Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential, surface species distribution

There are two alternatives available for calculating the surface species distribution in a sample or a mixed electrolyte solution. One approach is the solution equilibrium computer program MINEQL (32) as modified to include surface species by Davis al. (17). The surface species distribution is calculated by simultaneously solving the equations for charge, potential, total surface sites and individual surface species. [Pg.288]

The pll dependence of (-potential, surface speciation and colloid stability ratios is presented in Figure 4. In panel (a) of Figure 4, the solid line represents the surface potential from the model, and the data points correspond to ( potential from electrokinetic measurements. The dashed line represents a reduced potential calculated at a distance of 4.0 nm from the surface. In panel (b). the surface species distribution is calculated by the SCF/DLM model. Under these conditions, the observed zero iiiterfacial potential is in the range pH 7.2 to 7.5, which suggests... [Pg.298]

Figure 4 Comparison of potentials, and surface species distribution, Ci, and experimental stability ratio, Wexp, as a function of pH in the presence of 0.2 millimolar total phthalate species. Hematite solid concentration is 17.0 mg/1, and ionic strength is 5 millimolar. The diffuse layer thickness , /c , is 4.0 nm. Figure 4 Comparison of potentials, and surface species distribution, Ci, and experimental stability ratio, Wexp, as a function of pH in the presence of 0.2 millimolar total phthalate species. Hematite solid concentration is 17.0 mg/1, and ionic strength is 5 millimolar. The diffuse layer thickness , /c , is 4.0 nm.
The reactions and identification of small isomeric species were reviewed by McEwan in 199223 Since that time, additional experimental data have been obtained on more complex systems. In the present review, smaller systems will only be mentioned where there has been an advance since the previous review and emphasis here will be concentrated on the correlation between reactivity, the form of the potential surface, and the isomeric forms. There is also a wealth of kinetic data (rate coefficients and product ion distributions) for ion-molecule reactions in the compilations of Ikezoe et al.24 and Anicich,25,26 some of which refer to isomeric species. Thermochemical data relevant to such systems, and some isomeric information, is contained in the compilations of Rosenstock et al.,27 Lias et al.,28 29 and Hunter and Lias.30... [Pg.87]

With solid samples (e.g. suspended particles, sediments and soils), determination of the species distribution pattern usually involves a series of selective chemical extraction steps, but it is now recognised that many experimental parameters can influence the amount extracted by the reagents, and there are many potential sources of error. For example, during an extraction step, metal ions released from one phase can resorb on other exposed surfaces and, where coatings are being removed in the process, the values obtained can be influenced by the order in which reagents are used. [Pg.11]

A spectral band is characterised by its frequency range, its intensity, and its shape and breadth. The frequency change in the XH stretching tend (Av) is often used as an approximate measure of the strength of the H-bond. Enthalpies of H-bond formation are usually determined from the temperature variation of the free-associated intensity ratio of the same bands. Of even greater interest are, however, the geometries and the potential surfaces of H-bonded species and the distribution of the electronic charge therein. For this the spectra of the isolated H-bond complexes that is, gas phase spectra are needed. The fine structure of the bands has to be examined. Key questions are how do the new vibrational motions introduced by the formation of a H-bond interact with the internal motions of the components X and Y How could this be inferred from the observed breadth and fine structure of the bands ... [Pg.43]

From this equation, the potential function can be determined, and therefore also the species distributions via Eq. (2-41), once suitable boundary conditions are given. One boundary condition is simply the reference position at which one chooses to set = 0. The remaining boundary conditions are usually specifications of either the surface charge density a (in coulombs/meter) or the surface potential... [Pg.88]

The charges assigned to the surface species in reaction 44 indicate relative values. Surface equilibrium constants need to be established in order to estimate the species distribution as a function of [H" ] and other potential-determining species. An aqueous suspension of CaC03 crystals in the presence of CO2 iPcoi - constant) at the point of zero charge (pHpzc) at equilibrium—in line... [Pg.567]

The simple surface hydration and proton exchange enables the metal cation complexes also to adsorb due to ligand exchange. Equally with the solvent association and condensation processes this adsorption may lead to the formation of extended gel structures and surface precipitation. However, as the surface site distribution and surface potential influence these processes, the physicochemical conditions (pS, pH, pi, pe) where they occur do not match those for the solution species. ... [Pg.494]

Metal cyclopentadienyl complexes can also be used as cocatalysts, with the intent of creating chromocene-like structures on the surface of the catalyst, as shown in Scheme 46. Chromocene catalysts, which contain mono-attached chromium species incorporating one cyclopentadienyl ligand, are noted for their sensitivity to H2. It is believed that Cr/silica catalysts can be modified to make this species by the addition of metal cyclopentadienyls to the reactor, such as LiCp or MgCp2 [695],or by use of a combination of cyclopentadiene or indene with an aluminum alkyl cocatalyst [696]. When these modified catalysts are allowed to polymerize ethylene in the presence of a remarkable broadening of the polymer MW distribution is observed, mainly as a result of a shift of the low-MW part of the MW distribution. The chromocene surface species is known for its ability to incorporate H2 (thus lowering the polymer MW) and also to reject 1-hexene. Thus, these unusual cocatalysts have the potential to reverse the normal branch profile of polymers made with Cr/silica catalysts (i.e., to put more branches into the longer chains). [Pg.503]

With known site densities, equilibrium constants for each site, and each solution component, and a way to relate surface potential to surface charge, the distribution of aqueous and surface species can now be solved in the same way as solutions with no surfaces. Bethke (1996) gives details of the method. [Pg.142]

FIG. 2 Schematic representation of SCMs CCM, DLM and TLM charge distribution (top) and potential decay (middle) within a nanometer-scale distance and surface species on oxides (bottom). [Pg.728]


See other pages where Potential, surface species distribution is mentioned: [Pg.497]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.874]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.911]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.4640]    [Pg.4641]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.1162]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.251]   


SEARCH



Distribution potential

Species distribution

Surface distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info