Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface species, distribution

The complexation constants of the individual major seawater ions with otFeOOH determined in single salt solutions can be used to predict the titratable charge and surface species distribution of goethite in seawater. This prediction can then be compared with the experimentally determined charge of goethite in a mixed seawater type electrolyte. [Pg.288]

There are two alternatives available for calculating the surface species distribution in a sample or a mixed electrolyte solution. One approach is the solution equilibrium computer program MINEQL (32) as modified to include surface species by Davis al. (17). The surface species distribution is calculated by simultaneously solving the equations for charge, potential, total surface sites and individual surface species. [Pg.288]

The titratable charge is mathematically related to the surface species distributions (Equation 27). [Pg.290]

Table II is a summary of the surface species distributions with pH. These were used to calculate a titratable charge. The effect of the ionized surface species (FeO and FeOHj) on the titratable charge and surface species distributions is less than the effect of the potassium complexes. Also included in Table II are the % contributions of the individual complexes to the total calculated charge. In Figure 7 the calculated charge is compared with the titratable charge determined by the potentio-metric titration of aFeOOH in a major seawater ion electrolyte. Also included in Figure 7 is a compilation of the titration data used in determining the calculated charge. Table II is a summary of the surface species distributions with pH. These were used to calculate a titratable charge. The effect of the ionized surface species (FeO and FeOHj) on the titratable charge and surface species distributions is less than the effect of the potassium complexes. Also included in Table II are the % contributions of the individual complexes to the total calculated charge. In Figure 7 the calculated charge is compared with the titratable charge determined by the potentio-metric titration of aFeOOH in a major seawater ion electrolyte. Also included in Figure 7 is a compilation of the titration data used in determining the calculated charge.
The simplified mass and proton balance model determined what the surface species distribution of goethite would be in a mixed, seawater type electrolyte. This surface species distribution was used to calculate a surface charge for goethite. [Pg.294]

These surface species distributions indicate that Fe-OH sites are the primary sites and that the formation of Mg and S0i+... [Pg.294]

The pll dependence of (-potential, surface speciation and colloid stability ratios is presented in Figure 4. In panel (a) of Figure 4, the solid line represents the surface potential from the model, and the data points correspond to ( potential from electrokinetic measurements. The dashed line represents a reduced potential calculated at a distance of 4.0 nm from the surface. In panel (b). the surface species distribution is calculated by the SCF/DLM model. Under these conditions, the observed zero iiiterfacial potential is in the range pH 7.2 to 7.5, which suggests... [Pg.298]

Figure 4 Comparison of potentials, and surface species distribution, Ci, and experimental stability ratio, Wexp, as a function of pH in the presence of 0.2 millimolar total phthalate species. Hematite solid concentration is 17.0 mg/1, and ionic strength is 5 millimolar. The diffuse layer thickness , /c , is 4.0 nm. Figure 4 Comparison of potentials, and surface species distribution, Ci, and experimental stability ratio, Wexp, as a function of pH in the presence of 0.2 millimolar total phthalate species. Hematite solid concentration is 17.0 mg/1, and ionic strength is 5 millimolar. The diffuse layer thickness , /c , is 4.0 nm.
The physicochemical properties of carbon are highly dependent on its surface structure and chemical composition [66—68], The type and content of surface species, particle shape and size, pore-size distribution, BET surface area and pore-opening are of critical importance in the use of carbons as anode material. These properties have a major influence on (9IR, reversible capacity <2R, and the rate capability and safety of the battery. The surface chemical composition depends on the raw materials (carbon precursors), the production process, and the history of the carbon. Surface groups containing H, O, S, N, P, halogens, and other elements have been identified on carbon blacks [66, 67]. There is also ash on the surface of carbon and this typically contains Ca, Si, Fe, Al, and V. Ash and acidic oxides enhance the adsorption of the more polar compounds and electrolytes [66]. [Pg.430]

Photoinduced deposition of various noble metals onto semiconductor particles has been extensively reported [310-315]. Several factors are controlling this reaction. To control the morphology of metal clusters with desired size and distribution pattern on a given surface area of titania, the most relevant factors are the surfactant, pH, local concentration of cations, and the source of cation [316], In the case of the Ag clusters, the reaction steps proposed include the creation of electron (e )-hole (p+) pairs, the reaction of holes with OH surface species, and the reaction of electrons with adsorbed Ag+ ions ... [Pg.449]

With these experimental surface reaction parameters and the speciation program MICROQL the species distribution in the river using metal and particle concentrations, pH and alkalinity measured in the river at the concerned sampling data was calculated. Various assumptions for the complexation in solution may be used, which affect ai and thus Kd-... [Pg.378]

The distribution of Cd(II) surface species is shown as a function of SORy in Figure 14b. The mole fraction of Cd(II) surface species is defined as the ratio of the concentration of a Cd(II) surface species relative to the total Cd(II) on the surface, e.g., [SO=-CdOH ]/[Icd(II)adsorbed]. [Pg.185]

In the following model example, we assume that each species involved in the binding process has a spherical shape and that the FGs on its surface are distributed in such a way that each pair of FGs on the surface (i.e., exposed to the solvent) is independently solvated. In other words, the conditional solvation Gibbs energy of the ith FG (given the hard core H) is independent of the presence or absence of any other FGs. Formally, this is equivalent to taking only the first sum over i in the expansion on the rhs of Eq. (9.4.2). [Pg.303]

Reduces available total dissolved metal concentrations and changes metal species distribution because of adsorption on cell surfaces and/or by complexation with exudates from organisms. [Pg.810]

MCM-41 (1060 30m g ) with a narrow distribution of pore diameters, centered around 3.2 nm, was chosen as support. Tetrakis(neopentyl)titanium, TiNp4 (1), reacts with this support to form =SiO-TiNp3 (2a) and (=SiO)2TiNp2 (2b). The reaction leads to a more important proportion of bis-siloxy surface species, 2b, than on non-porous Aerosil silica (Scheme 2.8). [Pg.30]

In many cases, during the impregnahon a surface reaction between the organometallic compound and the surface takes place. The pretreatment of the support can be used to define the distribution of anchorage centers on the surface, and a homogeneous distribution of metal carbonyl surface species can be achieved. [Pg.315]


See other pages where Surface species, distribution is mentioned: [Pg.295]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.2709]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.1444]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.502]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.345 ]




SEARCH



Species distribution

Surface distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info