Frank-Oseen free energy

Worked Example 10.1 shows how to calculate the Frank-Oseen free energy and use it to predict the response of a liquid crystal to a magnetic or electric field. Such calculations are used to design practical liquid-crystal display devices. They also can be used to determine the values of the elastic constants. 

A theoretical relation between the nematic elastic constants and the order parameter, without the need for a molecular interpretation, can be established by a Landau-de Gennes expansion of the free energy and comparison with the Frank-Oseen elastic energy expression. While the Frank theory describes the free energy in terms of derivatives of the director field in terms of symmetries and completely disregards the nematic order parameter. The Landau-de Gennes expansion expresses the free energy in terms of the tensor order parameter 0,-, and its derivatives (see e.g. [287,288]). For uniaxial nematics, this spatially dependent tensor order parameter is... 

Topologically, it turns out that the helical structure of the cholesteric cannot be deformed continuously to produce a cubic lattice without creating defects. Thus BP I and BP II are unique examples in nature of a regular three-dimensional lattice composed of disclination lines. Possible unit cells of such a disclination network, arrived at by minimizing the Oseen-Frank free energy, are shown in fig. 4.8.3. The tubes in the diagram represent disclination lines, whose cores are supposed to consist of isotropic (liquid) material. Precisely which of these configurations represents the true situation is a matter for further study. 

In other words, both twist and bend distortions are absent, leaving only the splay term in the Oseen-Frank free energy expression (3.3.7). It is seen from fig. 5.3.1, that by merely bending or corrugating the layers a splay deformation can be readily achieved without affecting the layer thickness. 

One optical feature of helicoidal structures is the ability to rotate the plane of incident polarized light. Since most of the characteristic optical properties of chiral liquid crystals result from the helicoidal structure, it is necessary to understand the origin of the chiral interactions responsible for the twisted structures. The continuum theory of liquid crystals is based on the Frank-Oseen approach to curvature elasticity in anisotropic fluids. It is assumed that the free energy is a quadratic function of curvature elastic strain, and for positive elastic constants the equilibrium state in the absence of surface or external forces is one of zero deformation with a uniform, parallel director. If a term linear in the twist strain is permitted, then spontaneously twisted structures can result, characterized by a pitch p, or wave-vector q=27tp i, where i is the axis of the helicoidal structure. For the simplest case of a nematic, the twist elastic free energy density can be written as ... 

As discussed in Sec. 2.2.2.1, the foundations of the continuum model were laid by Oseen [61] and Zocher [107] some seventy years ago, and this model was reexamined by Frank [65], who introduced the concept of curvature elasticity to describe the equilibrium free energy. This theory is used, to this day, to determine splay, twist, and bend distortions in nematic materials. The dynamic models or how the director field behaves in changing from one equilibrium state to another have taken much longer to evolve. This is primarily due to the interdependency of the director it (r, t) and v (r, /) fields, which in the case of chiral nematics is made much more complex due to the long-range, spiraling structural correlations. The most widely used dynamic theory for chiral... 

Inserting this in Eq. (216) we find that the Lifshitz invariant (which has a composition rule slightly reminiscent of angular momentum, cf. Lj( = xpy-ypx) in the cholesteric case has the value equal to q, the wave vector. In fact we can gain some familiarity with this invariant by starting from an expression we know quite well, the Oseen-Frank expression for the elastic free energy Eq. (96). Because of its symmetry, this expression cannot describe the cholesteric state of a nematic which lacks reflection symmetry and where the twisted state represents the lowest energy. Now, if there is a constant twist with wave vector q, the value of n Fxn in the K22 term equals-q. The expression Eq. (96) therefore has to be renormalized to... 

The Oseen-ZOcher-Frank equation [13] for the free energy density F allows a good understanding of chiral nematic phases [1,2] ... 

---