and Beaver [41] have reviewed gas chromatographic methods for the determination of mycotoxins. [Pg.223]


See other pages where Preservatives sample preparation is mentioned: [Pg.8]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.173]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.580 ]




SEARCH



Food preservatives sample preparation

Preserving samples

© 2024 chempedia.info