Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Thermodynamic Potential Function

Two simulation methods—Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics—allow calculation of the density profile and pressure difference of Eq. III-44 across the vapor-liquid interface [64, 65]. In the former method, the initial system consists of N molecules in assumed positions. An intermolecule potential function is chosen, such as the Lennard-Jones potential, and the positions are randomly varied until the energy of the system is at a minimum. The resulting configuration is taken to be the equilibrium one. In the molecular dynamics approach, the N molecules are given initial positions and velocities and the equations of motion are solved to follow the ensuing collisions until the set shows constant time-average thermodynamic properties. Both methods are computer intensive yet widely used. [Pg.63]

Eq. (1) would correspond to a constant energy, constant volume, or micro-canonical simulation scheme. There are various approaches to extend this to a canonical (constant temperature), or other thermodynamic ensembles. (A discussion of these approaches is beyond the scope of the present review.) However, in order to perform such a simulation there are several difficulties to overcome. First, the interactions have to be determined properly, which means that one needs a potential function which describes the system correctly. Second, one needs good initial conditions for the velocities and the positions of the individual particles since, as shown in Sec. II, simulations on this detailed level can only cover a fairly short period of time. Moreover, the overall conformation of the system should be in equilibrium. [Pg.485]

Jorgensen et al. has developed a series of united atom intermolecular potential functions based on multiple Monte Carlo simulations of small molecules [10-23]. Careful optimisation of these functions has been possible by fitting to the thermodynamic properties of the materials studied. Combining these OPLS functions (Optimised Potentials for Liquid Simulation) with the AMBER intramolecular force field provides a powerful united-atom force field [24] which has been used in bulk simulations of liquid crystals [25-27],... [Pg.44]

However, it has turned out that the most accurate way of fixing these parameters is through matching of simulated phase equilibria to those derived from experiment.33 As a final step, the potential, regardless of its source, should be validated through extensive comparison with available experimental data for structural, thermodynamic, and dynamic properties obtained from simulations of the material of interest, closely related materials, and model compounds used in the parameterization. The importance of potential function validation in simulation of real materials cannot be overemphasized. [Pg.10]

Gibbs equation, which is perfectly general, may be deduced readily from the potential functions of Gibbs Thermodynamics, p. 221) and Duhem Le Potential Thermodynamique, Paris 1886), or in the following manner. [Pg.31]

Catalysts and their effects on chemical reactions aid in efficiency, effectiveness and selectivity. A recent example of current research is redox and ligand exchange reactions of the oxygenation catalyst (N,N -bis(salicylidene)ethylenediaminato)co-balt(II), Co(SALEN)2 (below), and its one-electron oxidation product, Co(salen) 2-These were investigated in DMF, pyridine, and mixtures of these solvents. Solvent effects on the potentials, the thermodynamics of cross reactions, and the distribution of Co(II) and Co(III) species as a function of the solvent composition are important considerations (Eichhorn, 1997). The results in these solvents should be compared with other work with catalysts using more environmentally benign media (Collins et al., 1998). [Pg.28]

Further examination of the Williams approach seems called for, both to improve the method for estimating parameters such as the relaxation time, and to clarify the relationship between the intramolecular potential form and non-thermodynamic frictional forces. The method might provide a fairly unified description of non-linear flow porperties if a suitable potential function for large scale molecular friction were found. Aside from the Williams work, there have been no theoretical studies dealing with t] vs. y at low to moderate concentrations. The systematic changes in the master curve /(/ ) with coil overlap c[ij] are thus without explanation at the present time. [Pg.144]

The most famous rotational barrier is that in ethane, but because the molecule is nonpolar its barrier is obtained from thermodynamic or infrared data, rather than from microwave spectroscopy. Microwave spectroscopy has provided barrier heights for a few dozen molecules. For molecules with three equivalent potential minima in the internal-rotation potential-energy function, the barriers usually range from 1 to 4 kcal/ mole, except for very bulky substituents, where the barrier is higher. Interestingly, when the potential function has sixfold symmetry, the barrier is extremely low for example, CH3BF2 has a barrier of 14 cal/mole.14... [Pg.119]

The basis of defect thermodynamics is the concept of regular and irregular SE s and the constraints which crystallography and electroneutrality (in the case of ionic crystals) impose on the derivation of the thermodynamic functions. Thermodynamic potential functions are of particular interest, since one derives the driving forces for the chemical processes in the solid state from them. [Pg.41]

Chemical kinetics concerns the evolution in time of a system which deviates from equilibrium. The acting driving forces are the gradients of thermodynamic potential functions. Before establishing the behavior and kinetic laws of interfaces, we need to understand some basic interface thermodynamics. The equilibrium interface is characterized by equal and opposite fluxes of components (or building elements) in the direction normal to the boundary. Ternary systems already reflect the general... [Pg.235]

Calculations have been performed on atom clusters by Hoare and Pal (55) and Burton (39) to determine their geometrical and thermodynamic properties using empirical potential functions. In this technique the pairwise potentials V(Rjj) between atoms, a distance Ry apart, are assumed additive to give a potential energy... [Pg.16]

The first chapter by Moszyliski presents in a systematic and comprehensive manner the current state-of-the-art theory of intermolecular interactions. Numerous examples illustrate how theoreticians and experimentalists working in tandem may gather valuable quantitative results related to intermolecular interactions, like accurate potential functions, interaction-induced properties, spectra and collisional characteristics or dielectric, refractive or thermodynamic properties of bulk phases. On the other hand the most advanced Symmetry Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT) enables validation of more approximate variation-pertubation models which could be applied to the analysis of specific interactions in much larger molecular systems, for example enzyme-drug interactions discussed in Chapter VIII by Berlicki et al. [Pg.603]

At its most satisfying level, a statistical thermodynamic theory would begin by specifying realistic interaction potentials for the molecular components of a complex mixture and from these potentials the thermodynamic functions and phase behavior would be predicted without further approximation. For the next decade or so, there is little hope to accomplish such a theory for microstructured fluids. However, predictive theories can be obtained with the aid of elemental structures models. Also, lattice models... [Pg.181]

In the thermodynamic integration method, the intermediate states are introduced with respect to the coupling parameter A(0 < k < 1) The potential function at the coupling parameter of A. is denoted by Ux and satisfies Ux = Uo and Ux = U at the initial and final states (A. = 0 and 1), respectively. The intermediate states correspond to 0 < A < 1. The form of averaging-the-exponential is then avoided by rewriting Eq. (17-28) as... [Pg.471]

We take up this topic not only because of its intrinsic interest, but because it is pedagogically valuable to note the various descriptions that arise from the multitude of available choices for the basic thermodynamic potential functions. The system under consideration consists of a thin layer of atoms held on the surface of a solid or liquid exposed to a gas phase. The solid or liquid is termed the adsorbent. whereas the material held on the surface is called the adsorbate the process by which the thin surface layer is formed from the transfer of gas molecules to the surface phase is called adsorption. [Pg.458]

The comparison of the Xj, thermodynamic data with the corresponding MXn x data also appears to suggest a viable method for making predictions from the dimensional model. In every case tested except the Xy species, the MX -i line lies close to the points for the Xj, polymers. We believe that the disparity In the Xy case Is probably due to the lack of enough MX5(g) data points (Fig. 1). Note In Table I that for every species tested except the MXg molecules the Oq values at 1000 K lie close to 20. Interestingly, If we artificially Increase the value for the MX5 from 17.9 to 20, the discrepancy between the two Xy points and the MX5 line Is reduced considerably (Fig. 5). Ultimately we plan to numerically evaluate the configuration Integral with various potential functions for homonuclear clusters. [Pg.218]

The K-BKZ has the interesting property being thermodynamically consistent because one can theoretically derive two material functions which depend on a single potential function u in the general form ... [Pg.149]

Cancellation of the Cauchy term may bring some discrepancies, the more evident one being that, whatever h is, it leads to a zero second normal stress difference. A more subtle one concerns the loss of the thermodynamic consistency of the model. Indeed, it is not possible to find any potential function in the form Udi, I2) with h2di, I2) = 0 unless hi only depends on Ii. As mentioned by Larson [27, 28], this can induce violation of the second principle in complex flows such as those encoxmtered in processing conditions. [Pg.151]


See other pages where Thermodynamic Potential Function is mentioned: [Pg.14]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.377]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.845 ]




SEARCH



Cell potential thermodynamic function

Potential function

Potentials potential functions

Thermodynamic functions

Thermodynamic potentials

Thermodynamics potentials

© 2024 chempedia.info